• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族和民族在原发性开角型青光眼临床试验中的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

New York Ophthalmology Associates, Manhattan.

School of Health Sciences and Practice & Institute of Public Health, New York Medical College, Valhalla.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348
PMID:34003274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8132140/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The disease burden for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is highest among racial/ethnic minority groups, particularly Black individuals. The prevalence of POAG worldwide is projected to increase from 52.7 million in 2020 to 79.8 million in 2040, a 51.4% increase attributed mainly to Asian and African individuals. Given this increase, key stakeholders need to pay particular attention to creating a diverse study population in POAG clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of racial/ethnic minorities in POAG clinical research trials compared with White individuals.

DATA SOURCES

This meta-analysis consisted of publicly available POAG clinical trials using ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Drugs@FDA from 1994 to 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials that reported on interventions for POAG and included demographic subgroups including sex and race/ethnicity.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 2 independent reviewers extracted study-level data for a random-effects meta-analysis. A third person served as the tiebreaker on study selection. Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation) and SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute) were used for data collection and analyses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the prevalence of each demographic subgroup (White, Black, Hispanic/Latino, other race/ethnicity groups, and female or male) in each trial according to the trial start year, study region, and study sponsor. Participation rates are expressed as percentages.

RESULTS

A total of 105 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis, including 33 428 POAG clinical trial participants (18 404 women [55.1%]). Overall, 70.7% were White patients, 16.8% were Black patients, 3.4% were Hispanic/Latino patients, and 9.1% were individuals of other races/ethnicities, including Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, and unreported as defined by the US Census. The mean (SD) numbers of participants by race/ethnicity were 236.5 (208.2) for White, 58.4 (70.0) for Black, 29.9 (71.1) for Hispanic/Latino, and 31.1 (94.3) for other race/ethnicity. According to the test for heterogeneity using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, the I2 statistic was 98%, indicating high heterogeneity of outcomes in the included trials. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess any trend and significance between participation by Black individuals and the year the study started, the region in which the study took place, and the study sponsor. There was no significant increase of Black participant enrollment from 1994 to 2019 (r2 = 0.11; P = .17) and no significant association between Black participant enrollment and clinical trial region (r2 = 0.16; P = .50), but there was a significant association between Black participant enrollment and study sponsor (r2 = 0.94; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis found that compared with White individuals, individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups had a very low participation rate in POAG clinical trials despite having a higher prevalence among the disease population. Despite measures to increase clinical trial diversity, there has not been a significant increase in clinical trial participation among Black individuals, the group most affected by this disease; this disparity in POAG clinical trial representation can raise questions about the true safety and efficacy of approved medical interventions for this disease and should prompt further research on how to increase POAG clinical trial diversity.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe64/8132140/29f6d94e2e7f/jamanetwopen-e218348-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe64/8132140/7eccae4c1aae/jamanetwopen-e218348-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe64/8132140/fa7b7b222a1c/jamanetwopen-e218348-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe64/8132140/29f6d94e2e7f/jamanetwopen-e218348-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe64/8132140/7eccae4c1aae/jamanetwopen-e218348-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe64/8132140/fa7b7b222a1c/jamanetwopen-e218348-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe64/8132140/29f6d94e2e7f/jamanetwopen-e218348-g003.jpg
摘要

重要性

原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)的疾病负担在种族/族裔少数群体中最高,尤其是黑人。预计全球 POAG 的患病率将从 2020 年的 5270 万增加到 2040 年的 7980 万,增幅为 51.4%,主要归因于亚洲和非洲个体。鉴于这种增长,主要利益相关者需要特别关注在 POAG 临床试验中创建多样化的研究人群。

目的

评估与白人相比,POAG 临床研究试验中少数民族的患病率。

数据来源

本荟萃分析包括使用 ClinicalTrials.gov、PubMed 和 Drugs@FDA 从 1994 年至 2019 年期间的公开 POAG 临床研究试验。

研究选择

报告了 POAG 干预措施的随机临床试验,并包括包括性别和种族/族裔在内的人口统计学亚组。

数据提取和综合

使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,2 名独立评审员提取了随机效应荟萃分析的研究水平数据。第三名人员作为研究选择的决胜者。使用 Microsoft Excel 2016(Microsoft Corporation)和 SAS,版本 9.4(SAS Institute)进行数据收集和分析。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是根据试验开始年份、研究区域和研究赞助商,每个试验中每个人口统计学亚组(白人、黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、其他种族/族裔群体以及女性或男性)的患病率。参与率以百分比表示。

