Suppr超能文献

急性后极部多发性斑状色素上皮病变的分类标准。

Classification Criteria for Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine classification criteria for acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE).

DESIGN

Machine learning of cases with APMPPE and 8 other posterior uveitides.

METHODS

Cases of posterior uveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the posterior uveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set.

RESULTS

One thousand sixty-eight cases of posterior uveitides, including 82 cases of APMPPE, were evaluated by machine learning. Key criteria for APMPPE included (1) choroidal lesions with a plaque-like or placoid appearance and (2) characteristic imaging on fluorescein angiography (lesions "block early and stain late diffusely"). Overall accuracy for posterior uveitides was 92.7% in the training set and 98.0% (95% confidence interval 94.3, 99.3) in the validation set. The misclassification rates for APMPPE were 5% in the training set and 0% in the validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria for APMPPE had a low misclassification rate and seemed to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.

摘要

目的

确定急性后极部多灶性斑状色素上皮病变(APMPPE)的分类标准。

设计

APMPPE 和其他 8 种后葡萄膜炎病例的机器学习。

方法

在后葡萄膜炎的信息学设计的初步数据库中收集病例,并使用正式共识技术对达成诊断多数共识的病例构建最终数据库。病例分为训练集和验证集。使用多项逻辑回归的机器学习在训练集上确定一组简洁的标准,这些标准最小化了后葡萄膜炎之间的分类错误率。在验证集上评估得出的标准。

结果

通过机器学习评估了 1068 例后葡萄膜炎病例,包括 82 例 APMPPE。APMPPE 的关键标准包括(1)脉络膜病变呈斑块样或斑片状外观,(2)荧光素血管造影的特征性成像(病变“早期阻塞,晚期弥漫性染色”)。训练集的总体准确率为 92.7%,验证集为 98.0%(95%置信区间 94.3,99.3)。训练集的误诊率为 5%,验证集为 0%。

结论

APMPPE 的标准误诊率较低,似乎足以用于临床和转化研究。

相似文献

1
Classification Criteria for Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
Classification Criteria For Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.050. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Classification Criteria for Serpiginous Choroiditis.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.038. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Classification Criteria for Birdshot Chorioretinitis.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.059. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
5
Classification Criteria for Punctate Inner Choroiditis.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.046. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Classification Criteria for Acute Retinal Necrosis Syndrome.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.057. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Classification Criteria for Multifocal Choroiditis With Panuveitis.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.043. Epub 2021 May 11.
8
Development of Classification Criteria for the Uveitides.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.061. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
9
Classification Criteria for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Classification Criteria for Fuchs Uveitis Syndrome.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:262-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.052. Epub 2021 May 11.

引用本文的文献

2
3
Artificial Intelligence in Uveitis: Innovations in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 14;18:3753-3766. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S495307. eCollection 2024.
4
5
The standardisation of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) project.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 27. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14175.
6
Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy associated with serous retinal detachment: A case report.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 8;77:103600. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103600. eCollection 2022 May.
7
[Development of classification criteria for uveitis by the standardization of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) working group].
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Sep;118(9):913-918. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01486-2. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
8
Development of Classification Criteria for the Uveitides.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.061. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Reply to Comment on: Classification Criteria for Behçet Disease Uveitis.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;235:339-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
OCT Angiography in Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 Jul 1;50(7):428-436. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20190703-04.
3
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Reveals Choriocapillaris Flow Reduction in Placoid Chorioretinitis.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2017 Jan-Feb;1(1):77-91. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Untreated Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy (APMPPE): a case series.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0744-z.
5
Interobserver Agreement Among Uveitis Experts on Uveitic Diagnoses: The Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Experience.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;186:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Neurological Manifestations of Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy.
J Clin Neurol. 2016 Oct;12(4):460-467. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2016.12.4.460.
8
Choroidal Involvement in Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016 Jan;47(1):20-6. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20151214-03.
9
Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria?
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Jul;67(7):891-7. doi: 10.1002/acr.22583.
10
The role of fundus autofluorescence imaging in the study of the course of posterior uveitis disorders.
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:247469. doi: 10.1155/2015/247469. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验