Khalid Mohamed
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kamal Medical Polyclinics, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2021 Jan-Mar;11(1):9-13. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_306_19. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Urinary tract infections (UTI) are one of the most frequent infections encountered in hospital settings as well as in community, making urine the most cultured specimens in laboratories across the world. Urine samples occupy most of the time and manpower in the form of resources in the microbiology laboratories. The microbiological performance of HiCrome UTI agar was compared with cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar for isolation and presumptive identification of bacteria from urine culture with ease of reporting with less human resource and reduction in the cost.
The study was conducted in a total of 208 collected midstream catch urine samples from patients attending the Department of Microbiology, Khartoum Teaching Hospital Central Laboratories. Urine samples received in the bacteriology laboratory were inoculated on CLED agar and for HiCrome UTI agar simultaneously and incubated overnight. Isolates were identified by the colony's color for HiCrome UTI agar and by standard microbiological techniques for CLED agar.
Out of 208 urine samples tested, significant growth was obtained in 94 (45.2%) plates of CLED agar and 84 (40.4%) of HiCrome UTI; moreover, 15 (7.2%) and 28 (13.5%) plates showed mixed with no growth observed in 99 (47.6%) and 96 (46.1%) on CLED agar and HiCrome UTI agar, respectively. The rate of presumptive identification was found significantly higher on HiCrome UTI agar (94%) than CLED agar (84%) ( < 0.05) as the primary urine culture medium. out of 43 (100%) polymicrobial growths 28 (65.1%) were demonstrated distinctly on HiCrome UTI agar and only 15 (34.9%)were obtained fromCLED agar.
HiCrome UTI agar was found to be more useful as a primary urine culture medium in both higher rate of isolation and presumptive identification of uropathogens in comparison to conventional media. Its inherent characteristics in demonstrating polymicrobial growth and ease of rapid identification by distinct colony color are unique.
尿路感染(UTI)是医院环境和社区中最常见的感染之一,这使得尿液成为全球实验室中培养最多的标本。在微生物实验室中,尿液样本在资源方面占用了大部分时间和人力。将HiCrome UTI琼脂与半胱氨酸乳糖电解质缺乏(CLED)琼脂在从尿培养物中分离和初步鉴定细菌方面的微生物学性能进行比较,以便更轻松地报告结果,减少人力资源并降低成本。
该研究共对喀土穆教学医院中央实验室微生物科收治患者的208份中段尿样本进行了检测。细菌学实验室收到的尿液样本同时接种在CLED琼脂和HiCrome UTI琼脂上,并孵育过夜。HiCrome UTI琼脂通过菌落颜色鉴定分离株,CLED琼脂则通过标准微生物技术鉴定。
在检测的208份尿液样本中,CLED琼脂平板上有94份(45.2%)获得显著生长,HiCrome UTI琼脂平板上有84份(40.4%);此外,分别有15份(7.2%)和28份(13.5%)平板显示混合生长,CLED琼脂和HiCrome UTI琼脂上分别有99份(47.6%)和96份(46.1%)未观察到生长。作为主要尿培养基,HiCrome UTI琼脂上的初步鉴定率(94%)显著高于CLED琼脂(84%)(P<0.05)。在43份(100%)混合菌生长样本中,HiCrome UTI琼脂上有28份(65.1%)能清晰显示,而CLED琼脂上仅获得15份(34.9%)。
与传统培养基相比,HiCrome UTI琼脂作为主要尿培养基在分离和初步鉴定尿路病原体方面更有用。它在显示混合菌生长以及通过独特菌落颜色进行快速鉴定方面的固有特性是独一无二的。