结果

共有 105 项临床试验被纳入荟萃分析,包括 33428 名 POAG 临床试验参与者(18404 名女性[55.1%])。总体而言,70.7%是白人患者,16.8%是黑人患者,3.4%是西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者,9.1%是其他种族/族裔,包括亚洲人、夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民、美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民和美国人口普查定义的未报告种族/族裔。按种族/族裔划分的参与者平均(SD)人数为白人 236.5(208.2),黑人 58.4(70.0),西班牙裔/拉丁裔 29.9(71.1),其他种族/族裔 31.1(94.3)。根据 Cochrane 风险偏倚工具进行的异质性检验,I2 统计量为 98%,表明纳入试验的结果存在高度异质性。进行了多元线性回归分析,以评估黑人参与者的参与情况与研究开始年份、研究所在地区和研究赞助商之间的任何趋势和显著性。从 1994 年到 2019 年,黑人参与者的招募人数没有显著增加(r2=0.11;P=0.17),黑人参与者的招募与临床试验区域之间也没有显著关联(r2=0.16;P=0.50),但黑人参与者的招募与研究赞助商之间存在显著关联(r2=0.94;P=0.03)。

结论和相关性

这项荟萃分析发现,与白人相比,尽管疾病人群中少数民族的患病率较高,但他们在 POAG 临床试验中的参与率非常低。尽管采取了措施来增加临床试验的多样性,但黑人的临床试验参与人数并没有显著增加,而黑人是受这种疾病影响最大的群体;这种在 POAG 临床试验代表性方面的差异可能会引发对已批准的治疗这种疾病的医疗干预措施的真正安全性和有效性的质疑,应进一步研究如何增加 POAG 临床试验的多样性。

相似文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.种族和民族在原发性开角型青光眼临床试验中的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348.
2
Assessment of the Inclusion of Racial/Ethnic Minority, Female, and Older Individuals in Vaccine Clinical Trials.评估种族/少数民族、女性和老年人在疫苗临床试验中的纳入情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037640. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37640.
3
Disparities in the Inclusion of Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups and Older Adults in Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials: A Meta-analysis.种族和少数民族以及老年人群体在前列腺癌临床试验中纳入情况的差异:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;9(2):180-187. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5511.
4
Racial and Ethnic Minorities Underrepresented in Pain Management Guidelines for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.在全膝关节置换术疼痛管理指南中代表性不足的少数族裔:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1698-1706. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003026. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
Representation of Race and Ethnicity in Randomized Clinical Trials of Diabetic Macular Edema and Retinal Vein Occlusion Compared to 2010 US Census Data.糖尿病性黄斑水肿和视网膜静脉阻塞的随机临床试验中种族和民族的代表性与 2010 年美国人口普查数据相比。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 1;140(11):1096-1102. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3929.
6
Reporting of Participant Race and Ethnicity in Published US Pediatric Clinical Trials From 2011 to 2020.报告 2011 年至 2020 年美国儿科临床试验中参与者的种族和民族情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 May 1;176(5):e220142. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0142. Epub 2022 May 2.
7
Enrollment of Older Patients, Women, and Racial and Ethnic Minority Individuals in Valvular Heart Disease Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.老年患者、女性以及种族和少数民族个体在心脏瓣膜病临床试验中的入组情况:一项系统评价。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;8(9):871-878. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2098.
8
Race and Ethnicity Representation in Phase 2/3 Oncology Clinical Trial Publications: A Systematic Review.种族和民族在 2/3 期肿瘤临床试验出版物中的代表性:一项系统评价。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241388. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1388.
9
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment Among Women With Gynecologic Cancer.妇科癌症女性患者参与临床试验中的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2346494. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46494.
10
Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes by Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic-Review and Meta-analysis.COVID-19结局在种族、族裔和社会经济地位方面的差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134147. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34147.

