• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Studies Funded Under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act.《最佳儿童药物法案》资助研究中的种族和民族多样性。
Pediatrics. 2021 May;147(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-042903. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Racial and Ethnic Representation in Food Allergen Immunotherapy Trial Participants: A Systematic Review.食物过敏原免疫疗法试验参与者中的种族和族裔代表性:一项系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32710.
3
Review of Racial and Ethnic Representation of Participants Enrolled in Pediatric Clinical Trials of Oncology Drugs Conducted Through FDA Written Requests.通过 FDA 书面请求开展的肿瘤药物儿科临床试验中入组参与者的种族和民族代表性回顾。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Mar 1;10(3):380-383. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5781.
4
Demographic diversity of US-based participants in GSK-sponsored interventional clinical trials.美国参与葛兰素史克赞助的介入性临床试验的参与者的人口统计学多样性。
Clin Trials. 2023 Apr;20(2):133-144. doi: 10.1177/17407745221149118. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
5
Diversity and Representation Among United States Participants in Amgen Clinical Trials.美国安进临床试验参与者的多样性和代表性。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct;11(5):3112-3127. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01768-2. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
6
Reporting and Representation of Participant Race and Ethnicity in National Institutes of Health-Funded Pediatric Clinical Trials.报告和代表参与者的种族和民族在国立卫生研究院资助的儿科临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31316.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.种族和民族在原发性开角型青光眼临床试验中的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348.
8
NIH Portfolio of Unintentional Injury Research Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Children: Current Landscape and Future Opportunities.美国国立卫生研究院少数民族儿童意外伤害研究组合:现状与未来机遇。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Jun;8(3):596-606. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00818-3. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Racial/Ethnic and Sex Representation in US-Based Clinical Trials of Hearing Loss Management in Adults: A Systematic Review.美国成人听力损失管理临床试验中的种族/族裔及性别代表性:一项系统综述
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jul 1;147(7):656-662. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.0550.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Participants in Precision Oncology Clinical Studies.精准肿瘤学临床研究中参与者的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133205. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33205.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Approach for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Research Participation.儿科重症监护病房研究参与的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411375. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11375.
2
Barriers and facilitators to recruitment of underrepresented research participants: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators.招募代表性不足的研究参与者的障碍与促进因素:临床研究协调员的观点
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug 18;7(1):e193. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.611. eCollection 2023.
3
Reporting and Representation of Participant Race and Ethnicity in National Institutes of Health-Funded Pediatric Clinical Trials.报告和代表参与者的种族和民族在国立卫生研究院资助的儿科临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2331316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31316.
4
Pediatric Clinical Research Networks: Role in Accelerating Development of Therapeutics in Children.儿科临床研究网络:在加速儿童治疗药物开发中的作用。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Nov;56(6):934-947. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00453-6. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
A call to action: Issuing a diversity and inclusion challenge to research organizations.行动呼吁:向研究组织发出多样性和包容性挑战。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Nov;14(6):2095-2098. doi: 10.1111/cts.13105. Epub 2021 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Missing diversity in brain tumor trials.脑肿瘤试验中缺乏多样性。
Neurooncol Adv. 2020 May 13;2(1):vdaa059. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa059. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence.随机对照试验参与的研究负担:定性证据的系统主题综合分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Jan 20;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1476-5.
3
Diversity in Medical Device Clinical Trials: Do We Know What Works for Which Patients?医疗器械临床试验中的多样性:我们知道哪种方法对哪些患者有效吗?
Milbank Q. 2018 Sep;96(3):499-529. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12344.
4
The Hawaii clopidogrel lawsuit: the possible effect on clinical laboratory testing.夏威夷氯吡格雷诉讼案:对临床实验室检测可能产生的影响。
Per Med. 2015 Jun;12(3):179-181. doi: 10.2217/pme.15.4.
5
Characteristics and Changes of Pediatric Therapeutic Trials under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act.《儿童最佳药物法案》下儿科治疗试验的特点与变化
J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;192:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.048. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials.NIH 复兴法案颁布 20 年后:增强少数族裔参与临床试验(EMPaCT):为改善少数族裔临床试验入组奠定基础:重申增强少数族裔参与癌症临床试验的必要性。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1091-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28575.
7
Health care access and utilization among US-born and foreign-born Asian Americans.美国出生和外国出生的亚裔美国人的医疗保健可及性和利用情况。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Oct;14(5):731-7. doi: 10.1007/s10903-011-9543-9.
8
Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research.挑战关于少数族裔参与美国临床研究的假设。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2217-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300279. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
Estimating the economic burden of racial health inequalities in the United States.估算美国种族健康不平等造成的经济负担。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(2):231-8. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.2.c.
10
Health status and health services access and utilization among Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, South Asian, and Vietnamese children in California.加利福尼亚州的华裔、菲律宾裔、日裔、韩裔、南亚裔和越南裔儿童的健康状况以及获得和利用卫生服务的情况。
Am J Public Health. 2010 May;100(5):823-30. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.168948. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

