• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化可改变风险因素对癌症发病率和死亡率的社会经济不平等的贡献:一项基于全国代表性人群的队列研究。

Quantifying the contribution of modifiable risk factors to socio-economic inequities in cancer morbidity and mortality: a nationally representative population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Department of Sociology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Nov 10;50(5):1498-1511. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab067.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyab067
PMID:33846746
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared with those with a higher socio-economic position (SEP), individuals with a lower SEP have higher cancer morbidity and mortality. However, the contribution of modifiable risk factors to these inequities is not known. This study aimed to quantify the mediating effects of modifiable risk factors to associations between SEP and cancer morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

This study used a prospective observational cohort design. We combined eight cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2000/2001-2011) as baseline data to identify a cohort of adults (≥35 years) without cancer at the time of survey administration (n = 309 800). The cohort was linked to the Discharge Abstract Database and the Canadian Mortality Database for cancer morbidity and mortality ascertainment. Individuals were followed from the date they completed the Canadian Community Health Survey until 31 March 2013. Dates of individual first hospitalizations for cancer and deaths due to cancer were captured during this time period. SEP was operationalized using a latent variable combining measures of education and household income. Self-reported modifiable risk factors, including smoking, excess alcohol consumption, low fruit-and-vegetable intake, physical inactivity and obesity, were considered as potential mediators. Generalized structural equation modelling was used to estimate the mediating effects of modifiable risk factors in associations between low SEP and cancer morbidity and mortality in the total population and stratified by sex.

RESULTS

Modifiable risk factors together explained 45.6% of associations between low SEP and overall cancer morbidity and mortality. Smoking was the most important mediator in the total population and for males, accounting for 15.5% and 40.2% of the total effect, respectively. For females, obesity was the most important mediator.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifiable risk factors are important mediators of socio-economic inequities in cancer morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, more than half of the variance in these associations remained unexplained. Midstream interventions that target modifiable risk factors may help to alleviate inequities in cancer risk in the short term. However, ultimately, upstream interventions that target structural determinants of health are needed to reduce overall socio-economic inequities in cancer morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

与社会经济地位较高的人群相比,社会经济地位较低的人群癌症发病率和死亡率更高。然而,可改变的风险因素对这些不公平现象的贡献尚不清楚。本研究旨在量化可改变的风险因素对社会经济地位与癌症发病率和死亡率之间关联的中介作用。

方法

本研究采用前瞻性观察性队列设计。我们结合了加拿大社区健康调查的八个周期(2000/2001 年至 2011 年)作为基线数据,以确定一个在调查时没有癌症的成年人队列(≥35 岁)(n=309800)。该队列与出院摘要数据库和加拿大死亡率数据库相链接,以确定癌症发病率和死亡率。从完成加拿大社区健康调查之日起,对个体进行随访,直至 2013 年 3 月 31 日。在此期间,记录了个体首次因癌症住院和因癌症死亡的日期。社会经济地位通过结合教育和家庭收入衡量的潜在变量来运作。自我报告的可改变的风险因素,包括吸烟、过量饮酒、低水果和蔬菜摄入、身体活动不足和肥胖,被视为潜在的中介因素。广义结构方程模型用于估计可改变的风险因素在社会经济地位较低与癌症发病率和死亡率之间的关联中的中介作用,该模型在总人群和按性别分层的人群中进行了评估。

结果

可改变的风险因素共同解释了低社会经济地位与整体癌症发病率和死亡率之间 45.6%的关联。在总人群和男性中,吸烟是最重要的中介因素,分别占总效应的 15.5%和 40.2%。对于女性,肥胖是最重要的中介因素。

结论

可改变的风险因素是癌症发病率和死亡率社会经济不公平的重要中介因素。然而,这些关联的方差仍有一半以上无法解释。针对可改变的风险因素的中游干预措施可能有助于在短期内减轻癌症风险的不公平现象。然而,最终需要针对健康结构决定因素的上游干预措施来减少癌症发病率和死亡率方面的整体社会经济不公平现象。

