• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者共病集群与死亡率之间的关联:使用来自美国和香港的数据的机器学习方法进行预测建模

Association Between Comorbidity Clusters and Mortality in Patients With Cancer: Predictive Modeling Using Machine Learning Approaches of Data From the United States and Hong Kong.

作者信息

Lam Chun Sing, Hua Rong, Loong Herbert Ho-Fung, Ngan Chun-Kit, Cheung Yin Ting

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 8th Floor, Lo Kwee-Seong Integrated Biomedical Sciences Building, Area 39, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T, Hong Kong, China, 852 39436833.

Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 16;11:e71937. doi: 10.2196/71937.

DOI:10.2196/71937
PMID:40669089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12286590/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer and cancer survivors often experience multiple chronic health conditions, which can impact symptom burden and treatment outcomes. Despite the high prevalence of multimorbidity, research on cancer prognosis has predominantly focused on cancers in isolation. There is growing interest in machine learning techniques for cancer studies. However, these methods have not been applied in the context of supportive care for patients with cancer who have multimorbidity. Furthermore, few studies have investigated the associations between comorbidity clusters and mortality outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated comorbidity clusters among patients with cancer using machine learning and examined their associations with mortality outcomes in two large representative samples from the United States and Hong Kong.

METHODS

This study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Hospital Authority Data Collaboration Laboratory (HADCL). Participants aged ≥20 years with a history of cancer were included. The study used a two-step framework to identify clusters of comorbidities in NHANES. In the first step, we used four machine learning techniques, including the Bernoulli mixture model and partition-based methods, to cluster the comorbidities. In the second step, domain experts reviewed and ranked the identified clusters to ensure clinical relevance. The clusters that had the highest average rank were selected for further analysis. The associations between comorbidity clusters and mortality outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. We conducted an external validation to evaluate the generalizability of the clusters identified in the NHANES cohort and their associations with mortality using HADCL. The same number of clusters was replicated based on the distinctive patterns and distribution of comorbidities observed within each cluster.

RESULTS

The study included 4390 participants in NHANES and 12,484 participants in HADCL. Four comorbidity clusters were identified: low comorbidity, metabolic, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and respiratory. In NHANES, participants in the respiratory cluster had the highest risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.62, 95% CI 1.26-2.08; P<.001), followed by the CVD cluster (aHR 1.50, 95% CI 1.26-1.80; P<.001) compared to the low comorbidity cluster. The 3 clusters were associated with higher risks of CVD-related mortality (aHR 1.48-3.05, 95% CI 1.14-4.07; P<.003). The effects of comorbidity clusters on mortality were modified by income-to-poverty ratio (P for interaction=.04), diet quality (P for interaction=.02), and cancer prognosis (P for interaction=.005). In the HADCL (validation) cohort, participants in the respiratory and CVD clusters had a higher risk of all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

High comorbidity burden clusters showed increased all-cause and CVD-related mortality in patients with cancer. These findings highlight the significance of considering comorbidity burden in cancer care. Machine learning approaches can provide valuable insights into complex multimorbidity profiles. Further research is needed to deepen understanding of the relationships between multimorbidity and cancer-specific outcomes.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/0bd8f5f476fd/cancer-v11-e71937-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/a34f5808a9ea/cancer-v11-e71937-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/b6fd4a66b7e7/cancer-v11-e71937-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/54429e8dcd02/cancer-v11-e71937-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/0bd8f5f476fd/cancer-v11-e71937-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/a34f5808a9ea/cancer-v11-e71937-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/b6fd4a66b7e7/cancer-v11-e71937-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/54429e8dcd02/cancer-v11-e71937-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312e/12286590/0bd8f5f476fd/cancer-v11-e71937-g004.jpg
摘要

背景

癌症患者及癌症幸存者常常患有多种慢性健康问题,这可能会影响症状负担和治疗结果。尽管多重疾病的患病率很高,但癌症预后的研究主要集中在单一癌症上。机器学习技术在癌症研究中的应用越来越受到关注。然而,这些方法尚未应用于患有多重疾病的癌症患者的支持性护理背景中。此外,很少有研究调查合并症集群与死亡率结果之间的关联。

目的

本研究使用机器学习调查癌症患者中的合并症集群,并在来自美国和香港的两个大型代表性样本中检查它们与死亡率结果的关联。

方法

本研究使用了来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)和医院管理局数据协作实验室(HADCL)的数据。纳入年龄≥20岁且有癌症病史的参与者。该研究使用两步框架来识别NHANES中的合并症集群。第一步,我们使用四种机器学习技术,包括伯努利混合模型和基于分区的方法,对合并症进行聚类。第二步,领域专家对识别出的集群进行审查和排名,以确保临床相关性。选择平均排名最高的集群进行进一步分析。使用Cox比例风险模型分析合并症集群与死亡率结果之间的关联。我们进行了外部验证,以评估在NHANES队列中识别出的集群的普遍性及其与使用HADCL的死亡率的关联。根据每个集群中观察到的合并症的独特模式和分布,复制相同数量的集群。

