• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的#MeToo运动:早期推特对话的文本分析。

The #MeToo Movement in the United States: Text Analysis of Early Twitter Conversations.

作者信息

Modrek Sepideh, Chakalov Bozhidar

机构信息

Health Equity Institute, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Economics Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 3;21(9):e13837. doi: 10.2196/13837.

DOI:10.2196/13837
PMID:31482849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6751092/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The #MeToo movement sparked an international debate on the sexual harassment, abuse, and assault and has taken many directions since its inception in October of 2017. Much of the early conversation took place on public social media sites such as Twitter, where the hashtag movement began.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to document, characterize, and quantify early public discourse and conversation of the #MeToo movement from Twitter data in the United States. We focus on posts with public first-person revelations of sexual assault/abuse and early life experiences of such events.

METHODS

We purchased full tweets and associated metadata from the Twitter Premium application programming interface between October 14 and 21, 2017 (ie, the first week of the movement). We examined the content of novel English language tweets with the phrase "MeToo" from within the United States (N=11,935). We used machine learning methods, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and support vector machine models to summarize and classify the content of individual tweets with revelations of sexual assault and abuse and early life experiences of sexual assault and abuse.

RESULTS

We found that the most predictive words created a vivid archetype of the revelations of sexual assault and abuse. We then estimated that in the first week of the movement, 11% of novel English language tweets with the words "MeToo" revealed details about the poster's experience of sexual assault or abuse and 5.8% revealed early life experiences of such events. We examined the demographic composition of posters of sexual assault and abuse and found that white women aged 25-50 years were overrepresented in terms of their representation on Twitter. Furthermore, we found that the mass sharing of personal experiences of sexual assault and abuse had a large reach, where 6 to 34 million Twitter users may have seen such first-person revelations from someone they followed in the first week of the movement.

CONCLUSIONS

These data illustrate that revelations shared went beyond acknowledgement of having experienced sexual harassment and often included vivid and traumatic descriptions of early life experiences of assault and abuse. These findings and methods underscore the value of content analysis, supported by novel machine learning methods, to improve our understanding of how widespread the revelations were, which likely amplified the spread and saliency of the #MeToo movement.

摘要

背景

“MeToo”运动引发了一场关于性骚扰、虐待和性侵的国际辩论,自2017年10月发起以来呈现出多种发展态势。早期的许多讨论在推特等公共社交媒体网站上展开,该话题标签运动正是从推特开始的。

目的

本研究旨在记录、描述和量化美国推特数据中“MeToo”运动早期的公众话语和讨论。我们关注那些以第一人称公开揭露性侵/虐待以及此类事件早期生活经历的推文。

方法

我们从推特高级应用程序编程接口购买了2017年10月14日至21日(即该运动的第一周)的完整推文及相关元数据。我们研究了美国境内包含“MeToo”短语的全新英文推文内容(N = 11935条)。我们使用机器学习方法、最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归以及支持向量机模型,对那些揭露性侵和虐待以及此类事件早期生活经历的单条推文内容进行总结和分类。

结果

我们发现,最具预测性的词汇勾勒出了性侵和虐待揭露的生动原型。然后我们估计,在运动的第一周,11%包含“MeToo”的全新英文推文披露了发帖人性侵或虐待经历的细节,5.8%披露了此类事件的早期生活经历。我们研究了性侵和虐待推文发布者的人口统计学构成,发现25至50岁的白人女性在推特上的占比过高。此外,我们发现性侵和虐待个人经历的大量分享传播范围广泛,在运动的第一周,600万至3400万推特用户可能看到了他们关注的人发布的此类第一人称揭露内容。

