Cooper Michael C, Srivastava Geetanjali
From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern; and Children's Health, Dallas, TX.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Jun;34(6):369-375. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001509.
In-hospital trauma team activation criteria are formulated to identify severely injured patients requiring specialized multidisciplinary care. Efficacy of trauma activation (TA) criteria is commonly measured by emergency department (ED) disposition, injury severity score, and mortality. Necessity of critical ED interventions is another measure that has been proposed to evaluate the appropriateness of TA criteria.
Two-year retrospective cohort study of 1715 patients from our trauma registry at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. We abstracted data on acute interventions, level and criterion of TA, ED disposition, and mortality. We report odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), positive predictive value, and frequency of acute interventions.
Trauma activation was initiated for 947 (55%) of the 1715 patients. There were 426 ED interventions performed on 235 patients (14%); 67.8% were in level 1 activations; 17.6% in level 2, and 14.6% in level 3. Highest-level activations were highly associated with need for ED interventions (OR, 16.1; 95% CI, 11.5-22.4). The ORs for requiring an ED intervention were low for lower level activations (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.5), trauma service consults (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), and certain mechanism-based criteria. The ORs for ED intervention for isolated motor vehicle collision (0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7), isolated all-terrain vehicle rollover (0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-1.7), and suspected spinal cord injury (0.5; 95% CI, 0.1-3.7) were significantly lower than 1.
Highest-level activation criteria correlate with high utilization of ED resources and interventions. Lower level activation criteria and trauma service consult criteria are not highly correlated with need for ED interventions. Downgrading isolated motor vehicle collision and all-terrain vehicle rollovers and suspected spinal cord injury to lower level activations could decrease the overtriage rate, and adding age-specific bradycardia as a physiologic criterion could improve our undertriage rate.
制定院内创伤团队启动标准是为了识别需要多学科专业护理的重伤患者。创伤启动(TA)标准的有效性通常通过急诊科处置、损伤严重程度评分和死亡率来衡量。急诊关键干预措施的必要性是另一种被提议用于评估TA标准适宜性的指标。
对一家一级儿科创伤中心创伤登记处的1715例患者进行为期两年的回顾性队列研究。我们提取了关于急性干预措施、TA级别和标准、急诊科处置及死亡率的数据。我们报告了比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)、阳性预测值和急性干预措施的频率。
1715例患者中有947例(55%)启动了创伤激活程序。对235例患者(14%)实施了426项急诊干预措施;67.8%为1级激活;17.6%为2级激活,14.6%为3级激活。最高级别激活与急诊干预需求高度相关(OR为16.1;95%CI为11.5 - 22.4)。较低级别激活、创伤服务会诊以及某些基于机制的标准下,需要急诊干预的OR值较低。单纯机动车碰撞(OR为0.2;95%CI为0.1 - 0.7)、单纯全地形车翻车(OR为0.4;95%CI为0.1 - 1.7)以及疑似脊髓损伤(OR为0.5;95%CI为0.1 - 3.7)的急诊干预OR值显著低于1。
最高级别激活标准与急诊资源和干预措施的高利用率相关联。较低级别激活标准和创伤服务会诊标准与急诊干预需求的相关性不高。将单纯机动车碰撞、全地形车翻车以及疑似脊髓损伤降级为较低级别激活可能会降低过度分诊率,而增加特定年龄的心动过缓作为生理标准可能会提高我们的漏诊率。