结果

该研究包括NHANES中的4390名参与者和HADCL中的12484名参与者。识别出四个合并症集群:低合并症、代谢、心血管疾病(CVD)和呼吸系统。在NHANES中,与低合并症集群相比,呼吸系统集群的参与者全因死亡率风险最高(调整后风险比[aHR]1.62,95%置信区间1.26 - 2.08;P<.001),其次是CVD集群(aHR 1.50,95%置信区间1.26 - 1.80;P<.001)。这三个集群与CVD相关死亡率的较高风险相关(aHR 1.48 - 3.05,95%置信区间1.14 - 4.07;P<.003)。合并症集群对死亡率的影响因收入贫困比(交互作用P =.04)、饮食质量(交互作用P =.02)和癌症预后(交互作用P =.005)而有所改变。在HADCL(验证)队列中,呼吸系统和CVD集群的参与者全因死亡率风险较高。

结论

高合并症负担集群在癌症患者中显示出全因死亡率和CVD相关死亡率增加。这些发现突出了在癌症护理中考虑合并症负担的重要性。机器学习方法可以为复杂的多重疾病概况提供有价值的见解。需要进一步研究以加深对多重疾病与癌症特异性结果之间关系的理解。

相似文献

1
Association Between Comorbidity Clusters and Mortality in Patients With Cancer: Predictive Modeling Using Machine Learning Approaches of Data From the United States and Hong Kong.癌症患者共病集群与死亡率之间的关联:使用来自美国和香港的数据的机器学习方法进行预测建模
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 16;11:e71937. doi: 10.2196/71937.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
AI-based Hepatic Steatosis Detection and Integrated Hepatic Assessment from Cardiac CT Attenuation Scans Enhances All-cause Mortality Risk Stratification: A Multi-center Study.基于人工智能的心脏CT衰减扫描检测肝脂肪变性及综合肝脏评估可增强全因死亡风险分层:一项多中心研究
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.09.25329157. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.09.25329157.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.改善基层医疗和社区环境中患有多种疾病患者预后的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 14;3(3):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns and factors associated with the prescription of psychotropic medications after diagnosis of cancer in Chinese patients: A population-based cohort study.中文癌症患者诊断后精神药物处方的模式和相关因素:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Feb;33(2):e5754. doi: 10.1002/pds.5754.
2
Risk of recurrent advanced colorectal neoplasia in individuals with baseline non-advanced neoplasia followed up at 5 vs 7-10 years.基线无晚期结直肠腺瘤患者随访 5 年与随访 7-10 年相比,复发高级别结直肠腺瘤的风险。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;38(12):2122-2129. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16367. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Machine learning in precision diabetes care and cardiovascular risk prediction.
机器学习在精准糖尿病护理和心血管风险预测中的应用。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Sep 25;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01985-3.
4
Relative Burden of Cancer and Noncancer Mortality Among Long-Term Survivors of Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer in the US.美国乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌长期幸存者的癌症和非癌症死亡率的相对负担。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323115. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23115.
5
Distinct Impact of Noncardiac Comorbidities on Exercise Capacity and Functional Status in Chronic Heart Failure.非心脏合并症对慢性心力衰竭患者运动能力和功能状态的显著影响。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;11(10):1365-1376. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.05.018. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
Multimorbidity and Complexity Among Patients with Cancer in Ontario: A Retrospective Cohort Study Exploring the Clustering of 17 Chronic Conditions with Cancer.安大略省癌症患者的多病共存和复杂性:一项探索 17 种慢性疾病与癌症聚类的回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748221150393. doi: 10.1177/10732748221150393.
7
Association of dietary patterns and food groups intake with multimorbidity: A prospective cohort study.饮食模式和食物组摄入与多种疾病的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Oct;51:359-366. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.07.019. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
8
Novel machine learning models outperform risk scores in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral hepatitis.新型机器学习模型在预测慢性病毒性肝炎患者的肝细胞癌方面优于风险评分。
JHEP Rep. 2022 Jan 22;4(3):100441. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100441. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Multimorbidity clusters among long-term breast cancer survivors in Spain: Results of the SURBCAN study.西班牙长期乳腺癌幸存者的多种共病聚类:SURBCAN 研究结果。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Nov 15;149(10):1755-1767. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33736. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
10
Factors Explaining Socio-Economic Inequalities in Cancer Survival: A Systematic Review.解释癌症生存的社会经济不平等因素:系统评价。
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211011956. doi: 10.1177/10732748211011956.