• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性肾输尿管切除术与节段性输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学和功能结局比较。

Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 9;11(1):7828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5
PMID:33837237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8035162/
Abstract

This study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function.

摘要

本研究旨在比较根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)和节段性输尿管切除术(SU)治疗上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的肿瘤学和功能结局。我们回顾性收集了接受 RNU 或 SU 治疗 UTUC 的患者数据。对 394 例患者进行倾向评分匹配,得出最终的 RNU 组 40 例和 SU 组 40 例。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验比较两组患者的总生存(OS)、癌症特异性生存(CSS)、无进展生存(PFS)和膀胱内无复发生存(IVRFS)。我们还比较了术后估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的变化。RNU 组和 SU 组在 CSS、PFS 和 IVRFS 方面无显著差异,但 RNU 组的 OS 优于 SU 组(p=0.032)。SU 组术后 eGFR 优于 RNU 组(p<0.001)。与 RNU 相比,SU 可为 UTUC 患者提供相当的 CSS、PFS 和 IVRFS,即使是在晚期和/或高级别癌症患者中也是如此。此外,SU 还能更好地保留肾功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5426/8035162/14477fd04e68/41598_2021_87573_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5426/8035162/14477fd04e68/41598_2021_87573_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5426/8035162/14477fd04e68/41598_2021_87573_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.根治性肾输尿管切除术与节段性输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学和功能结局比较。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 9;11(1):7828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5.
2
Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel.保留肾单位手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:EAU 非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌指南小组的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1052-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.对上尿路尿路上皮癌行节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术术后肿瘤学及肾功能结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;42(11):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
4
Robotic radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional experience.机器人根治性肾输尿管切除术和节段性输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:多机构经验。
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2303-2311. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02790-y. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
Comparison of oncological outcomes after segmental ureterectomy or radical nephroureterectomy in urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract: results from a large French multicentre study.比较上尿路尿路上皮癌行节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术的肿瘤学结局:一项来自法国大型多中心研究的结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8):1134-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10960.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
6
Segmental ureterectomy vs. radical nephroureterectomy for ureteral carcinoma in patients with a preoperative glomerular filtration rate less than 90 ml/min/1.73 m: A multicenter study.节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗术前肾小球滤过率小于 90ml/min/1.73m2 的输尿管癌:一项多中心研究。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Jun;38(6):601.e11-601.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
Oncologic outcomes of patients treated with kidney-sparing surgery or radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based study.保留肾单位手术或根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的肿瘤学结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Urol Oncol. 2024 Jan;42(1):22.e1-22.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.019. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
8
Effects of Complete Bladder Cuff Removal on Oncological Outcomes Following Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.完全去除膀胱袖套对根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局的影响。
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;53(3):795-802. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.919. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
9
Segmental Ureterectomy Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy in Older Patients Treated for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的老年患者。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Aug;20(4):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
10
Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy improves the survival outcome of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with cardiovascular comorbidity.根治性肾输尿管切除术(radical nephroureterectomy)后辅助化疗可改善伴有心血管合并症的高危上尿路上皮癌患者的生存结局。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 19;10(1):17674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74940-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Kidney sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.上尿路尿路上皮癌保留肾手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术的Meta分析和系统评价
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 2;15:1448079. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1448079. eCollection 2025.
2
Narrative review of nephron-sparing surgical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: is there a role for distal ureterectomy, segmental ureterectomy, and partial nephrectomy.上尿路尿路上皮癌保留肾单位手术治疗的叙述性综述:远端输尿管切除术、节段性输尿管切除术和部分肾切除术是否有作用?
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):156-164. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-123. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
2
Oncological and renal outcomes of segmental ureterectomy vs. radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学和肾脏结局
Oncol Lett. 2018 Nov;16(5):6861-6867. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9463. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
3
The Impact of Preoperative Severe Renal Insufficiency on Poor Postsurgical Oncological Prognosis in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma.
Analysis of progression after elective distal ureterectomy and effects of salvage radical nephroureterectomy in patients with distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma.
选择性远端输尿管切除术治疗后进展的分析及挽救性根治性肾输尿管切除术对远端输尿管尿路上皮癌患者的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 12;14(1):3497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54232-4.
4
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Current Surveillance Strategies for Non-Metastatic Disease.上尿路尿路上皮癌:非转移性疾病当前监测策略的叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 20;16(1):44. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010044.
5
Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives.上尿路尿路上皮癌的淋巴结清扫术:现状与未来展望。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1327-1344. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
6
The long-term outcome of nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for organ-localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study of 1969 patients.保肾手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局限性上尿路尿路上皮癌的长期疗效:1969 例患者的基于人群研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):14869-14878. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05264-2. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
7
Efficacy of combined organ-sparing management of invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.浸润性上尿路尿路上皮癌联合器官保留治疗的疗效
Cent European J Urol. 2023;76(2):162-166. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.019. Epub 2023 May 5.
8
Case Report: Step-by-step procedures for total intracorporeal laparoscopic kidney autotransplantation in a patient with distal high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma.病例报告:远端高危上尿路尿路上皮癌患者完全腹腔镜下自体肾移植的分步手术过程
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 24;13:1142819. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1142819. eCollection 2023.
9
Nephron-Sparing Approaches in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current and Future Strategies.上尿路尿路上皮癌的保留肾单位方法:当前及未来策略
Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 8;10(9):2223. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092223.
10
Clinical Implication of Preoperative Renal Function on Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy.术前肾功能对根治性肾输尿管切除术后上尿路尿路上皮癌患者肿瘤学结局的临床意义。
Biomedicines. 2022 Jun 7;10(6):1340. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061340.
术前严重肾功能不全对尿路上皮癌患者术后不良肿瘤预后的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Nov;5(6):1066-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Is preoperative chronic kidney disease status associated with oncologic outcomes in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma? A multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.术前慢性肾病状态与上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局相关吗?一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 15;8(39):66540-66549. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16239. eCollection 2017 Sep 12.
5
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update.欧洲泌尿外科学会上尿路尿路上皮癌指南:2017 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2018 Jan;73(1):111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.036. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.对上尿路尿路上皮癌行节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术术后肿瘤学及肾功能结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;42(11):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel.保留肾单位手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:EAU 非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌指南小组的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1052-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
Multi-institutional analysis of renal function outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy and partial ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.根治性肾输尿管切除术和部分输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌后肾功能结果的多机构分析
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jun;33(6):268.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
Radical nephroureterectomy versus endoscopic procedures for the treatment of localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis and a systematic review of current evidence from comparative studies.根治性肾输尿管切除术与内镜手术治疗局限性上尿路尿路上皮癌的比较:一项荟萃分析及对比较研究现有证据的系统评价
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;40(12):1629-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
10
Equivalent survival and improved preservation of renal function after distal ureterectomy compared with nephroureterectomy in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the distal ureter: a propensity score-matched multicenter study.远端输尿管尿路上皮癌患者行远端输尿管切除术后与肾输尿管切除术相比,具有等效的生存率和更好的肾功能保留:一项倾向评分匹配的多中心研究。
Int J Urol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1098-104. doi: 10.1111/iju.12554. Epub 2014 Jul 14.