O'Kula Susanna S, Faillace Lisa, Kulick-Soper Catherine V, Reyes-Esteves Sahily, Raab Jackie, Davis Kathryn A, Kheder Ammar, Hill Chloe E
Department of Neurology (SSO'K), New York University; Department of Neurology (LF, CVK-S, SR-E, KAD), University of Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (JR), Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (AK), Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Department of Neurology (CEH), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;11(2):127-133. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000815.
The ictal examination is crucial for neuroanatomic localization of seizure onset, which informs medical and neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy. Substantial variation exists in ictal examination performance in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). We developed and implemented a standardized examination to facilitate rapid, reliable execution of all testing domains and adherence to patient safety maneuvers.
Following observation of examination performance, root cause analysis of barriers, and review of consensus guidelines, an ictal examination was developed and disseminated. In accordance with quality improvement methodology, revisions were enacted following the initial intervention, including differentiation between pathways for convulsive and nonconvulsive seizures. We evaluated ictal examination fidelity, efficiency, and EMU staff satisfaction before and after the intervention.
We identified barriers to ictal examination performance as confusion regarding ictal examination protocol, inadequate education of the rationale for the examination and its components, and lack of awareness of patient-specific goals. Over an 18-month period, 100 ictal examinations were reviewed, 50 convulsive and 50 nonconvulsive. Ictal examination performance varied during the study period without sustained improvement for convulsive or nonconvulsive seizure examination. The new examination was faster to perform (0.8 vs 1.5 minutes). Postintervention, EMU staff expressed satisfaction with the examination, but many still did not understand why certain components were performed.
We identified key barriers to EMU ictal assessment and completed real-world testing of a standardized, streamlined ictal examination. We found it challenging to reliably change ictal examination performance in our EMU; further study of implementation is warranted.
发作期检查对于癫痫发作起始的神经解剖定位至关重要,可为癫痫的药物治疗和神经外科治疗提供依据。癫痫监测单元(EMU)的发作期检查表现存在很大差异。我们制定并实施了一项标准化检查,以促进所有测试领域的快速、可靠执行,并确保遵守患者安全措施。
在观察检查表现、对障碍进行根本原因分析以及审查共识指南后,制定并传播了发作期检查。根据质量改进方法,在初始干预后进行了修订,包括区分惊厥性和非惊厥性癫痫发作的检查路径。我们评估了干预前后发作期检查的准确性、效率以及EMU工作人员的满意度。
我们确定发作期检查表现的障碍包括对发作期检查方案的困惑、对检查及其组成部分的基本原理教育不足以及对患者特定目标缺乏认识。在18个月的时间里,审查了100次发作期检查,其中50次为惊厥性发作,50次为非惊厥性发作。在研究期间,发作期检查表现有所变化,惊厥性或非惊厥性癫痫发作检查均未持续改善。新的检查执行速度更快(0.8分钟对1.5分钟)。干预后,EMU工作人员对检查表示满意,但许多人仍然不明白为什么要进行某些检查项目。
我们确定了EMU发作期评估的关键障碍,并完成了标准化、简化的发作期检查的实际测试。我们发现在我们的EMU中可靠地改变发作期检查表现具有挑战性;有必要对实施情况进行进一步研究。