• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disparities and interventions in the timeliness of endometrial cancer diagnosis and treatment in the United States: a scoping review protocol.美国子宫内膜癌诊断和治疗及时性的差异及干预措施:范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 13;10(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01649-x.
2
Disparities in Timeliness of Endometrial Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.子宫内膜癌治疗及时性的差异:范围综述。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct 1;142(4):967-977. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005338. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Access to and experience of education for children and adolescents with cancer: a scoping review protocol.儿童和青少年癌症患者的教育机会和体验:系统评价研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 7;10(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01723-4.
6
Patient journey and timeliness of care for patients with breast cancer in Africa: a scoping review protocol.非洲乳腺癌患者的就医流程和及时护理:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e081256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081256.
7
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
8
Structural stigma and its impact on healthcare for consumers with borderline personality disorder: protocol for a scoping review.结构污名及其对边缘型人格障碍患者医疗保健的影响:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 11;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01580-1.
9
Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review.社会科学研究对抗微生物药物耐药性的贡献:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 5;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-1279-y.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Timeliness of Endometrial Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.子宫内膜癌治疗及时性的差异:范围综述。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct 1;142(4):967-977. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005338. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
2
Factors Associated With Survival Disparities Between Non-Hispanic Black and White Patients With Uterine Cancer.与非裔美国人和白人女性子宫癌患者生存差异相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238437. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8437.
3
What causes delays in diagnosing blood cancers? A rapid review of the evidence.导致血液癌诊断延误的原因是什么?证据的快速综述。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Apr 11;24:e26. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000129.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of waiting intervals on survival outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review of the literature.等待间隔对子宫内膜癌患者生存结局的影响:文献系统评价
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Mar;246:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Seeking Black Women's Voices in Endometrial Cancer Research via Deliberate Community Engagement.通过有意识的社区参与在子宫内膜癌研究中探寻黑人女性的声音。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(3):253-264. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0053.
3
The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework.国家少数民族健康与健康差异研究所研究框架。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S16-S20. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304883.
4
Role of bleeding recognition and evaluation in Black-White disparities in endometrial cancer.出血识别和评估在子宫内膜癌的黑-白差异中的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):593.e1-593.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.040. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
5
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Endometrial cancer disparities: a race-conscious critique of the literature.子宫内膜癌的差异:对文献的种族意识批判。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):474-482.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
8
Untangling the Black-White mortality gap in endometrial cancer: a cohort simulation.剖析子宫内膜癌中黑人和白人的死亡率差距:一项队列模拟研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):324-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.023. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
9
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
10
Disparities in treatment and survival for women with endometrial cancer: A contemporary national cancer database registry analysis.子宫内膜癌女性患者治疗与生存的差异:一项当代国家癌症数据库登记分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Oct;143(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.107. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

美国子宫内膜癌诊断和治疗及时性的差异及干预措施:范围综述方案

Disparities and interventions in the timeliness of endometrial cancer diagnosis and treatment in the United States: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 13;10(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01649-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01649-x
PMID:33845907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8042979/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparities in the stage at diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC) account for a significant proportion of the disparities in morbidity and mortality experienced by vulnerable groups in the USA. Evidence suggests that disparities in timeliness of care and treatment play a significant role in stage at diagnosis. Despite an increase in literature on EC disparities, the issue remains largely unchanged. The objectives of this review will be to synthesize the evidence to identify important remaining research questions and inform future interventions to reduce the disparity in stage at diagnosis of EC in the USA.

METHODS

This scoping review protocol will use the five-step framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley. A literature search will be conducted from January 2000 onwards in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Studies on delays in care of EC will be included if they were published in English and reported findings for the US population. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. The study methodological quality and bias will be appraised using appropriate tools. A narrative summary of findings will be conducted. Data analysis will involve quantitative (e.g., frequencies) and qualitative (e.g., content and thematic analysis) methods. The literature search, data extraction, and evidence synthesis will be informed by the Pathway to Treatment Model, which divides time to cancer care initiation into appraisal, help-seeking, diagnostic, and pre-treatment intervals. Results will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement.

DISCUSSION

EC disparities research is currently benefitting form a growing expectation that studies have a real impact on disparities. Patient, healthcare, and disease factors impact the amount of time patients spend in different intervals of the Pathway to Treatment Model, so research and interventions aimed at reducing disparities in EC survival should be designed with cognizance to how these factors impact their target population. Reviews on disparities in stage at diagnosis of EC exist but do not provide a comprehensive picture of the pathway to treatment. This review will seek to provide an expanded bedrock of evidence for future studies to build on as they aim to more actively reduce EC disparities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework ( osf.io/v2zxy ).

摘要

背景

在美国,弱势群体在子宫内膜癌(EC)诊断时的分期差异导致发病率和死亡率存在显著差异,这一差异占很大比例。有证据表明,护理和治疗及时性方面的差异在诊断时的分期中起着重要作用。尽管关于 EC 差异的文献有所增加,但这一问题仍然基本没有改变。本综述的目的是综合证据,确定重要的遗留研究问题,并为未来减少美国 EC 诊断分期差异的干预措施提供信息。

方法

本范围综述将使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 开发的五步框架。将从 2000 年 1 月开始在 PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 数据库中进行文献检索。如果研究发表于英文且报告了美国人群的发现,则将包括 EC 护理延迟的研究。两名评审员将独立筛选所有引文、全文文章和摘要数据。将使用适当的工具评估研究方法学质量和偏倚。将进行发现的叙述性总结。数据分析将涉及定量(例如,频率)和定性(例如,内容和主题分析)方法。文献检索、数据提取和证据综合将遵循治疗途径模型,该模型将癌症护理开始时间分为评估、寻求帮助、诊断和治疗前间隔。结果将按照 PRISMA 声明报告。

讨论

EC 差异研究目前受益于一种日益增长的期望,即研究对差异有真正的影响。患者、医疗保健和疾病因素影响患者在治疗途径模型的不同间隔中花费的时间,因此旨在减少 EC 生存差异的研究和干预措施应在设计时考虑到这些因素如何影响其目标人群。关于 EC 诊断分期差异的综述已经存在,但没有提供治疗途径的全面情况。本综述将试图为未来的研究提供更广泛的证据基础,以便他们在努力更积极地减少 EC 差异时可以在此基础上进行研究。

试验注册

开放科学框架(osf.io/v2zxy)。