《最佳儿童药物法案》资助研究中的种族和民族多样性。

Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Studies Funded Under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act.

机构信息

Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri;

Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2021 May;147(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-042903. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2020-042903
PMID:33846237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9713833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) incentivizes the study of on-patent medicines in children and mandates that the National Institutes of Health sponsor research on off-patent drugs important to pediatric therapeutics. Failing to enroll cohorts that reflect the pediatric population at large restricts the generalizability of such studies. In this investigation, we evaluate racial and ethnic minority representation among participants enrolled in BPCA-sponsored studies.

METHODS

Data were obtained for all participants enrolled in 33 federally funded studies of drugs and devices conducted from 2008 through June 2020. Observed racial and ethnic distributions were compared with expected distributions by sampling Census data at the same geographic frequency as in the studies. Racial and ethnic enrollment was examined by demography, geography, study type, study burden, and expected bias. Standard descriptive statistics, χ, generalized linear models, and linear regression were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 10 918 participants (51% male, 6.6 ± 8.2 years) were enrolled across 46 US states and 4 countries. Studies ranged from treatment outcome reviews to randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Minority enrollment was comparable to, or higher than, expected (+0.1% to +2.6%) for all groups except Asian Americans (-3.7%, < .001). American Indian and Alaskan Native and multiracial enrollment significantly increased over the evaluation period ( < .01). There were no significant differences in racial distribution as a function of age or sex, although differences were observed on the basis of geography, study type, and study burden.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study revealed no evidence of racial and ethnic bias in enrollment for pediatric studies conducted with funding from BPCA, fulfilling the legislation's expectation to ensure adequate representation of all children.

摘要

背景与目的

《最佳儿童用药法案》(BPCA)鼓励对专利药品进行儿童研究,并要求美国国立卫生研究院赞助对儿科治疗学重要的非专利药物研究。未能招募反映总体儿科人群的队列限制了此类研究的普遍性。在这项研究中,我们评估了在 BPCA 赞助的研究中入组的参与者中的种族和少数民族代表性。

方法

从 2008 年到 2020 年 6 月,我们获取了所有参加 33 项联邦资助的药物和器械研究的参与者的数据。通过在与研究相同的地理频率上抽样人口普查数据,将观察到的种族和族裔分布与预期分布进行比较。根据人口统计学、地理位置、研究类型、研究负担和预期偏差来检查种族和族裔的入组情况。应用了标准描述性统计、χ²检验、广义线性模型和线性回归。

结果

共有 10918 名参与者(51%为男性,6.6±8.2 岁)来自美国 46 个州和 4 个国家。研究范围从治疗结果审查到随机、安慰剂对照试验。除了亚裔美国人(-3.7%,<0.001)外,所有组别的少数民族入组率均与预期相符或高于预期(+0.1%至+2.6%)。美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民以及多种族入组率在评估期间显著增加(<0.01)。种族分布与年龄或性别无显著差异,但在地理位置、研究类型和研究负担方面存在差异。

结论和相关性

这项研究没有发现 BPCA 资助的儿科研究在入组方面存在种族和民族偏见的证据,这符合该立法确保所有儿童都有足够代表性的期望。