Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助下微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术中的食管胃重建术

Robot-assisted esophagogastric reconstruction in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

作者信息

Wang Zihao, Zhang Hanlu, Wang Fuqiang, Wang Yun

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1860-1866. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer has increased considerably in recent years, the application of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, especially in East Asia, is still much rarer than the McKeown approach. The reconstruction of the alimentary tract is one of the main technical challenges under traditional endoscopy. The robotic surgical system with high-resolution 3D images and multiarticulate instruments may help simplify this procedure. Here, we describe our experience in the gastric tube and esophagogastric anastomosis construction, and the initial clinical results for Ivor Lewis robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients undergoing Ivor Lewis RAMIE with circular stapled anastomosis at a single institution from December 2016 to June 2018 was performed. Operative and postoperative outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients [median age, 63 years (range, 49-77 years)] underwent Ivor Lewis RAMIE during the study period with a four-arm robotic platform. Four patients (16.7%) received neoadjuvant therapy. The median estimated blood loss was 120 mL (range, 50-210 mL). The median operating time was 352.5 min (range, 259-485 min). There was no conversion to an open surgical procedure. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 (12.5%) patients. Complications included pneumonia in two patients (8.3%) and mediastinitis in 1 (4.2%). The median stay in the intensive care unit was 1 d (range, 0-8 d) and the median postoperative hospital stay was 11 d (range, 8-30 d). All patients had an R0 resection. The median number of nodes removed was 19 (range, 11-30) and the median number of positive nodes removed was 1 (range, 0-8).

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial results indicate that Ivor Lewis RAMIE may be a safe and feasible alternative to open and endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

摘要

背景

尽管近年来食管胃交界癌的发病率显著上升,但微创艾弗·刘易斯食管切除术的应用,尤其是在东亚地区,仍比麦克基翁术式少见得多。传统内镜下消化道重建是主要技术挑战之一。具有高分辨率3D图像和多关节器械的机器人手术系统可能有助于简化这一过程。在此,我们描述了我们在胃管和食管胃吻合术构建方面的经验,以及艾弗·刘易斯机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)的初步临床结果。

方法

对2016年12月至2018年6月在单一机构接受艾弗·刘易斯RAMIE并采用圆形吻合器吻合的所有患者进行回顾性研究。记录手术和术后结果。

结果

在研究期间,24例患者[中位年龄63岁(范围49 - 77岁)]使用四臂机器人平台接受了艾弗·刘易斯RAMIE。4例患者(16.7%)接受了新辅助治疗。中位估计失血量为120 mL(范围50 - 210 mL)。中位手术时间为352.5分钟(范围259 - 485分钟)。无转为开放手术的情况。3例(12.5%)患者发生术后并发症。并发症包括2例(8.3%)肺炎和1例(4.2%)纵隔炎。重症监护病房的中位住院时间为1天(范围0 - 8天),术后中位住院时间为11天(范围8 - 30天)。所有患者均实现R0切除。切除淋巴结的中位数量为19个(范围11 - 30个),切除阳性淋巴结的中位数量为1个(范围0 - 8个)。

结论

我们的初步结果表明艾弗·刘易斯RAMIE可能是开放和内镜下艾弗·刘易斯食管切除术的一种安全可行的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted esophagogastric reconstruction in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1860-1866. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.29.
2
Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):941-952. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01439-7. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy With Real-Time Perfusion Assessment.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;100(3):947-52. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.084. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
7
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.
Rozhl Chir. 2023;102(11):422-429. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.422-429.
10
Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1675-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08715-4. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

2
Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1675-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08715-4. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

2
The Learning Curve for Robotic McKeown Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Apr;105(4):1024-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.058. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
3
Short-Term Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy: A Population-Based Study from Finland and Sweden.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):326-332. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6212-9. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
Contribution of robotics to minimally invasive esophagectomy.
J Robot Surg. 2013 Dec;7(4):325-32. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0391-y. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
9
Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3873-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4692-x. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
10
Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis.
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1073-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验