• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对患有刺激性咳嗽患者的咳速停糖浆和苯海拉明止咳糖浆的试验。

A trial of Lotussin and linctus diphenhydramine in patients wth an irritant cough.

作者信息

Matts S G

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1977;5(6):470-2. doi: 10.1177/030006057300100216.

DOI:10.1177/030006057300100216
PMID:338397
Abstract

Lotussin and linctus diphenhydramine were compared for efficacy and patient preference in fifty patients suffering from post-infective cough. The trial was a single-blind randomized crossover one which was subjected to sequential analysis based on patient preferences. Under the conditions of the trial there appeared to be a significant difference in favour of Lotussin (p less than 0-01).

摘要

对50例感染后咳嗽患者比较了止咳露(Lotussin)和含苯海拉明止咳糖浆的疗效及患者偏好。该试验为单盲随机交叉试验,并根据患者偏好进行序贯分析。在试验条件下,结果显示止咳露有显著优势(p小于0.01)。

相似文献

1
A trial of Lotussin and linctus diphenhydramine in patients wth an irritant cough.一项针对患有刺激性咳嗽患者的咳速停糖浆和苯海拉明止咳糖浆的试验。
J Int Med Res. 1977;5(6):470-2. doi: 10.1177/030006057300100216.
2
[Attempt to test a new antitussive agent].[尝试测试一种新型镇咳药]
Z Allgemeinmed. 1974 Feb 10;50(4):185-7.
3
Rococo study: a real-world evaluation of an over-the-counter medicine in acute cough (a multicentre, randomised, controlled study).洛可可研究:一种非处方药治疗急性咳嗽的真实世界评估(一项多中心、随机、对照研究)
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 16;7(1):e014112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014112.
4
Effectiveness of cough syrups.
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1993 Jul-Aug;6(4):429.
5
Over-the-counter cough and cold medicines: should parents be using them for their children?非处方止咳和感冒药:家长应该给孩子使用吗?
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Nov;38(11):1964-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E405. Epub 2004 Oct 12.
6
Effect of dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, and placebo on nocturnal cough and sleep quality for coughing children and their parents.右美沙芬、苯海拉明和安慰剂对咳嗽儿童及其父母夜间咳嗽和睡眠质量的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):512; author reply 512-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2320.
7
Child assessment of dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, and placebo for nocturnal cough due to upper respiratory infection.右美沙芬、苯海拉明和安慰剂对儿童上呼吸道感染所致夜间咳嗽的评估。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006 Sep;45(7):633-40. doi: 10.1177/0009922806291014.
8
Therapeutic approaches to the common cold in children.儿童普通感冒的治疗方法。
Clin Ther. 1984;6(4):475-82.
9
Kids' cough drugs may not work.儿童止咳药可能无效。
Consum Rep. 2004 Dec;69(12):56.
10
Effect of dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, and placebo on nocturnal cough and sleep quality for coughing children and their parents.右美沙芬、苯海拉明及安慰剂对咳嗽儿童及其父母夜间咳嗽和睡眠质量的影响。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):1370. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1564.

引用本文的文献

1
Codeine versus placebo for chronic cough in children.可待因与安慰剂治疗儿童慢性咳嗽的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;7(7):CD011914. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011914.pub2.
2
Efficacy of diphenhydramine against cough in humans: a review.苯海拉明对人类咳嗽的疗效:一项综述。
Pharm World Sci. 2007 Dec;29(6):577-83. doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9122-2. Epub 2007 May 8.