• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析有关隆鼻术的在线患者教育资料。

Analysis of Online Patient Education Materials on Rhinoplasty.

机构信息

University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;24(4):276-281. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0001. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2021.0001
PMID:33844930
Abstract

Are education materials available online appropriate for patients seeking information before rhinoplasty? Google.com and YouTube.com were searched for patient education information on rhinoplasty procedures. Of the first 100 results, 75 articles and 75 videos met the inclusion criteria. Each article's readability was scored using six previously validated readability scores to determine patient's ability to comprehend the text, while each video was scored using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria and the Global Quality Score (GQS) to measure source reliability and educational value, respectively. Analysis of the readability of the 75 articles yielded an average grade reading level of 10.31 (range 5-20; 95% confidence interval, 9.83-10.79), while video analysis found videos authored by physicians were significantly more reliable ( < 0.001) and had a significantly higher educational value ( < 0.001). Patient education videos were found to be more reliable than patient experience videos ( = 0.01). The average reading level for text information on rhinoplasty is higher than the recommended 5th-grade reading level and educational videos authored by physicians are more reliable and contain higher educational value yet lack important information.

摘要

在线提供的教育材料是否适合寻求鼻整形术前信息的患者?在 Google.com 和 YouTube.com 上搜索了有关鼻整形手术的患者教育信息。在前 100 个结果中,有 75 篇文章和 75 个视频符合纳入标准。使用六个先前验证的可读性评分来评估每个文章的可读性,以确定患者理解文本的能力,而每个视频则使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)来衡量来源可靠性和教育价值。对 75 篇文章的可读性进行分析得出的平均阅读水平为 10.31(范围为 5-20;95%置信区间为 9.83-10.79),而视频分析发现医生撰写的视频明显更可靠(<0.001),并且具有更高的教育价值(<0.001)。研究发现,患者教育视频比患者体验视频更可靠(=0.01)。鼻整形术文本信息的平均阅读水平高于推荐的 5 年级阅读水平,而由医生撰写的教育视频更可靠,并且包含更高的教育价值,但缺乏重要信息。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Online Patient Education Materials on Rhinoplasty.分析有关隆鼻术的在线患者教育资料。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;24(4):276-281. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0001. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Quality and Reliability of YouTube for Patient Information on Neurotoxins.YouTube上关于神经毒素的患者信息的质量与可靠性。
Facial Plast Surg. 2020 Dec;36(6):773-777. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1719100. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
3
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
4
Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery.评估有关眼睑下垂手术的 YouTube 视频的教育质量和可靠性。
Orbit. 2022 Oct;41(5):598-604. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
6
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
7
Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.评估 YouTube 视频作为玻璃体腔内注射手术患者信息来源的价值。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022 Sep;45(7):748-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
8
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上的上眼睑双眼皮成形术视频的可靠性和质量。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):754-759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02504-z. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
9
Quality and reliability evaluation of online videos on carpal tunnel syndrome: a YouTube video-based study.基于YouTube视频的腕管综合征在线视频质量与可靠性评估研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e059239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059239.
10
Otoplasty Online Information: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Websites and Videos that Patients View Regarding Cosmetic Ear Surgery.耳整形术在线信息:对患者浏览的有关耳部整形手术的网站和视频的综合分析。
Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615280. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability of Hospital Online Patient Education Materials Across Otolaryngology Specialties.跨耳鼻喉科专业的医院在线患者教育材料的可读性
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Feb 14;10(1):e70101. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70101. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
A Comprehensive Analysis on the Readability of Rhinoplasty-Based Web Content for Patients.基于隆鼻手术的患者网络内容可读性综合分析
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Feb;33(1):107-115. doi: 10.1177/22925503231195018. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
ChatGPT vs. web search for patient questions: what does ChatGPT do better?
ChatGPT 与网页搜索在解答患者问题上的对比:ChatGPT 有哪些优势?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;281(6):3219-3225. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08524-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Validation of ChatGPT 3.5 as a Tool to Optimize Readability of Patient-facing Craniofacial Education Materials.验证ChatGPT 3.5作为优化面向患者的颅面教育材料可读性工具的有效性。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Feb 2;12(2):e5575. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005575. eCollection 2024 Feb.