相似文献

1
Quantifying the contribution of modifiable risk factors to socio-economic inequities in cancer morbidity and mortality: a nationally representative population-based cohort study.量化可改变风险因素对癌症发病率和死亡率的社会经济不平等的贡献:一项基于全国代表性人群的队列研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Nov 10;50(5):1498-1511. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab067.
2
The contribution of modifiable risk factors to socioeconomic inequities in cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: A nationally representative population-based cohort study.可改变的风险因素对心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的社会经济不平等的贡献:一项全国代表性的基于人群的队列研究。
Prev Med. 2023 Jun;171:107497. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107497. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
3
Reducing socio-economic inequalities in all-cause mortality: a counterfactual mediation approach.减少全因死亡率的社会经济不平等:反事实中介方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 1;49(2):497-510. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz248.
4
Socio-economic inequities in emergency department visits for wholly alcohol-attributable acute and chronic harms in Canada, 2003-2017.2003-2017 年加拿大因完全归因于酒精的急性和慢性伤害而就诊于急诊科的社会经济不平等。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 May;43(4):927-936. doi: 10.1111/dar.13821. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
5
Mechanisms underlying social inequality in post-menopausal breast cancer.绝经后乳腺癌社会不平等背后的机制。
Dan Med J. 2014 Oct;61(10):B4922.
6
Socioeconomic inequities in alcohol-attributable mortality by sex/gender and age in Canada: A 13-year population-representative cohort study.加拿大按性别和年龄划分的酒精所致死亡率的社会经济不平等:一项为期13年的全国代表性队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae385.
7
Stress-Related Poor Diet Quality Does Not Explain Socioeconomic Inequities in Health: A Structural Equation Mediation Analysis of Gender-Specific Pathways.压力相关的不良饮食质量并不能解释健康方面的社会经济不平等:基于性别特异性途径的结构方程中介分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Mar;122(3):541-554.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
8
Socioeconomic inequities in diet quality among a nationally representative sample of adults living in Canada: an analysis of trends between 2004 and 2015.加拿大成年人中具有代表性的全国样本中,饮食质量的社会经济不平等:2004 年至 2015 年期间趋势的分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Nov 8;114(5):1814-1829. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab249.
9
Socio-economic inequities in mental health problems and wellbeing among women working in the apparel and floriculture sectors: testing the mediating role of psychological capital, social support and tangible assets.服装和花卉行业从业女性心理健康问题与幸福感方面的社会经济不平等:检验心理资本、社会支持和有形资产的中介作用
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18678-5.
10
Trends in Socioeconomic Inequities in Diet Quality between 2004 and 2015 among a Nationally Representative Sample of Children in Canada.加拿大全国代表性儿童样本中,2004 年至 2015 年期间饮食质量的社会经济不平等趋势。
J Nutr. 2021 Dec 3;151(12):3781-3794. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab297.

引用本文的文献

1
Embodying disadvantage: a theoretically-informed analysis of pathways linking socioeconomic position with all-cause and cancer mortality in a nationally representative cohort of adults in Canada.体现劣势:对加拿大全国代表性成年人群体中社会经济地位与全因死亡率和癌症死亡率之间联系途径的理论分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;25(1):2533. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23728-7.
2
Association Between Comorbidity Clusters and Mortality in Patients With Cancer: Predictive Modeling Using Machine Learning Approaches of Data From the United States and Hong Kong.癌症患者共病集群与死亡率之间的关联:使用来自美国和香港的数据的机器学习方法进行预测建模
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 16;11:e71937. doi: 10.2196/71937.
3
Analysis of long-term trends and 15-year predictions of smoking-related bladder cancer burden in china across different age and sex groups from 1990 to 2021.
1990年至2021年中国不同年龄和性别组吸烟相关膀胱癌负担的长期趋势分析及15年预测
Discov Oncol. 2025 Mar 27;16(1):408. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02157-3.
4
Use of mortality tables by level of deprivation in the study of social inequalities in cancer survival.在癌症生存社会不平等研究中按贫困程度使用死亡率表。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;40(2):213-223. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01199-1. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
5
Impact of pan-cancer analysis of the exportins family on prognosis, the tumor microenvironment and its potential therapeutic efficacy.输出蛋白家族的泛癌分析对预后、肿瘤微环境及其潜在治疗效果的影响
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01534-6.
6
Socio-Economic Inequalities in Beliefs About Cancer and its Causes: Evidence From two Population Surveys.关于癌症及其病因认知的社会经济不平等:来自两项人口调查的证据
Psychooncology. 2024 Dec;33(12):e70035. doi: 10.1002/pon.70035.
7
Causal effects of genetic birth weight and gestational age on adult esophageal diseases: Mendelian randomization study.出生体重和孕周的遗传因素对成人食管疾病的因果效应:孟德尔随机化研究
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):3055-3068. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i7.3055.
8
Socioeconomic traits and the risk of Barrett's esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A Mendelian randomization study.社会经济特征与巴雷特食管和胃食管反流病的风险:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Jun 15;16(6):2631-2645. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2631.
9
Associations of educational attainment with Sepsis mediated by metabolism traits and smoking: a Mendelian randomization study.受代谢特征和吸烟影响的教育程度与脓毒症的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;12:1330606. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1330606. eCollection 2024.
10
Socioeconomic inequalities in health-related fitness gradient shifts between 2001 and 2022 in young Polish adults.2001 年至 2022 年期间,波兰年轻成年人健康相关体能梯度变化中的社会经济不平等现象。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 9;11:1163215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163215. eCollection 2023.