• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体行动主义与“我也是”运动初期之后两个不同群体的推特用户在推特点题上的融合。

Social Media Activism and Convergence in Tweet Topics After the Initial #MeToo Movement for Two Distinct Groups of Twitter Users.

机构信息

San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13603-NP13622. doi: 10.1177/08862605211001481. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1177/08862605211001481
PMID:33840303
Abstract

Online social media movements are now common and support cultural discussions on difficult health and social topics. The #MeToo movement, focusing on the pervasiveness of sexual assault and harassment, has been one of the largest and most influential online movements. Our study examines topics of conversation on Twitter by supporters of the #MeToo movement and by Twitter users who were uninvolved in the movement to explore the extent to which tweet topics for these two groups converge over time. We identify and collect one year's worth of tweets for supporters of the #MeToo movement ( = 168 users; = 105,538 tweets) and users not involved in the movement ( = 147 users; = 112,301 tweets referred to as the Neutral Sample). We conduct topic frequency analysis and implement an unsupervised machine learning topic modeling algorithm, latent Dirichlet allocation, to explore topics of discussion on Twitter for these two groups of users before and after the initial #MeToo movement. Our results suggest that supporters of #MeToo discussed different topics compared to the Neutral Sample of Twitter users before #MeToo with some overlap on politics. The supporters were already discussing sexual assault and harassment issues six months before #MeToo, and discussion on this topic increased 13.7-fold in the six months after. For the Neutral Sample, sexual assault and harassment was not a key topic of discussion on Twitter before #MeToo, but there was some limited increase afterward. Results of bigram frequency analysis and topic modeling showed a clear increase in topic related to gender for the supporters of #MeToo but gave mixed results for the Neutral Sample comparison group. Our results suggest limited shifts in the conversation on Twitter for the Neutral Sample. Our methods and results have implications for measuring the extent to which online social media movements, like #MeToo, reach a broad audience.

摘要

在线社交媒体运动现在很常见,支持关于困难的健康和社会话题的文化讨论。#MeToo 运动是规模最大、最有影响力的在线运动之一,其重点是性侵犯和性骚扰的普遍性。我们的研究通过 #MeToo 运动的支持者和未参与该运动的 Twitter 用户在 Twitter 上的对话主题,探讨了这两个群体的话题在多大程度上随着时间的推移而趋同。我们确定并收集了一年来支持 #MeToo 运动的用户(=168 名用户;=105538 条推文)和未参与该运动的用户(=147 名用户;=112301 条推文,称为中立样本)的推文。我们进行了主题频率分析,并实施了无监督机器学习主题建模算法,潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA),以探讨这两个用户群体在最初的#MeToo 运动前后在 Twitter 上的讨论主题。我们的研究结果表明,与中立样本相比,#MeToo 的支持者在 #MeToo 之前讨论的主题不同,并且在政治方面存在一些重叠。支持者在 #MeToo 之前的六个月就已经在讨论性侵犯和性骚扰问题,并且在之后的六个月里,这一话题的讨论增加了 13.7 倍。对于中立样本,在 #MeToo 之前,性侵犯和性骚扰并不是 Twitter 上的一个主要讨论主题,但之后也有一些有限的增加。二元词频率分析和主题建模的结果表明,#MeToo 的支持者的主题与性别相关的话题明显增加,但对于中立样本的对比组,结果则喜忧参半。我们的研究结果表明,中立样本在 Twitter 上的对话变化有限。我们的方法和结果对于衡量像#MeToo 这样的在线社交媒体运动在多大程度上能够吸引更广泛的受众具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Social Media Activism and Convergence in Tweet Topics After the Initial #MeToo Movement for Two Distinct Groups of Twitter Users.社交媒体行动主义与“我也是”运动初期之后两个不同群体的推特用户在推特点题上的融合。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13603-NP13622. doi: 10.1177/08862605211001481. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
The #MeToo Movement in the United States: Text Analysis of Early Twitter Conversations.美国的#MeToo运动:早期推特对话的文本分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 3;21(9):e13837. doi: 10.2196/13837.
3
Negative Attitudes and Beliefs Toward the #MeToo Movement on Twitter.对 #MeToo 运动在 Twitter 上的负面态度和看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13018-NP13044. doi: 10.1177/08862605211001470. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
A Typology of Social Media Use by Human Service Nonprofits: Mixed Methods Study.社交媒体在人类服务非营利组织中的应用类型学:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 8;26:e51698. doi: 10.2196/51698.
5
Demographic Representation and Collective Storytelling in the Me Too Twitter Hashtag Activism Movement.“Me Too”推特标签维权运动中的人口统计学代表性及集体叙事
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2021 Apr;5(CSCW1). doi: 10.1145/3449181.
6
Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References on X (Formerly Twitter): Neural Network Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.X(前身为 Twitter)上处方药引用的数字流行病学:神经网络主题建模和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 23;26:e57885. doi: 10.2196/57885.
7
Marketing challenges in the #MeToo era: gaining business insights using an exploratory sentiment analysis.#MeToo时代的营销挑战:运用探索性情感分析获取商业洞察
Heliyon. 2020 Mar 25;6(3):e03626. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03626. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities.推特作为社会运动的工具:对社交媒体社区中女权主义行动主义的分析。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Apr;49(3):854-868. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22324. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
9
#MeToo and Google Inquiries Into Sexual Violence: A Hashtag Campaign Can Sustain Information Seeking.#MeToo 运动和谷歌对性暴力的调查:标签运动可以持续推动信息检索。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):9857-9867. doi: 10.1177/0886260519868197. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
#MeToo: Disclosure and Response to Sexual Victimization on Twitter.#MeToo:推特上性侵犯的披露与回应。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8257-8288. doi: 10.1177/0886260519851211. Epub 2019 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Explaining Societal Shifts in Victim Blaming and Perpetrator Culpability for Sexual Violence: Evidence From the #MeToo Era.解释性暴力事件中受害者归咎与犯罪者罪责认定的社会转变:#MeToo时代的证据
Sex Roles. 2025;91(7):50. doi: 10.1007/s11199-025-01590-6. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
2
Using Twitter-Based Data for Sexual Violence Research: Scoping Review.利用推特数据进行性暴力研究:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 15;25:e46084. doi: 10.2196/46084.
3
Sampling Twitter users for social science research: evidence from a systematic review of the literature.
为社会科学研究抽样推特用户:来自文献系统综述的证据
Qual Quant. 2023 Jan 27:1-41. doi: 10.1007/s11135-023-01615-w.