引用本文的文献

1
Ensemble learning to enhance accurate identification of patients with glaucoma using electronic health records.使用电子健康记录的集成学习以提高青光眼患者的准确识别
JAMIA Open. 2025 Aug 10;8(4):ooaf080. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf080. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Clinical Studies Reported to ClinicalTrials.gov, 2009-2024.2009 - 2024年向ClinicalTrials.gov报告的临床研究中的种族和族裔多样性
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 21:2025.07.21.25331865. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.21.25331865.
3
Understanding Glaucoma: Why it Remains a Leading Cause of Blindness Worldwide.

本文引用的文献

1
The Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals: Comments Invited.医学与科学期刊中种族和民族的报告:诚邀评论。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 16;325(11):1049-1052. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.2104.
2
Enrollment of Racial Minorities in Clinical Trials: Old Problem Assumes New Urgency in the Age of Immunotherapy.临床试验中少数族裔的招募:在免疫治疗时代,老问题有了新的紧迫性。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:3-10. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_100021. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials: Overcoming Critical Barriers.
了解青光眼:为何它仍是全球失明的主要原因。
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2025 Jul;242(7):712-717. doi: 10.1055/a-2617-1575. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
4
Racial, ethnic, sex, and age representation in clinical trials of radiopharmaceutical tumor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.放射性药物肿瘤治疗临床试验中的种族、族裔、性别和年龄代表性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1092. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14527-9.
5
Affordable Sinskey Hook Goniotomy and Cataract Surgery in Black and Afro-Latino Patients Diagnosed with Glaucoma: Retrospective Real-World One-Year Results.为患有青光眼的黑人和非裔拉丁裔患者提供的经济实惠的辛斯基钩切开术和白内障手术:回顾性真实世界一年结果
J Clin Med. 2025 May 8;14(10):3266. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103266.
6
Rho Kinase (ROCK) Inhibitors in the Treatment of Glaucoma and Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review of Early to Late Phase Clinical Trials.Rho激酶(ROCK)抑制剂在青光眼及青光眼手术治疗中的应用:早期至晚期临床试验的系统评价
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;18(4):523. doi: 10.3390/ph18040523.
7
Artificial Intelligence Models to Identify Patients at High Risk for Glaucoma Using Self-reported Health Data in a United States National Cohort.利用美国全国队列中的自我报告健康数据,通过人工智能模型识别青光眼高危患者。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Dec 17;5(3):100685. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100685. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
8
Artificial Intelligence Models to Identify Patients with High Probability of Glaucoma Using Electronic Health Records.利用电子健康记录的人工智能模型识别青光眼高风险患者。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Dec 6;5(3):100671. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100671. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
9
Inequities in glaucoma research: an analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews and randomized trials.青光眼研究中的不平等现象:对Cochrane系统评价和随机试验的分析
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May;181:111717. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111717. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
10
Risk for Ocular Hypertension With Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implants in Black and White Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的黑人和白人患者眼内植入地塞米松后发生高眼压的风险
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2025 Jan 8:24741264241309685. doi: 10.1177/24741264241309685.
提高临床试验的多样性:克服关键障碍。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019 May;44(5):148-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
4
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Genetics in African Americans.非裔美国人原发性开角型青光眼的遗传学
Curr Genet Med Rep. 2017 Dec;5(4):167-174. doi: 10.1007/s40142-017-0131-8. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Individuals of African Descent: A Review of Risk Factors.非洲裔个体原发性开角型青光眼:危险因素综述
J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;6(4). doi: 10.4172/2155-9570.1000450. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
6
Late-day intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and tolerability of travoprost 0.004% versus bimatoprost 0.01% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a randomized trial.0.004%曲伏前列素与0.01%比马前列素降低开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者日间眼压的疗效及耐受性比较:一项随机试验
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov 28;14:151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-151.
7
Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球青光眼患病率及 2040 年青光眼负担预测:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
8
The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review.青光眼的病理生理学和治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1901-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192.
9
Intracameral triamcinolone acetonide in glaucoma surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.房水内注射曲安奈德在青光眼手术中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;158(2):395-401.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.027. Epub 2014 May 2.
10
Socioeconomic disparity in use of eye care services among US adults with age-related eye diseases: National Health Interview Survey, 2002 and 2008.美国年龄相关性眼病患者中眼科保健服务利用的社会经济差异:2002 年和 2008 年全国健康访谈调查。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;131(9):1198-206. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4694.