Department of Anesthesia, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Aug;65(7):967-978. doi: 10.1111/aas.13829. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
Supplemental oxygen (SO) is one of the most commonly administered drugs in trauma patients and is recommended by guidelines. However, evidence supporting uniform administration is sparse, and excess oxygen use has been shown to be harmful in other patient populations. We hypothesized that SO may be harmful in patients with oxygen saturation > 97%.
Patients with available information on SO-therapy in the American Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2017 database were included. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to Emergency Department (ED) oxygen saturation: (1) saturation < 94%; (2) saturation 94%-97%; (3) saturation 98%-100%. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality with comparisons made between patients who received SO or not. Secondary outcome was acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Patients were compared after propensity score matching.
Overall, 864 340 patients were identified. Mean age was 47.4 ± 24.4 years, and median injury severity score was 9. SO was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality: (all patients: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] with 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.07 [2.92-3.22], ED saturation <94%: 2.63 [2.38-2.91], ED saturation 94%-97%: 2.71 [2.47-2.97], ED saturation >97%: 3.38 [3.16-3.61]. Same pattern was seen for in-hospital ARDS: (aOR 1.79, 95% CI [1.59-2.02], ED saturation <94%: aOR 1.75, 95% CI [1.37-2.24], ED saturation 94%-97%: aOR 1.81, 95% CI [1.43-2.29, ED saturation >97%: aOR 2.31, 95% CI [1.92-2.79]).
Based on propensity matched, registry data for trauma patients, the administration of SO was associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality and ARDS. The highest risk was found in patients with an ED saturation >97%.
在创伤患者中,补充氧气(SO)是最常用的药物之一,并且该治疗方法被指南推荐。然而,支持统一使用 SO 的证据很少,并且在其他患者群体中已经证明过度使用氧气是有害的。我们假设 SO 可能对氧饱和度> 97%的患者有害。
纳入了 2017 年美国创伤质量改进计划数据库中关于 SO 治疗信息的患者。根据急诊科(ED)的氧饱和度,患者被分为 3 组:(1)饱和度<94%;(2)饱和度 94%-97%;(3)饱和度 98%-100%。主要结局是院内死亡率,并比较了接受 SO 治疗和未接受 SO 治疗的患者。次要结局是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。在进行倾向评分匹配后,对患者进行比较。
总共确定了 864340 名患者。平均年龄为 47.4±24.4 岁,中位数损伤严重程度评分为 9。SO 与院内死亡率增加相关:(所有患者:调整后的优势比 [aOR] 及其 95%置信区间 [CI] 为 3.07 [2.92-3.22],ED 饱和度<94%:2.63 [2.38-2.91],ED 饱和度 94%-97%:2.71 [2.47-2.97],ED 饱和度>97%:3.38 [3.16-3.61]。在院内 ARDS 中也出现了相同的模式:(aOR 1.79,95%CI [1.59-2.02],ED 饱和度<94%:aOR 1.75,95%CI [1.37-2.24],ED 饱和度 94%-97%:aOR 1.81,95%CI [1.43-2.29],ED 饱和度>97%:aOR 2.31,95%CI [1.92-2.79])。
基于倾向评分匹配的创伤患者登记数据,SO 的使用与院内死亡率和 ARDS 的发生率增加相关。ED 饱和度>97%的患者风险最高。