• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高D-二聚体临界值水平可能适用于在急诊科排除活动性癌症患者的肺栓塞。

Elevation of the D-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department.

作者信息

Kwon Hyojeong, Kim Youn-Jung, Her Eun-Ju, Chae Bora, Lee Yoon-Seon

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;17(2):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02730-y. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11739-021-02730-y
PMID:33837486
Abstract

Recent guidelines for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are based on clinical decision rules and D-dimer. D-dimer measurement is recommended only for patients who are 'PE-unlikely'. We aimed to assess the current guidelines for cancer patients and to determine an optimal D-dimer cut-off level. This retrospective observational study was conducted in the emergency department of Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between 02/2017 and 09/2017 for the development cohort and between 06/2018 and 02/2019 for the validation cohort. Among adult active cancer patients with suspected PE, we included those who were 'PE-unlikely' according to Wells' criteria and who underwent D-dimer testing and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). A total of 498 patients (227 in the development cohort and 271 in the validation cohort) were included, and PE was diagnosed in 8.8% and 18.5% of patients, respectively. The optimal D-dimer cut-off level was 2.0 μg/mL. This elevated cut-off level showed a much higher specificity of 21.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.2-27.3%) and 21.7% (95% CI 16.8-7.6%) in the development and validation sets, respectively, compared with the specificity of 4.4% (95% CI 2.3-8.1%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2.2-7.6%) using the age-adjusted cut-off. The new D-dimer cut-off value identified unnecessary CTPA for 21.3% of patients (absolute difference, 16.9%, 35 of 207) in the development cohort and 21.7% (absolute difference, 17.6%, 39 of 221) of patients in the validation cohort compared to using the standard age-adjusted cut-off. The elevated D-dimer cut-off value combined with Wells' criteria might reduce unnecessary CTPA in active cancer patients with a 'PE-unlikely' classification. Further clinical trials are warranted to improve the PE diagnostic strategy in cancer patients.

摘要

近期急性肺栓塞(PE)的诊断指南基于临床决策规则和D-二聚体。仅建议对“PE可能性低”的患者进行D-二聚体检测。我们旨在评估针对癌症患者的现行指南,并确定最佳的D-二聚体临界值。这项回顾性观察研究于2017年2月至2017年9月在峨山医学中心(韩国首尔)急诊科进行了开发队列研究,于2018年6月至2019年2月进行了验证队列研究。在疑似PE的成年活动性癌症患者中,我们纳入了那些根据Wells标准“PE可能性低”且接受了D-二聚体检测和计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)的患者。共纳入498例患者(开发队列227例,验证队列271例),分别有8.8%和18.5%的患者被诊断为PE。最佳D-二聚体临界值为2.0μg/mL。与使用年龄调整临界值时4.4%(95%置信区间[CI]2.3-8.1%)和4.1%(95%CI 2.2-7.6%)的特异性相比,这个升高的临界值在开发集和验证集中分别显示出更高的特异性,为21.3%(95%CI 16.2-27.3%)和21.7%(95%CI 16.8-27.6%)。与使用标准年龄调整临界值相比,新的D-二聚体临界值在开发队列中确定21.3%的患者(绝对差异16.9%,207例中的35例)和验证队列中21.7%(绝对差异17.6%,221例中的39例)的患者无需进行CTPA。升高的D-二聚体临界值与Wells标准相结合,可能会减少“PE可能性低”分类的活动性癌症患者不必要的CTPA检查。有必要进行进一步的临床试验以改进癌症患者的PE诊断策略。

相似文献

1
Elevation of the D-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department.提高D-二聚体临界值水平可能适用于在急诊科排除活动性癌症患者的肺栓塞。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;17(2):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02730-y. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
2
Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.回顾性验证“PE 可能性不大”的疑似肺栓塞患者中肺栓塞排除标准规则。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(3):185-190. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000442.
3
Comparison of Wells and YEARS clinical decision rules with D-dimer for low-risk pulmonary embolus patients. Wells 和 YEARS 临床决策规则与 D-二聚体在低危肺栓塞患者中的比较。
Intern Med J. 2019 Jun;49(6):739-744. doi: 10.1111/imj.14138.
4
[Diagnostic value of D-dimer combined with Wells score for suspected pulmonary embolism].D-二聚体联合Wells评分对疑似肺栓塞的诊断价值
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Oct 18;50(5):828-832.
5
Overutilisation of imaging studies for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: are we following the guidelines?过度使用影像学检查诊断肺栓塞:我们是否遵循了指南?
Postgrad Med J. 2019 Aug;95(1126):420-424. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135995. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
6
D-dimer threshold increase with pretest probability unlikely for pulmonary embolism to decrease unnecessary computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography.D-二聚体检测界值升高伴低临床可能性可降低疑似肺栓塞患者行不必要的计算机断层肺动脉造影。
J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Apr;10(4):572-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04647.x.
7
The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.四种不同临床决策规则与年龄校正 D-二聚体截断值联合应用可增加能够安全排除急性肺栓塞患者的数量。
Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jan;107(1):167-71. doi: 10.1160/TH11-08-0587. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
8
Can an age-adjusted D-dimer level be adopted in managing venous thromboembolism in the emergency department? A retrospective cohort study.在急诊科管理静脉血栓栓塞症时能否采用年龄校正的 D-二聚体水平?一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):288-294. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000448.
9
Age-adjusted cut-off using the IL D-dimer HS assay to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to emergency.使用IL D-二聚体高灵敏度检测法进行年龄校正的临界值,以排除就诊于急诊科的患者的肺栓塞。
Intern Med J. 2018 Sep;48(9):1096-1101. doi: 10.1111/imj.13992.
10
Clinical decision rule and D-dimer have lower clinical utility to exclude pulmonary embolism in cancer patients. Explanations and potential ameliorations.临床决策规则和 D-二聚体对排除癌症患者肺栓塞的临床应用价值较低。解释和潜在的改善方法。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct;104(4):831-6. doi: 10.1160/TH10-02-0093. Epub 2010 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Age as a key risk factor for deep vein thrombosis in patients with lower limb cellulitis.年龄是下肢蜂窝织炎患者深静脉血栓形成的关键风险因素。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 20;12:1567280. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1567280. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk factors for pulmonary embolism in lung cancer patients with lower limb deep venous thrombosis: a case-control study.肺癌合并下肢深静脉血栓患者发生肺栓塞的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Jul 31;12(7):1539-1548. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-346. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
3
A new machine learning model for predicting severity prognosis in patients with pulmonary embolism: Study protocol from Wenzhou, China.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床肺栓塞预测规则:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 May;8(5):957-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03801.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
一种用于预测肺栓塞患者严重程度预后的新型机器学习模型:来自中国温州的研究方案。
Front Neuroinform. 2022 Dec 16;16:1052868. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2022.1052868. eCollection 2022.