Suppr超能文献

提高D-二聚体临界值水平可能适用于在急诊科排除活动性癌症患者的肺栓塞。

Elevation of the D-dimer cut-off level might be applicable to rule out pulmonary embolism for active cancer patients in the emergency department.

作者信息

Kwon Hyojeong, Kim Youn-Jung, Her Eun-Ju, Chae Bora, Lee Yoon-Seon

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;17(2):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02730-y. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

Abstract

Recent guidelines for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are based on clinical decision rules and D-dimer. D-dimer measurement is recommended only for patients who are 'PE-unlikely'. We aimed to assess the current guidelines for cancer patients and to determine an optimal D-dimer cut-off level. This retrospective observational study was conducted in the emergency department of Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between 02/2017 and 09/2017 for the development cohort and between 06/2018 and 02/2019 for the validation cohort. Among adult active cancer patients with suspected PE, we included those who were 'PE-unlikely' according to Wells' criteria and who underwent D-dimer testing and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). A total of 498 patients (227 in the development cohort and 271 in the validation cohort) were included, and PE was diagnosed in 8.8% and 18.5% of patients, respectively. The optimal D-dimer cut-off level was 2.0 μg/mL. This elevated cut-off level showed a much higher specificity of 21.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.2-27.3%) and 21.7% (95% CI 16.8-7.6%) in the development and validation sets, respectively, compared with the specificity of 4.4% (95% CI 2.3-8.1%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2.2-7.6%) using the age-adjusted cut-off. The new D-dimer cut-off value identified unnecessary CTPA for 21.3% of patients (absolute difference, 16.9%, 35 of 207) in the development cohort and 21.7% (absolute difference, 17.6%, 39 of 221) of patients in the validation cohort compared to using the standard age-adjusted cut-off. The elevated D-dimer cut-off value combined with Wells' criteria might reduce unnecessary CTPA in active cancer patients with a 'PE-unlikely' classification. Further clinical trials are warranted to improve the PE diagnostic strategy in cancer patients.

摘要

近期急性肺栓塞(PE)的诊断指南基于临床决策规则和D-二聚体。仅建议对“PE可能性低”的患者进行D-二聚体检测。我们旨在评估针对癌症患者的现行指南,并确定最佳的D-二聚体临界值。这项回顾性观察研究于2017年2月至2017年9月在峨山医学中心(韩国首尔)急诊科进行了开发队列研究,于2018年6月至2019年2月进行了验证队列研究。在疑似PE的成年活动性癌症患者中,我们纳入了那些根据Wells标准“PE可能性低”且接受了D-二聚体检测和计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)的患者。共纳入498例患者(开发队列227例,验证队列271例),分别有8.8%和18.5%的患者被诊断为PE。最佳D-二聚体临界值为2.0μg/mL。与使用年龄调整临界值时4.4%(95%置信区间[CI]2.3-8.1%)和4.1%(95%CI 2.2-7.6%)的特异性相比,这个升高的临界值在开发集和验证集中分别显示出更高的特异性,为21.3%(95%CI 16.2-27.3%)和21.7%(95%CI 16.8-27.6%)。与使用标准年龄调整临界值相比,新的D-二聚体临界值在开发队列中确定21.3%的患者(绝对差异16.9%,207例中的35例)和验证队列中21.7%(绝对差异17.6%,221例中的39例)的患者无需进行CTPA。升高的D-二聚体临界值与Wells标准相结合,可能会减少“PE可能性低”分类的活动性癌症患者不必要的CTPA检查。有必要进行进一步的临床试验以改进癌症患者的PE诊断策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验