New York Ophthalmology Associates, Manhattan.
School of Health Sciences and Practice & Institute of Public Health, New York Medical College, Valhalla.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348.
The disease burden for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is highest among racial/ethnic minority groups, particularly Black individuals. The prevalence of POAG worldwide is projected to increase from 52.7 million in 2020 to 79.8 million in 2040, a 51.4% increase attributed mainly to Asian and African individuals. Given this increase, key stakeholders need to pay particular attention to creating a diverse study population in POAG clinical trials.
To assess the prevalence of racial/ethnic minorities in POAG clinical research trials compared with White individuals.
This meta-analysis consisted of publicly available POAG clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Drugs@FDA from 1994 to 2019.
Randomized clinical trials that reported on interventions for POAG and included demographic subgroups including sex and race/ethnicity.
Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 2 independent reviewers extracted study-level data for a random-effects meta-analysis. A third person served as the tiebreaker on study selection. Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation) and SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute) were used for data collection and analyses.
The primary outcomes were the prevalence of each demographic subgroup (White, Black, Hispanic/Latino, other race/ethnicity groups, and female or male) in each trial according to the trial start year, study region, and study sponsor. Participation rates are expressed as percentages.
A total of 105 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis, including 33 428 POAG clinical trial participants (18 404 women [55.1%]). Overall, 70.7% were White patients, 16.8% were Black patients, 3.4% were Hispanic/Latino patients, and 9.1% were individuals of other races/ethnicities, including Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, and unreported as defined by the US Census. The mean (SD) numbers of participants by race/ethnicity were 236.5 (208.2) for White, 58.4 (70.0) for Black, 29.9 (71.1) for Hispanic/Latino, and 31.1 (94.3) for other race/ethnicity. According to the test for heterogeneity using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, the I2 statistic was 98%, indicating high heterogeneity of outcomes in the included trials. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess any trend and significance between participation by Black individuals and the year the study started, the region in which the study took place, and the study sponsor. There was no significant increase of Black participant enrollment from 1994 to 2019 (r2 = 0.11; P = .17) and no significant association between Black participant enrollment and clinical trial region (r2 = 0.16; P = .50), but there was a significant association between Black participant enrollment and study sponsor (r2 = 0.94; P = .03).
This meta-analysis found that compared with White individuals, individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups had a very low participation rate in POAG clinical trials despite having a higher prevalence among the disease population. Despite measures to increase clinical trial diversity, there has not been a significant increase in clinical trial participation among Black individuals, the group most affected by this disease; this disparity in POAG clinical trial representation can raise questions about the true safety and efficacy of approved medical interventions for this disease and should prompt further research on how to increase POAG clinical trial diversity.
原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)的疾病负担在种族/族裔少数群体中最高,尤其是黑人。预计全球 POAG 的患病率将从 2020 年的 5270 万增加到 2040 年的 7980 万,增幅为 51.4%,主要归因于亚洲和非洲个体。鉴于这种增长,主要利益相关者需要特别关注在 POAG 临床试验中创建多样化的研究人群。
评估与白人相比,POAG 临床研究试验中少数民族的患病率。
本荟萃分析包括使用 ClinicalTrials.gov、PubMed 和 Drugs@FDA 从 1994 年至 2019 年期间的公开 POAG 临床研究试验。
报告了 POAG 干预措施的随机临床试验,并包括包括性别和种族/族裔在内的人口统计学亚组。
使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,2 名独立评审员提取了随机效应荟萃分析的研究水平数据。第三名人员作为研究选择的决胜者。使用 Microsoft Excel 2016(Microsoft Corporation)和 SAS,版本 9.4(SAS Institute)进行数据收集和分析。
主要结果是根据试验开始年份、研究区域和研究赞助商,每个试验中每个人口统计学亚组(白人、黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、其他种族/族裔群体以及女性或男性)的患病率。参与率以百分比表示。
共有 105 项临床试验被纳入荟萃分析,包括 33428 名 POAG 临床试验参与者(18404 名女性[55.1%])。总体而言,70.7%是白人患者,16.8%是黑人患者,3.4%是西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者,9.1%是其他种族/族裔,包括亚洲人、夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民、美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民和美国人口普查定义的未报告种族/族裔。按种族/族裔划分的参与者平均(SD)人数为白人 236.5(208.2),黑人 58.4(70.0),西班牙裔/拉丁裔 29.9(71.1),其他种族/族裔 31.1(94.3)。根据 Cochrane 风险偏倚工具进行的异质性检验,I2 统计量为 98%,表明纳入试验的结果存在高度异质性。进行了多元线性回归分析,以评估黑人参与者的参与情况与研究开始年份、研究所在地区和研究赞助商之间的任何趋势和显著性。从 1994 年到 2019 年,黑人参与者的招募人数没有显著增加(r2=0.11;P=0.17),黑人参与者的招募与临床试验区域之间也没有显著关联(r2=0.16;P=0.50),但黑人参与者的招募与研究赞助商之间存在显著关联(r2=0.94;P=0.03)。
这项荟萃分析发现,与白人相比,尽管疾病人群中少数民族的患病率较高,但他们在 POAG 临床试验中的参与率非常低。尽管采取了措施来增加临床试验的多样性,但黑人的临床试验参与人数并没有显著增加,而黑人是受这种疾病影响最大的群体;这种在 POAG 临床试验代表性方面的差异可能会引发对已批准的治疗这种疾病的医疗干预措施的真正安全性和有效性的质疑,应进一步研究如何增加 POAG 临床试验的多样性。