Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Germany.
Neuroradiol J. 2021 Oct;34(5):456-461. doi: 10.1177/19714009211009112. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
Data on outcome of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion suffering from intravenous thrombolysis-associated intracranial haemorrhage prior to mechanical thrombectomy remain scarce. Addressing this subject, we report our multicentre experience.
A retrospective analysis of consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy due to large vessel occlusion despite the pre-interventional occurrence of intravenous thrombolysis-associated intracranial haemorrhage was performed at five tertiary care centres between January 2010-September 2020. Baseline demographics, aetiology of stroke and intracranial haemorrhage, angiographic outcome assessed by the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score and clinical outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days were recorded.
In total, six patients were included in the study. Five individuals demonstrated cerebral intraparenchymal haemorrhage on pre-interventional imaging; in one patient additional subdural haematoma was observed and one patient suffered from isolated subarachnoid haemorrhage. All patients except one were treated by the 'drip-and-ship' paradigm. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 4/6 (67%) individuals. In 5/6 (83%) patients, the pre-interventional intracranial haemorrhage had aggravated in post-interventional computed tomography with space-occupying effect. Overall, five patients had died during the hospital stay. The clinical outcome of the survivor was modified Rankin Scale=4 at 90 days follow-up.
Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with intravenous thrombolysis-associated intracranial haemorrhage is technically feasible. The clinical outcome of this subgroup of stroke patients, however, appears to be devastating with high mortality and only carefully selected patients might benefit from endovascular treatment.
在接受静脉溶栓相关颅内出血的大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者中,机械取栓治疗结局的数据仍然很少。针对这一问题,我们报告了多中心经验。
在 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月期间,五家三级护理中心对接受机械取栓治疗的大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者尽管在介入前发生了静脉溶栓相关颅内出血。记录了患者的基线人口统计学特征、卒中病因和颅内出血,通过血栓溶解治疗脑梗死评分评估血管造影结果,通过 90 天改良 Rankin 量表评估临床结局。
共有 6 例患者纳入研究。5 例患者在介入前的影像学检查中显示脑实质内出血;1 例患者还伴有硬膜下血肿,1 例患者仅发生孤立性蛛网膜下腔出血。除 1 例患者外,所有患者均采用“滴注-转运”模式进行治疗。6 例患者中有 4 例(67%)成功实现再灌注。在 6 例患者中,5 例(83%)患者的颅内出血在介入后 CT 上出现占位效应。总的来说,5 例患者在住院期间死亡。幸存者的临床结局为改良 Rankin 量表 4 分。
在静脉溶栓相关颅内出血患者中进行机械取栓是可行的。然而,该亚组卒中患者的临床结局似乎是灾难性的,死亡率高,只有经过仔细选择的患者可能从血管内治疗中获益。