Suppr超能文献

使用远程实践进行基于证据的阅读和拼写教学程序的综合:在 COVID-19 背景下的快速综述。

An evidence-based synthesis of instructional reading and spelling procedures using telepractice: A rapid review in the context of COVID-19.

机构信息

School of Education, College of Arts, Social Sciences and Commerce, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):456-472. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12619. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to COVID-19, many educators and allied health practitioners are facing the challenge of rapidly transitioning to telepractice delivery of instructional reading and spelling procedures without being fully informed of the evidence.

AIMS

A rapid review was conducted to provide educators, allied health practitioners and policymakers with a synthesis of valid, relevant and actionable evidence relating to telepractice delivery of instructional reading and spelling procedures. The aim was to investigate the nature and outcomes of studies examining instructional reading and spelling procedures delivered via telepractice to school-aged students.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: A rapid review was undertaken in accordance with the eight-step process published by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Medline (all databases), Embase, Cochrane and ProQuest Central were systematically searched with predefined search terms organized across four key concepts relating to the research questions.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Nine studies were included in this rapid review. Reading and spelling instruction and intervention using telepractice can be feasible and engaging. Telepractice assessment for reading and spelling can be equally effective as onsite assessment.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The evidence base for telepractice delivery of reading and spelling procedures is in its infancy in terms of both the quantity and the quality of the evidence. Insufficient evidence exists to draw clear conclusions about its efficacy, and therefore practitioners should proceed cautiously. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject For onsite delivery, evidence-based reading and spelling assessment, instruction and interventions delivered by educators and allied health practitioners have been shown to accelerate students' skills; less is known about the efficacy of instructional reading and spelling procedures in a telepractice model, which have rapidly become the new norm in many countries due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The benefits of telepractice include improved access to services, increased service availability, convenience, time efficiency, caseload management efficiency and removal of logistical barriers relating to cost and geographical location. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telepractice has facilitated continued access to services. What this study adds to existing knowledge Reading and spelling instruction and intervention delivered via telepractice can be feasible and engaging. Telepractice is a viable mode to deliver reading and spelling assessments with strong agreement between telepractice and onsite scores. Given their low methodological quality, the studies in this review provide valuable information around the how of telepractice reading and spelling procedures and highlight the factors that may contribute to positive outcomes with this service delivery model. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Educators and allied health practitioners need a thorough understanding of the student's telepractice environment and require adequate training and support to engage in telepractice service delivery. Educators and allied health practitioners should consider students for telepractice on a case-by-case basis. Practitioners should proceed cautiously with telepractice reading and spelling assessment, intervention and instruction, with the knowledge that the current available evidence is of limited quality.

摘要

背景

由于 COVID-19 的影响,许多教育工作者和相关健康从业者正面临着迅速将教学阅读和拼写程序转变为远程实践教学的挑战,而他们对相关证据了解甚少。

目的

本次快速审查旨在为教育工作者、相关健康从业者和政策制定者提供与通过远程实践进行教学阅读和拼写程序相关的有效、相关且可行的证据综合。本研究旨在调查通过远程实践向学龄儿童提供教学阅读和拼写程序的研究的性质和结果。

方法与程序

按照 Cochrane 快速审查方法组发布的八步流程进行了快速审查。通过预设的搜索词,系统地在 Medline(所有数据库)、Embase、Cochrane 和 ProQuest Central 中进行了搜索,这些搜索词组织在与研究问题相关的四个关键概念中。

结果

本次快速审查共纳入了 9 项研究。使用远程实践进行阅读和拼写教学和干预是可行且吸引人的。远程实践评估阅读和拼写的效果与现场评估相当。

结论和意义

就证据的数量和质量而言,阅读和拼写程序远程实践的证据基础还处于起步阶段。目前还没有足够的证据来得出关于其疗效的明确结论,因此从业者应谨慎行事。

本文的新增内容

关于该主题目前已有的知识

  • 对于现场教学,教育工作者和相关健康从业者提供的基于证据的阅读和拼写评估、教学和干预已被证明可以加速学生的技能发展;

  • 关于远程实践模式中教学阅读和拼写程序的效果,人们知之甚少,由于 COVID-19 大流行,这种远程实践模式已在许多国家迅速成为新的常态。远程实践的好处包括提高服务的可及性、增加服务的可用性、便利性、时间效率、病例管理效率以及消除与成本和地理位置相关的后勤障碍。

  • 在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程实践为服务的持续提供提供了便利。

本研究在现有知识方面的新增内容

  • 通过远程实践进行阅读和拼写教学和干预是可行且吸引人的。

  • 远程实践是一种可行的模式,可以进行阅读和拼写评估,并且远程实践得分与现场评估得分之间具有高度一致性。

本研究的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?

教育工作者和相关健康从业者需要充分了解学生的远程实践环境,并需要接受充分的培训和支持才能参与远程实践服务。教育工作者和相关健康从业者应根据具体情况考虑让学生接受远程实践。从业者在进行远程阅读和拼写评估、干预和教学时应谨慎行事,因为目前可用的证据质量有限。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers.针对说英语的阅读障碍者的自然拼读法训练。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD009115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验