结论

这些数据表明,所分享的揭露内容不仅限于承认曾遭受性骚扰,还常常包括对性侵和虐待早期生活经历的生动且创伤性的描述。这些发现和方法凸显了在新颖机器学习方法支持下的内容分析的价值,有助于我们更好地理解这些揭露的广泛程度,这可能放大了“MeToo”运动的传播范围和显著性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/ea71026c2b51/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/f7a30d5c915c/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/7c383349b3c3/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/af10203e12d0/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/ea71026c2b51/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/f7a30d5c915c/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/7c383349b3c3/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/af10203e12d0/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28be/6751092/ea71026c2b51/jmir_v21i9e13837_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
The #MeToo Movement in the United States: Text Analysis of Early Twitter Conversations.美国的#MeToo运动:早期推特对话的文本分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 3;21(9):e13837. doi: 10.2196/13837.
2
#MeToo and Google Inquiries Into Sexual Violence: A Hashtag Campaign Can Sustain Information Seeking.#MeToo 运动和谷歌对性暴力的调查:标签运动可以持续推动信息检索。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):9857-9867. doi: 10.1177/0886260519868197. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
3
Social Media Activism and Convergence in Tweet Topics After the Initial #MeToo Movement for Two Distinct Groups of Twitter Users.社交媒体行动主义与“我也是”运动初期之后两个不同群体的推特用户在推特点题上的融合。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13603-NP13622. doi: 10.1177/08862605211001481. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Negative Attitudes and Beliefs Toward the #MeToo Movement on Twitter.对 #MeToo 运动在 Twitter 上的负面态度和看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13018-NP13044. doi: 10.1177/08862605211001470. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
"I never told anyone until the #metoo movement": What can we learn from sexual abuse and sexual assault disclosures made through social media?“直到 #metoo 运动我才告诉任何人”:我们能从社交媒体上披露的性虐待和性侵犯中吸取什么教训?
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 May;103:104312. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104312. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
#MeToo: Disclosure and Response to Sexual Victimization on Twitter.#MeToo:推特上性侵犯的披露与回应。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8257-8288. doi: 10.1177/0886260519851211. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
The #MeToo Movement and Perceptions of Sexual Assault: College Students' Recognition of Sexual Assault Experiences Over Time.#MeToo运动与性侵犯认知:大学生对性侵犯经历的长期认知
Psychol Violence. 2021 Mar;11(2):209-218. doi: 10.1037/vio0000363. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
Using Twitter-Based Data for Sexual Violence Research: Scoping Review.利用推特数据进行性暴力研究:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 15;25:e46084. doi: 10.2196/46084.
9
Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.应用多种数据收集工具量化推特上的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗传播情况
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 5;18(12):e318. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6670.
10
Demographic Representation and Collective Storytelling in the Me Too Twitter Hashtag Activism Movement.“Me Too”推特标签维权运动中的人口统计学代表性及集体叙事
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2021 Apr;5(CSCW1). doi: 10.1145/3449181.

引用本文的文献

1
Online and Offline Disclosures of Unwanted Sexual Experiences: A Comparison of Reactions and Affect.非自愿性性经历的线上与线下披露:反应与情感的比较
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;15(2):102. doi: 10.3390/bs15020102.
2
Cross-sectional examination of correlates of sexual victimization disclosure via #MeToo.通过#MeToo 对性受害披露的相关性进行横断面检查。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2291932. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2291932. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
3
Using Twitter-Based Data for Sexual Violence Research: Scoping Review.利用推特数据进行性暴力研究:范围综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Internet Searches for Sexual Harassment and Assault, Reporting, and Training Since the #MeToo Movement.自#MeToo 运动以来,针对性骚扰和性侵犯的网络搜索、报告和培训。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):258-259. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5094.
2
A content analysis of depression-related Tweets.与抑郁症相关推文的内容分析。
Comput Human Behav. 2016 Jan 1;54:351-357. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.023.
3
Mechanisms Underlying Sexual Violence Exposure and Psychosocial Sequelae: A Theoretical and Empirical Review.性暴力暴露与心理社会后遗症的潜在机制:理论与实证综述
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 15;25:e46084. doi: 10.2196/46084.
4
Demographic Representation and Collective Storytelling in the Me Too Twitter Hashtag Activism Movement.“Me Too”推特标签维权运动中的人口统计学代表性及集体叙事
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2021 Apr;5(CSCW1). doi: 10.1145/3449181.
5
Understanding Discussions of Sexual Assault in Young Women on a Peer Support Mental Health App: A Content Analysis.理解青年女性在同伴支持心理健康应用程序上讨论性侵犯问题:一项内容分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22811-NP22833. doi: 10.1177/08862605211073112. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
6
Deep Learning for Identification of Alcohol-Related Content on Social Media (Reddit and Twitter): Exploratory Analysis of Alcohol-Related Outcomes.社交媒体(Reddit 和 Twitter)上的酒精相关内容的深度学习识别:酒精相关结果的探索性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 15;23(9):e27314. doi: 10.2196/27314.
7
Negative Attitudes and Beliefs Toward the #MeToo Movement on Twitter.对 #MeToo 运动在 Twitter 上的负面态度和看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13018-NP13044. doi: 10.1177/08862605211001470. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
Partisan public health: how does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation?党派性公共卫生:政治意识形态如何影响对新冠疫情相关错误信息的支持?
J Comput Soc Sci. 2020;3(2):319-342. doi: 10.1007/s42001-020-00089-2. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
9
The Hidden Pandemic of Family Violence During COVID-19: Unsupervised Learning of Tweets.新冠疫情期间家庭暴力的隐性大流行:推文的无监督学习
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 6;22(11):e24361. doi: 10.2196/24361.
Clin Psychol (New York). 2012 Sep;19(3):260-275. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12004.
4
Twitter chatter about marijuana.推特上关于大麻的热议。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Feb;56(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.270.
5
Characterizing the followers and tweets of a marijuana-focused Twitter handle.对一个专注于大麻的推特账号的关注者和推文进行特征分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 27;16(6):e157. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3247.
6
Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak.推特时代的大流行疫情:2009 年 H1N1 爆发期间推文的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118.