Puckrein Gary A, Hirsch Irl B, Parkin Christopher G, Taylor Bruce T, Norman Gregory J, Xu Liou, Marrero David G
National Minority Quality Forum, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Jan;25(1):31-38. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0377. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
We investigated the potential associations between race/ethnicity and adherence to prescribed glucose monitoring in a sample of Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes and how adherence to the method used impacted diabetes-related inpatient hospitalizations and associated costs among beneficiaries with intensive insulin-treated diabetes. This 12-month retrospective analysis utilized Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data to identify Medicare beneficiaries who used intensive insulin therapy from January through December 2018 and classified them into four groups: (1) persons using real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM), (2) persons using any method of blood glucose monitoring (BGM) who followed prescribed use patterns (adherent), (3) persons who were prescribed BGM but were nonadherent in its use, and (4) no record of any form of BGM. Analyses compared these groups and the role that comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), and race/ethnicity played on group assignment, diabetes-related inpatient hospitalizations, and costs. Among the 1,329,061 persons assessed, 38.14% had no record of glucose monitoring and 35.42% were BGM nonadherent. Similarly, among the 629,514 beneficiaries with a CCI risk score of ≥2, 466,646 (74.13%) were either nonadherent to BGM or had no monitoring record. The percentage of White (3.65%) rtCGM adherent beneficiaries was significantly larger than Black (1.58%) and Hispanic (1.28%) beneficiaries, both < 0.0001. Hospitalizations and costs were higher for Black and Hispanic beneficiaries versus Whites within the risk score ≥ 2 group regardless of glucose monitoring method. Race is associated with increased hospitalizations and costs associated with diabetes care and absence of any form of BGM was associated with higher rates of comorbidities. Persons of color were less likely to use rtCGM despite Medicare coverage. New initiatives that promote diabetes self-management education and support services are needed to improve utilization of glucose monitoring within the Medicare diabetes population.
我们调查了医疗保险受益糖尿病患者样本中种族/族裔与遵守规定的血糖监测之间的潜在关联,以及遵守所使用的方法如何影响强化胰岛素治疗的糖尿病受益人的糖尿病相关住院治疗及相关费用。这项为期12个月的回顾性分析利用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的数据,确定了2018年1月至12月使用强化胰岛素治疗的医疗保险受益人,并将他们分为四组:(1)使用实时连续血糖监测(rtCGM)的人;(2)使用任何血糖监测(BGM)方法且遵循规定使用模式(依从)的人;(3)被开了BGM但使用不依从的人;(4)没有任何形式BGM记录的人。分析比较了这些组以及合并症(查尔森合并症指数[CCI])和种族/族裔在组分配、糖尿病相关住院治疗和费用方面所起的作用。在评估的1329061人中,38.14%没有血糖监测记录,35.42%的人BGM不依从。同样,在CCI风险评分≥2的629514名受益人中,466646人(74.13%)要么BGM不依从,要么没有监测记录。白人rtCGM依从受益人(3.65%)的比例显著高于黑人(1.58%)和西班牙裔(1.28%)受益人,两者均<0.0001。在风险评分≥2的组中,无论血糖监测方法如何,黑人和西班牙裔受益人的住院治疗和费用均高于白人。种族与糖尿病护理相关的住院治疗和费用增加有关,而没有任何形式的BGM与更高的合并症发生率有关。尽管有医疗保险覆盖,但有色人种使用rtCGM的可能性较小。需要新的举措来促进糖尿病自我管理教育和支持服务,以提高医疗保险糖尿病患者群体对血糖监测的利用率。