Dia Maya, Paccalet Alexandre, Pillot Bruno, Leon Christelle, Ovize Michel, Crola Da Silva Claire, Bochaton Thomas, Paillard Melanie
Laboratoire CarMeN-équipe IRIS, INSERM, INRA, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, INSA-Lyon, Univ-Lyon, Bron, France.
Laboratory of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University-Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 26;8:660698. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.660698. eCollection 2021.
In front of the failure to translate from bench to bedside cardioprotective drugs against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion, research scientists are currently revising their animal models. Owing to its growing incidence nowadays, type 2 diabetes (T2D) represents one of the main risk factors of co-morbidities in myocardial infarction. However, discrepancies exist between reported animal and human studies. Our aim was here to compare the impact of diabetes on cell death after cardiac ischemia-reperfusion in a human cohort of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with a diet-induced mouse model of T2D, using a high-fat high-sucrose diet for 16 weeks (HFHSD). Interestingly, a small fraction (<14%) of patients undergoing a myocardial infarct were diabetic, but treated, and did not show a bigger infarct size when compared to non-diabetic patients. On the contrary, HFHSD mice displayed an increased infarct size after an cardiac ischemia-reperfusion, together with an increased cell death after an hypoxia-reoxygenation on isolated cardiomyocytes. To mimic the diabetic patients' medication profile, 6 weeks of oral gavage with Metformin was performed in the HFHSD mouse group. Metformin treatment of the HFHSD mice led to a similar extent of lower cell death after hypoxia-reoxygenation as in the standard diet group, compared to the HFHSD cardiomyocytes. Altogether, our data highlight that due to their potential protective effect, anti-diabetic medications should be included in pre-clinical study of cardioprotective approaches. Moreover, since diabetic patients represent only a minor fraction of the STEMI patients, diabetic animal models may not be the most suitable translatable model to humans, unlike aging that appears as a common feature of all infarcted patients.
在将针对心肌缺血再灌注的心脏保护药物从实验室转化到临床应用失败的情况下,科研人员目前正在修订他们的动物模型。由于2型糖尿病(T2D)如今发病率不断上升,它是心肌梗死合并症的主要风险因素之一。然而,已报道的动物研究和人体研究之间存在差异。我们的目的是在此比较糖尿病对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者人群心脏缺血再灌注后细胞死亡的影响,并与采用高脂高糖饮食16周(HFHSD)诱导的T2D小鼠模型进行对比。有趣的是,一小部分(<14%)发生心肌梗死的患者患有糖尿病,但接受了治疗,与非糖尿病患者相比,他们并未表现出更大的梗死面积。相反,HFHSD小鼠在心脏缺血再灌注后梗死面积增加,同时分离的心肌细胞在缺氧复氧后细胞死亡增加。为模拟糖尿病患者的用药情况,对HFHSD小鼠组进行了6周的二甲双胍灌胃。与HFHSD心肌细胞相比,二甲双胍治疗的HFHSD小鼠在缺氧复氧后细胞死亡降低的程度与标准饮食组相似。总之,我们的数据表明,由于其潜在的保护作用,抗糖尿病药物应纳入心脏保护方法的临床前研究。此外,由于糖尿病患者仅占STEMI患者的一小部分,与所有梗死患者都具有的衰老这一共同特征不同,糖尿病动物模型可能不是最适合转化到人类的模型。