Zhang Xi-Xuan, Song Chun-Tao, Gao Zhen, Zhou Bin, Wang Hai-Bo, Gong Qiang, Li Ben, Guo Qiang, Li He-Fei
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):1624-1640. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3039.
Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) generally involves endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. However, inevitably, this may cause intubation-related complications and prolong the postoperative recovery process. Gradually, non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS) is increasingly being utilized. However, its safety and efficacy remain controversial.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 2020 were selected from the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases and included in this study according to the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers screened these RCTs and independently extracted the relevant data. After assessing the risk of bias in these RCTs, a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Pooled data were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model.
Meta-analysis data demonstrated that the mean difference (MD) in the length of hospital stay between non-intubated patients and intubated patients was -1.41 days, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of -2.47 to -0.34 (P=0.01). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score between the two groups showed a MD of -0.34 (95% CI: -0.58 to -0.10; P=0.006). Patients who underwent NIVATS presented with lower rates of overall complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.41; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.67; P=0.0004], air leak (OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.87; P=0.02), pharyngeal discomfort (OR 0.08; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.17; P<0.00001), hoarseness (OR 0.06; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.21; P<0.00001), and gastrointestinal reactions (OR 0.23; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.53; P=0.0005) compared to intubated patients. The anesthesia satisfaction scores in the NIVATS group were significantly higher than those of the VATS group (MD 0.50; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.88; P=0.009). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of operation time (MD 0.90 hours; 95% CI: -0.23 to 2.03; P=0.12) and surgical field satisfaction (1 point) (OR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.59; P=0.43) between the two groups.
NIVATS is a safe and feasible form of intervention that can reduce the postoperative pain and complications of various systems and shorten hospital stay duration without prolonging the operation time.
电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)通常需要在全身麻醉下进行气管插管。然而,这不可避免地可能导致与插管相关的并发症,并延长术后恢复过程。逐渐地,非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术(NIVATS)的应用越来越多。然而,其安全性和有效性仍存在争议。
从Cochrane图书馆、科学网、PubMed、Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中选取截至2020年8月发表的随机对照试验(RCT),并根据纳入标准纳入本研究。两名评审员筛选这些RCT,并独立提取相关数据。在评估这些RCT的偏倚风险后,使用Review Manager 5.3进行荟萃分析。汇总数据采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
荟萃分析数据表明,非插管患者与插管患者住院时间的平均差值(MD)为-1.41天,95%置信区间(CI)为-2.47至-0.34(P=0.01)。两组之间的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分显示MD为-0.34(95%CI:-0.58至-0.10;P=0.006)。与插管患者相比,接受NIVATS的患者总体并发症发生率较低[比值比(OR)0.41;95%CI:0.25至0.67;P=0.0004]、漏气发生率较低(OR 0.45;95%CI:0.24至0.87;P=0.02)、咽部不适发生率较低(OR 0.