• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者是否从控制阶梯疗法的立法中受益?

Do patients benefit from legislation regulating step therapy?

机构信息

Global Healthy Living Foundation, Nyack, NY, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Jul;17(3):282-297. doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000153. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1017/S1744133121000153
PMID:33843568
Abstract

Step therapy, also termed , describes a practice of insurance and pharmacy benefit management companies denying reimbursement for a specific treatment until after other treatments have first been found ineffective (i.e. failed). Laws to limit step therapy have been passed in 29 states of the United States. Using extrapolated data on fully insured employees, we find that except for New York and New Mexico, enacted State laws don't apply to even one-third of a state's population. Using the more robust Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) data, which do not include fully insured employees, we find that only 2-10% of a state's population is covered. Advocating for these laws has been an expensive and time-consuming process, likely to become more so for the 21 states without such laws. The laws that have been enacted can be near impossible, to enforce, and loopholes exist. As a result, using KFF data, more than 90% of people in the United States with health insurance may still be unable to access the treatment chosen as most appropriate for them with their physician. Based on these data, we conclude federal step-therapy legislation is needed.

摘要

阶梯式疗法,也称为,描述了一种保险和药品福利管理公司的做法,即在其他治疗方法首先被证明无效(即失败)之前,拒绝为特定治疗提供报销。美国 29 个州已经通过了限制阶梯式疗法的法律。根据对完全参保员工的外推数据,我们发现,除了纽约州和新墨西哥州外,即使是州内三分之一的人口也不受已颁布的州法律的约束。使用更可靠的凯撒家庭基金会(KFF)数据(不包括完全参保的员工),我们发现只有 2-10%的州人口受到覆盖。倡导这些法律是一个昂贵且耗时的过程,对于没有这些法律的 21 个州来说,可能会变得更加困难。已经颁布的法律可能难以执行,并且存在漏洞。因此,根据 KFF 数据,超过 90%的有医疗保险的美国人可能仍然无法获得他们的医生认为最适合他们的治疗方法。基于这些数据,我们得出结论,需要联邦阶梯式疗法立法。

相似文献

1
Do patients benefit from legislation regulating step therapy?患者是否从控制阶梯疗法的立法中受益?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Jul;17(3):282-297. doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000153. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.工作场所中的大麻:职业健康专业人员和雇主指南:美国职业健康护士协会与美国职业与环境医学学院联合指南声明
Workplace Health Saf. 2015 Apr;63(4):139-64. doi: 10.1177/2165079915581983. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
3
Evolution of a children's health insurance program: lessons from New York State's Child Health Plus.儿童健康保险计划的演变:来自纽约州儿童健康加项计划的经验教训。
Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3 Suppl E):692-6.
4
The evolution of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in New York: changing program features and enrollee characteristics.纽约州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的发展:项目特征与参保人特点的变化
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e542.
5
Out-of-Pocket and Health Care Spending Changes for Patients Using Orally Administered Anticancer Therapy After Adoption of State Parity Laws.州平价法实施后口服抗癌治疗患者自付费用和医疗支出变化。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 14;4(6):e173598. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3598.
6
Prompt-pay legislation: is it a solution?即时支付立法:它是一种解决方案吗?
Manag Care Interface. 2004 Aug;17(8):54-7, 66.
7
Impact of state laws that extend eligibility for parents' health insurance coverage to young adults.州法律对扩大父母医疗保险覆盖范围至年轻成年人的影响。
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):426-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1505. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
8
Redefining the "Public Option": Lessons from Washington State and New Mexico.重新定义“公共选择”:华盛顿州和新墨西哥州的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):260-278. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12454. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
9
The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.美国影响堕胎的法律及其对女性健康的影响。
Nurse Pract. 1991 Dec;16(12):53-9. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199112000-00013.
10
Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.堕胎保险范围在公共和私人保险计划中都存在争议。
State Reprod Health Monit. 1996 Sep;7(3):5-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Step Therapy on Individuals with Psoriatic Disease in the USA: Patient and Provider Perspectives.阶梯治疗对美国银屑病患者的影响:患者及医疗服务提供者的观点
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01430-1.
2
Analyzing the Benefits and Costs of the Safe Step Act on Patients, Physicians, and Insurers.分析《安全步骤法案》对患者、医生和保险公司的收益与成本。
J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2024 Jul;9(3):115-120. doi: 10.1177/24755303241253203. Epub 2024 May 7.
3
Macular Degeneration Drug Prescribing Patterns After Step Therapy Introduction in Medicare Advantage.
医疗保险优势计划引入阶梯式疗法后黄斑变性药物的处方模式。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Aug 2;5(8):e242446. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2446.
4
Commercial coverage of specialty drugs, 2017-2021.2017 - 2021年专科药物的商业保险覆盖情况
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Aug 4;1(2):qxad030. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad030. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Step Therapy's Balancing Act - Protecting Patients while Addressing High Drug Prices.阶梯治疗的平衡之举——在应对高昂药价的同时保护患者。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 10;386(10):901-904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2117582. Epub 2022 Mar 5.