• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从麦基翁手术到艾弗·刘易斯手术,前100例机器人辅助食管癌切除术的胸段淋巴结清扫学习曲线:一项回顾性研究。

From McKeown to Ivor Lewis, the learning curve for thoracic lymphadenectomy over the first 100 robotic esophagectomy cases: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Zhuo Ze-Guo, Li Gang, Song Tie-Niu, Alai Gu-Ha, Shen Xu, Wang Yun, Lin Yi-Dan

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1543-1552. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2862.

DOI:10.21037/jtd-20-2862
PMID:33841946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8024862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymphadenectomy is an essential but challenging part of the surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. However, the previously reported learning curve for robotic esophagectomy primarily focused on only one surgical approach (McKeown or Ivor Lewis). However, both approaches must be mastered by a mature robotic surgical team to deal with different clinical conditions and satisfy patients' needs. This study aimed to show how an experienced esophageal surgical team became proficient in both McKeown and Ivor Lewis robotic esophagectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the first 100 cases of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) by a single surgical team was performed. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to distinguish the change point during the learning course. A subgroup analysis was performed according to a surgical approach (McKeown or Ivor Lewis) to determine the effect of experience from one surgical approach on learning the other RAMIE technique.

RESULTS

According to the tendency of the CUSUM plot, the learning curve was divided into four phases. The subgroup analysis indicated the decline of the CUSUM plot in the 3rd phase originated from the start of the Ivor Lewis approach. The attending surgeon took 23 cases to achieve a significant improvement in the number of harvested thoracic lymph nodes using the McKeown approach. Regardless of the acquired experience of McKeown RAMIE, it took another 18 cases for the surgical team to achieve significant improvement in harvesting thoracic lymph nodes using the Ivor Lewis approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-three cases were needed for an experienced surgical team to improve thoracic lymphadenectomy results using McKeown RAMIE. There was another learning phase during the transition from McKeown to Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Importantly, the acquired experience from performing McKeown RAMIE could shorten how long it takes to learn Ivor Lewis RAMIE.

摘要

背景

淋巴结清扫是食管癌手术治疗的重要组成部分,但具有挑战性。然而,先前报道的机器人食管癌切除术的学习曲线主要仅关注一种手术方式(麦克尤恩或艾弗·刘易斯)。然而,一个成熟的机器人手术团队必须掌握这两种方式,以应对不同的临床情况并满足患者需求。本研究旨在展示一个经验丰富的食管外科团队如何熟练掌握麦克尤恩和艾弗·刘易斯机器人食管癌切除术。

方法

对由单一手术团队进行的前100例机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术(RAMIE)进行回顾性分析。采用累积和(CUSUM)分析来区分学习过程中的变化点。根据手术方式(麦克尤恩或艾弗·刘易斯)进行亚组分析,以确定一种手术方式的经验对学习另一种RAMIE技术的影响。

结果

根据CUSUM图的趋势,学习曲线分为四个阶段。亚组分析表明,第三阶段CUSUM图的下降源于艾弗·刘易斯手术方式的开始。主刀医生采用麦克尤恩手术方式进行23例手术后,在获取胸段淋巴结数量方面有显著改善无论之前在麦克尤恩RAMIE方面积累了多少经验,手术团队采用艾弗·刘易斯手术方式获取胸段淋巴结数量再有显著改善还需要18例手术。

结论

经验丰富的手术团队采用麦克尤恩RAMIE改善胸段淋巴结清扫结果需要23例手术。从麦克尤恩食管癌切除术过渡到艾弗·刘易斯食管癌切除术还有另一个学习阶段。重要的是,进行麦克尤恩RAMIE所获得的经验可以缩短学习艾弗·刘易斯RAMIE所需的时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c189/8024862/82c0a14dcd65/jtd-13-03-1543-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c189/8024862/5ce042e89a87/jtd-13-03-1543-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c189/8024862/82c0a14dcd65/jtd-13-03-1543-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c189/8024862/5ce042e89a87/jtd-13-03-1543-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c189/8024862/82c0a14dcd65/jtd-13-03-1543-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
From McKeown to Ivor Lewis, the learning curve for thoracic lymphadenectomy over the first 100 robotic esophagectomy cases: a retrospective study.从麦基翁手术到艾弗·刘易斯手术,前100例机器人辅助食管癌切除术的胸段淋巴结清扫学习曲线:一项回顾性研究。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1543-1552. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2862.
2
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.达芬奇机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术与 McKeown 食管切除术治疗中下段食管癌的临床疗效比较:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8271-8277. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14208-6. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
3
[Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].[微创食管癌切除术中Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown术式的短期疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):888-91.
4
Robot-assisted esophagogastric reconstruction in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.机器人辅助下微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术中的食管胃重建术
J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1860-1866. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.29.
5
Learning curve for robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的学习曲线。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Feb 11;35(2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doab026.
6
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Meticulous surgery minimizing postoperative complications.机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术:精细手术可减少术后并发症。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Aug 16;4(6):608-617. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12390. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
[Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].[微创Ivor-Lewis与微创McKeown食管癌切除术围手术期并发症的临床观察]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 23;44(6):577-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200704-00626.
8
Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.机器人辅助经胸食管切除术机器人吻合术(Ivor Lewis):手术技术和早期结果。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):941-952. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01439-7. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
9
End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 微创食管切除术(RAMIE)中末端到侧的圆形吻合术。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Aug 13;35(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doab088.
10
Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.机器人辅助与开放Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术:更精确的淋巴结清扫且不增加吻合口漏发生率。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1109-1115. doi: 10.1002/jso.27246. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.食管和胃食管交界处癌,2019 年第 2 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):855-883. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.
2
Learning curve and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的学习曲线及术后结果
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S777-S785. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.54.
3
How many lymph nodes should be dissected in esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant therapy to get accurate staging?
食管癌根治术(包括新辅助治疗)需要清扫多少枚淋巴结才能获得准确分期?
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Jan 16;33(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz009.
4
Lymph Node Harvest as a Measure of Quality and Effect on Overall Survival in Esophageal Cancer: A National Cancer Database Assessment.淋巴结清扫作为食管癌质量指标及其对总生存的影响:一项国家癌症数据库评估
Am Surg. 2019 Feb 1;85(2):201-205.
5
Modified Intrathoracic Esophagogastrostomy with Minimally Invasive Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer.改良胸腔内食管胃吻合术联合微创机器人辅助 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术治疗癌症。
Dig Surg. 2019;36(3):218-225. doi: 10.1159/000495361. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸经胸食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
7
Comparison of Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Ivor-Lewis, Mckeown, or Sweet Esophagectomy.Ivor-Lewis、Mckeown 或 Sweet 食管癌根治术后患者长期生活质量比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):225-231. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3999-z. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
The Learning Curve for Robotic McKeown Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.机器人辅助 McKeown 食管癌根治术学习曲线。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Apr;105(4):1024-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.058. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
9
A study of the learning curve for robotic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.机器人食管癌根治术学习曲线的研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Apr 1;53(4):862-870. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx440.
10
Learning curve for robotic esophagectomy and dissection of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes for esophageal cancer.机器人食管癌切除术及双侧喉返神经淋巴结清扫的学习曲线
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Dec 1;30(12):1-9. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox094.