Suppr超能文献

这张图有什么问题?对当前医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心连续血糖监测覆盖标准的批判性评价。

What's Wrong with This Picture? A Critical Review of Current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Criteria for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Center for Diabetes Metabolism Research Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Sep;23(9):652-660. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0107. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the clinical value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes populations. However, the eligibility criteria for CGM coverage required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) ignore conclusive evidence that supports CGM use in various diabetes populations that are currently deemed ineligible. This article discusses the limitations and inconsistencies of the CMS eligibility criteria relative to current scientific evidence and proposes workable solutions to address this issue and improve the safety and care of all individuals with diabetes.

摘要

大量研究表明,连续血糖监测(CGM)在 1 型糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病患者群体中具有临床价值。然而,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)规定的 CGM 覆盖资格标准忽略了支持 CGM 在目前被认为不合格的各种糖尿病患者群体中使用的确凿证据。本文讨论了 CMS 资格标准相对于当前科学证据的局限性和不一致性,并提出了可行的解决方案,以解决这一问题,提高所有糖尿病患者的安全性和护理水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f472/8501458/01e259c43ee2/dia.2021.0107_figure1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验