Vadivelu Nisha, Parmar Rashmika D, Shingala Hitesh, Mehta Krunal D
Department of Microbiology, M.P. Shah Government Medical College, Jamnagar, India.
Afr J Lab Med. 2025 Feb 10;14(1):2551. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v14i1.2551. eCollection 2025.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are prevalent bacterial infections, necessitating rapid and accurate diagnosis for timely treatment. Conventional culture techniques, such as cystine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar, can delay treatment and contribute to inappropriate antibiotic use. Not much is known about alternatives such as chromogenic UTI agar.
The study aimed to assess the performance of chromogenic UTI agar compared to conventional methods for identifying uropathogens, especially in polymicrobial infections, and to determine its sensitivity, specificity, time efficiency, and cost-effectiveness for UTI diagnosis.
An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2024 to June 2024 in the Microbiology Department of M.P. Shah Government Medical College in Jamnagar, Gujarat, India. Urine samples from patients with suspected UTIs ( = 250) were processed using both chromogenic UTI agar and CLED agar. The performance of chromogenic UTI agar was assessed for pathogen identification, detection of polymicrobial infections, time to results, and cost-effectiveness.
Chromogenic UTI agar detected single bacterial growth in 63/250 (25.2%) samples, and mixed bacterial growth in 24/250 (9.6%) samples, whereas CLED agar showed single bacterial growth in 67/250 (26.8%) samples and mixed bacterial growth in 10/250 (4%). The chromogenic medium provided preliminary results 5.5 h earlier ( < 0.001) and final results 24 h earlier ( < 0.001) than conventional methods. Cost analysis revealed a 33% reduction per-test cost using chromogenic UTI agar ( < 0.001).
Chromogenic UTI agar demonstrated excellent performance in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of UTIs, including improved detection of polymicrobial infections.
When it comes to diagnosing UTIs, chromogenic UTI agar has several benefits over traditional techniques, such as high accuracy, enhanced detection of polymicrobial infections, and cost-effectiveness. The research backs up the inclusion of chromogenic medium in standard UTI diagnosis procedures.
尿路感染(UTIs)是常见的细菌感染,需要快速准确的诊断以便及时治疗。传统培养技术,如胱氨酸乳糖电解质缺乏(CLED)琼脂,可能会延误治疗并导致抗生素使用不当。对于诸如显色性UTI琼脂等替代方法,人们了解得并不多。
本研究旨在评估显色性UTI琼脂与传统方法相比在鉴定尿路病原体方面的性能,尤其是在混合菌感染中,并确定其在UTI诊断中的敏感性、特异性、时间效率和成本效益。
2024年3月至2024年6月在印度古吉拉特邦贾姆讷格尔的M.P.沙阿政府医学院微生物学系进行了一项观察性横断面研究。对疑似UTIs患者(n = 250)的尿液样本同时使用显色性UTI琼脂和CLED琼脂进行处理。评估显色性UTI琼脂在病原体鉴定、混合菌感染检测、出结果时间和成本效益方面的性能。
显色性UTI琼脂在63/250(25.2%)的样本中检测到单一细菌生长,在24/250(9.6%)的样本中检测到混合细菌生长,而CLED琼脂在67/250(26.8%)的样本中显示单一细菌生长,在10/250(4%)的样本中显示混合细菌生长。与传统方法相比,显色性培养基提供初步结果早5.5小时(P < 0.001),提供最终结果早24小时(P < 0.001)。成本分析显示使用显色性UTI琼脂每次检测成本降低33%(P < 0.001)。
显色性UTI琼脂在UTIs的快速准确诊断中表现出色,包括在混合菌感染检测方面有所改善。
在诊断UTIs方面,显色性UTI琼脂比传统技术有诸多优势,如高精度、增强的混合菌感染检测能力和成本效益。该研究支持将显色性培养基纳入标准UTI诊断程序。