• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科重症监护病房研究参与的种族和民族差异。

Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Approach for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Research Participation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411375. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11375.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11375
PMID:38748423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11096993/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

While disparities in consent rates for research have been reported in multiple adult and pediatric settings, limited data informing enrollment in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) research are available. Acute care settings such as the PICU present unique challenges for study enrollment, given the highly stressful and emotional environment for caregivers and the time-sensitive nature of the studies.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether race and ethnicity, language, religion, and Social Deprivation Index (SDI) were associated with disparate approach and consent rates in PICU research.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was performed at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia PICU between July 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. Participants included patients eligible for studies requiring prospective consent. Data were analyzed from February 2 to July 26, 2022.

EXPOSURE

Exposures included race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White, and other), language (Arabic, English, Spanish, and other), religion (Christian, Jewish, Muslim, none, and other), and SDI (composite of multiple socioeconomic indicators).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Multivariable regressions separately tested associations between the 4 exposures (race and ethnicity, language, religion, and SDI) and 3 outcomes (rates of approach among eligible patients, consent among eligible patients, and consent among those approached). The degree to which reduced rates of approach mediated the association between lower consent in Black children was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 3154 children included in the study (median age, 6 [IQR, 1.9-12.5] years; 1691 [53.6%] male), rates of approach and consent were lower for Black and Hispanic families and those of other races, speakers of Arabic and other languages, Muslim families, and those with worse SDI. Among children approached for research, lower consent odds persisted for those of Black race (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.97]; adjusted OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.49-0.93]) relative to White race. Mediation analysis revealed that 51.0% (95% CI, 11.8%-90.2%) of the reduced odds of consent for Black individuals was mediated by lower probability of approach.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of consent rates for PICU research, multiple sociodemographic factors were associated with lower rates of consent, partly attributable to disparate rates of approach. These findings suggest opportunities for reducing disparities in PICU research participation.

摘要

重要性

尽管在多个成人和儿科环境中已经报告了研究同意率的差异,但可供参考的儿科重症监护病房 (PICU) 研究入组数据有限。由于照顾者的环境高度紧张和情绪化,以及研究的时间敏感性,像 PICU 这样的急性护理环境对研究入组提出了独特的挑战。

目的

确定种族和民族、语言、宗教和社会剥夺指数 (SDI) 是否与 PICU 研究中的不同接触和同意率相关。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,在费城儿童医院 PICU 进行,时间为 2011 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日。参与者包括符合需要前瞻性同意的研究标准的患者。数据分析于 2022 年 2 月 2 日至 7 月 26 日进行。

暴露

暴露因素包括种族和民族(黑人、西班牙裔、白人及其他)、语言(阿拉伯语、英语、西班牙语及其他)、宗教(基督教、犹太教、伊斯兰教、无宗教信仰及其他)和 SDI(多种社会经济指标的综合)。

主要结果和测量

多元回归分别检验了 4 个暴露因素(种族和民族、语言、宗教和 SDI)与 3 个结果(合格患者中的接触率、合格患者中的同意率和已接触患者中的同意率)之间的关联。还评估了降低接触率的程度在多大程度上减轻了黑人儿童同意率较低的关联。

结果

在这项研究中,共有 3154 名儿童(中位数年龄为 6 岁[IQR,1.9-12.5];1691 名男性[53.6%]),黑人及西班牙裔家庭和其他种族、讲阿拉伯语和其他语言、穆斯林家庭以及 SDI 较差的家庭,其接触和同意的比例较低。在接受研究接触的儿童中,黑人种族的儿童的同意率仍然较低(未经调整的优势比[OR],0.73[95%CI,0.55-0.97];调整后的 OR,0.68[95%CI,0.49-0.93]),而白人种族的儿童则较低。中介分析显示,黑人个体同意率降低的 51.0%(95%CI,11.8%-90.2%)可归因于接触率较低。

