Suppr超能文献

《有点偏见》:通过避孕案例看医学和偏见管理。

"We're a Little Biased": Medicine and the Management of Bias through the Case of Contraception.

机构信息

University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

出版信息

J Health Soc Behav. 2021 Jun;62(2):120-135. doi: 10.1177/00221465211003232. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

Abstract

There is a wealth of literature demonstrating the presence of bias throughout the American health care system. Despite acknowledging such presence, however, little is known about how bias functions within medical encounters, particularly how providers grapple with bias in their patient counseling and decision-making. We explore such processes through the case of contraceptive counseling, a highly raced, classed, and gendered context. In-depth interviews with 51 health care providers reveal that providers use four primary strategies to navigate and minimize bias in their care-using scientific rationale, employing "safe" biases, standardizing counseling, and implementing patient-centered care. Paradoxically, using these strategies can exacerbate rather than resolve bias. Understanding these bias management strategies reveals provider-held biases, how they manifest within appointments, and the potential consequences for patients' health autonomy. Such knowledge informs interventions that promote contraceptive use among women in the United States, addresses bias in health care broadly, and thus ultimately helps combat health disparities.

摘要

美国的医疗体系中存在着大量的偏见,这方面的文献不胜枚举。然而,尽管人们已经认识到了这种偏见的存在,却很少有人了解偏见在医患互动中是如何起作用的,尤其是提供者在患者咨询和决策过程中如何应对偏见。我们通过避孕咨询的案例来探讨这些过程,因为这是一个高度种族化、阶级化和性别化的背景。对 51 名医疗保健提供者的深入访谈显示,提供者使用四种主要策略来应对和最小化他们护理中的偏见——使用科学原理、运用“安全”的偏见、标准化咨询以及实施以患者为中心的护理。具有讽刺意味的是,使用这些策略可能会加剧而不是解决偏见。了解这些偏见管理策略揭示了提供者所持有的偏见、它们在预约中是如何表现的,以及对患者健康自主权的潜在影响。这些知识可以为在美国促进妇女使用避孕药具的干预措施提供信息,广泛解决医疗保健中的偏见问题,从而最终有助于消除健康差距。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验