• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估有关眼睑下垂手术的 YouTube 视频的教育质量和可靠性。

Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery.

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.

出版信息

Orbit. 2022 Oct;41(5):598-604. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467
PMID:34713759
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the educational content, quality, and reliability of YouTube videos addressing anterior approach ptosis surgery.

METHODS

A search on YouTube using the term "ptosis surgery" was performed between March 20 and March 26 2021. The quality, reliability, and accuracy of the contents of 38 videos meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated by two independent ophthalmologists using the DISCERN questionnaire and the (JAMA) benchmark criteria. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and a surgical scoring system were used to assess the educational value of the content.

RESULTS

The mean DISCERN score was 32.8 ± 10, and the mean JAMA score was 1.3 ± 0.5, indicating poor quality; the mean global quality score was 3.1 ± 1.1, indicating moderate quality; and the mean surgical score was 7.5 ± 2.7, indicating moderate to good quality. The surgical, DISCERN, and GQS scores of the videos uploaded by physicians were significantly higher than those of the videos uploaded by private clinics ( = .015, = .049, and = .01, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between the surgical, DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores (< .001). A significant positive correlation was found between video duration and surgical score (= .013), DISCERN score ( ˂0.001), and GQS score ( ˂0.001).

CONCLUSION

Videos with known sources, uploaded by physicians, and supported by audio narration may be useful in obtaining educational information. However, the available videos are not a reliable source of educational information about ptosis surgery.

摘要

目的

评估涉及前入路上睑下垂手术的 YouTube 视频的教育内容、质量和可靠性。

方法

2021 年 3 月 20 日至 3 月 26 日,在 YouTube 上使用“上睑下垂手术”一词进行搜索。两名独立的眼科医生使用 DISCERN 问卷和(JAMA)基准标准评估符合纳入标准的 38 个视频的内容质量、可靠性和准确性。使用全球质量评分(GQS)和手术评分系统评估内容的教育价值。

结果

DISCERN 平均得分为 32.8 ± 10,JAMA 平均得分为 1.3 ± 0.5,表明质量较差;平均全球质量评分为 3.1 ± 1.1,表明中等质量;平均手术评分为 7.5 ± 2.7,表明中等至良好质量。医生上传的视频的手术、DISCERN 和 GQS 评分明显高于私人诊所上传的视频(=0.015,=0.049,=0.01,分别)。手术、DISCERN、JAMA 和 GQS 评分之间存在显著正相关(<0.001)。视频时长与手术评分(=0.013)、DISCERN 评分(<0.001)和 GQS 评分(<0.001)呈显著正相关。

结论

来源已知、由医生上传并附有音频旁白的视频可能有助于获取教育信息。但是,现有的视频并不是有关上睑下垂手术教育信息的可靠来源。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery.评估有关眼睑下垂手术的 YouTube 视频的教育质量和可靠性。
Orbit. 2022 Oct;41(5):598-604. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1989467. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
2
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上的上眼睑双眼皮成形术视频的可靠性和质量。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):754-759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02504-z. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Assessment of the quality of information on treatment of keratoconus on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上关于圆锥角膜治疗信息的质量。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 May;42(5):1499-1505. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-02139-8. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
5
Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the lid loading videos on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上盖子加载视频的可靠性、实用性和质量。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun;43(6):2065-2072. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02606-w. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
6
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
7
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
8
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.YouTube 上睾丸癌视频的质量分析。
Andrologia. 2021 Sep;53(8):e14118. doi: 10.1111/and.14118. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
Reliability of YouTube Videos in Vitreoretinal Surgery.YouTube 视频在玻璃体视网膜手术中的可靠性。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021 Sep;52(9):478-483. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20210817-01. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the quality and reliability of using YouTube as a patient information source for gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculectomy: A cross-sectional study.评估将YouTube用作房角镜辅助小梁切除术患者信息来源的质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e44132. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044132.
2
Pitfalls of social media for aesthetic eye surgery patients: assessing YouTube's aesthetic canthoplasty content.社交媒体在眼部美容手术患者中的陷阱:评估 YouTube 上的美学重睑术内容。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 25;44(1):279. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03197-4.
3
Dacryocystorhinostomy videos on YouTube as a source of patient education.
YouTube 上的泪囊鼻腔造口术视频作为患者教育的一个来源。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 23;44(1):192. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03139-0.
4
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos on Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.YouTube上关于先天性鼻泪管阻塞视频的可靠性和质量评估
Cureus. 2023 Mar 19;15(3):e36365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36365. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the lid loading videos on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上盖子加载视频的可靠性、实用性和质量。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun;43(6):2065-2072. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02606-w. Epub 2022 Dec 9.