结论和相关性

在这项关于 PICU 研究同意率的队列研究中,多个社会人口因素与较低的同意率相关,部分原因是接触率存在差异。这些发现表明,有机会减少 PICU 研究参与方面的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/12adc13b1a9b/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/44d3a56b0c08/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/8266a2d4a101/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/c2a620f98e4d/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/12adc13b1a9b/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/44d3a56b0c08/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/8266a2d4a101/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/c2a620f98e4d/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b498/11096993/12adc13b1a9b/jamanetwopen-e2411375-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Approach for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Research Participation.儿科重症监护病房研究参与的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411375. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11375.
2
Identifying and Mitigating Disparities in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Minoritized Racial, Ethnic, and Language Groups.识别和减轻少数种族、族裔和语言群体中心静脉相关血流感染的差异。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Jul 1;177(7):700-709. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.1379.
3
Pediatric intensive care unit mortality among Latino children before and after a multilevel health care delivery intervention.儿科重症监护病房死亡率在多层次医疗保健提供干预前后的拉丁裔儿童中。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):383-90. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3789.
4
The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.
5
Race and Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Factors, and Epigenetic Age Acceleration in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.种族和民族、社会经济因素与儿童癌症幸存者的表观遗传年龄加速。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2419771. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19771.
6
Race, Ethnicity, and Intensive Care Utilization for Common Pediatric Diagnoses: U.S. Pediatric Health Information System 2019 Database Study.种族、民族与常见儿科疾病的重症监护利用:美国儿科健康信息系统 2019 数据库研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 1;25(9):828-837. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003487. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
Preferred Language and Race Impact Code Status in Critically Ill Children.首选语言和种族对危重症儿童的医疗决策状态有影响。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Dec 18;6(12):e1192. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001192. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
8
The effect of neighborhood and individual characteristics on pediatric critical illness.邻里环境和个体特征对儿童危重病的影响。
J Community Health. 2014 Aug;39(4):753-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9823-0.
9
A multi-state analysis on the effect of deprivation and race on PICU admission and mortality in children receiving Medicaid in United States (2007-2014).美国接受医疗补助的儿童在重症监护病房入院和死亡方面贫困和种族影响的多状态分析(2007-2014 年)。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05031-3.
10
Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Disparities in Mortality Based on Race and Ethnicity.基于种族和民族的急诊科儿科准备情况和死亡率差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2332160. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32160.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Consent Models Perpetuate Ignorance in Pediatric Critical Care.当前的同意模式使儿科重症监护中的无知长期存在。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 May 1;26(5):e748-e750. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003730. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
2
A step in the right direction.朝着正确方向迈出的一步。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 Aug 1;20(8):1223. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11226.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying and improving the "ground truth" of race in disparities research through improved EMR data reporting. A systematic review.通过改进电子病历数据报告来确定和改善差异研究中“真实种族”,系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Feb;182:105303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105303. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
2
Pediatric cancer patient emergency department visits and disposition by sociodemographic and economic characteristics.儿科癌症患者按社会人口学和经济特征就诊的急诊部门和处置方式。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Nov;70(11):e30636. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30636. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
Disparities in pediatric cancer survivorship care: A systematic review.
儿科癌症生存者照护中的差异:系统回顾。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(17):18281-18305. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6426. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
4
Evaluating Demographic Representation in Clinical Trials: Use of the Adaptive Coronavirus Disease 2019 Treatment Trial (ACTT) as a Test Case.评估临床试验中的人口统计学代表性:以2019年适应性冠状病毒病治疗试验(ACTT)为例
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 May 27;10(6):ofad290. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad290. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Race and Ethnicity Reporting and Representation in Pediatric Clinical Trials.儿科临床试验中的种族和族裔报告与呈现
Pediatrics. 2023 Apr 1;151(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058552.
6
Barriers to enrollment in a pediatric critical care biorepository.儿科重症监护生物库入组障碍。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Aug;94(2):803-810. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02465-w. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
7
Public knowledge and information sources for clinical trials among adults in the USA: evidence from a Health Information National Trends Survey in 2020.美国成年人对临床试验的公共知识和信息来源:来自 2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查的证据。
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Sep;22(5):416-422. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0107. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
8
Discrepancies in Race and Ethnicity in the Electronic Health Record Compared to Self-report.电子健康记录中的种族和民族差异与自我报告相比。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Dec;10(6):2670-2675. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01445-w. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
9
Inclusion of Non-English-Speaking Participants in Pediatric Health Research: A Review.纳入非英语为母语的参与者于儿科健康研究之探讨。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Jan 1;177(1):81-88. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3828.
10
Race/ethnicity reporting and representation in US clinical trials: a cohort study.美国临床试验中的种族/族裔报告与代表性:一项队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jul;11. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100252. Epub 2022 Apr 10.