Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换康复计划的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation programmes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Klinik für Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, 52249 Eschweiler, Germany. E-mail:

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2021 Jun 2;53(6):jrm00200. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2827.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of modified rehabilitation programmes in comparison with standard rehabilitation programmes after total knee arthroplasty through randomized controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC) and Cochrane Library databases in December 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials were reviewed if they compared a physiotherapy exercise intervention with usual or standard physiotherapy care, or if they compared 2 types of exercise physiotherapy interventions meeting the review criteria, after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials were included at the end of the screening process.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The outcomes were knee extension, knee flexion, pain visual analogue scale, overall Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 6-minute walking test, and Timed Up and Go test.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There was no clear pattern regarding which combination of starting time-point and duration of the rehabilitation programme after total knee arthroplasty significantly improves the clinical outcome when comparing modified rehabilitation programmes with standard programmes. Moreover, no particular modification to the modified programmes could be solely attributed to the improved clinical outcome in the 2 studies that showed significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

Modified rehabilitation programmes do not result in systematic improvement in clinical outcome over one-size-fits-all-approaches after total knee arthroplasty.

摘要

目的

通过随机对照试验,研究与标准康复方案相比,改良康复方案在全膝关节置换术后的效果。

资料来源

2020 年 12 月,在 PubMed、PubMed Central(PMC)和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了检索。

研究选择

如果物理治疗运动干预与常规或标准物理治疗护理进行比较,或者如果比较 2 种符合审查标准的运动物理治疗干预,则纳入随机对照试验。在筛选结束时,共纳入了 18 项随机对照试验。

资料提取

两名作者独立筛选文献、提取数据并评估纳入研究的质量。结果是膝关节伸展、膝关节屈曲、疼痛视觉模拟量表、整体西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、6 分钟步行测试和计时起立行走测试。

资料综合

在比较改良康复方案与标准方案时,关于全膝关节置换术后康复方案开始时间点和持续时间的哪种组合能显著改善临床结果,目前没有明确的模式。此外,在 2 项显示显著改善的研究中,没有特定的改良方案修改可以归因于临床结果的改善。

结论

与一刀切的方法相比,改良康复方案并不能系统地改善全膝关节置换术后的临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b9c/8814866/e55bf84e4b89/JRM-53-6-2784-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验