• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平衡照护需求和个人需求:基于叙事访谈的非正规痴呆症照护与个人生活协调的类型学。

Balancing care demands and personal needs: A typology on the reconciliation of informal dementia care with personal life based on narrative interviews.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, 37734University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Germany.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2021 Nov;20(8):2689-2707. doi: 10.1177/14713012211008306. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1177/14713012211008306
PMID:33847550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8670745/
Abstract

Finding a balance between care and personal needs is often challenging for individuals caring for a person with dementia. The present study aimed to understand how primary and secondary family carers of people with dementia perceive the reconciliation of informal care and their personal life throughout the course of care. Narrative interviews with 14 carers (=10 female, mean age: 48.79) from seven care networks were conducted. The interviews were analysed using the documentary method. The result was a relational type formation which comprises different process types: 'Respect your boundaries, stay calm, but plan ahead', 'Acting strategic is making it work', 'Reflect the situation, deal with it, and pull it through' and 'There is no alternative, you have to live with it'. This typology was based on two related dimensions: (prospective, strategic, reflective and limited) and the resulting (accepting, withstanding and enduring). The results yield implications for practice, such as considering individual needs and the care network to provide effective support and promoting the importance of self-care behaviours to achieve a balance between care and personal life.

摘要

在照顾痴呆症患者的过程中,个人常常难以在照顾和个人需求之间取得平衡。本研究旨在了解痴呆症患者的主要和次要家庭照顾者如何在整个护理过程中感知非正式护理和个人生活的协调。对来自七个护理网络的 14 名照顾者(=10 名女性,平均年龄:48.79 岁)进行了叙事访谈。使用文献法对访谈进行了分析。结果形成了一种关系类型,包括不同的过程类型:“尊重自己的界限,保持冷静,但提前计划”、“策略性行动是使事情顺利进行”、“反思情况,处理问题,克服困难”和“别无选择,只能接受”。这种分类基于两个相关维度:(前瞻性、策略性、反思性和有限性)和由此产生的(接受、承受和忍受)。研究结果对实践具有启示意义,例如考虑个人需求和护理网络,以提供有效的支持,并促进自我护理行为的重要性,以实现护理和个人生活之间的平衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151e/8670745/2a320c09365e/10.1177_14713012211008306-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151e/8670745/2a320c09365e/10.1177_14713012211008306-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151e/8670745/2a320c09365e/10.1177_14713012211008306-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Balancing care demands and personal needs: A typology on the reconciliation of informal dementia care with personal life based on narrative interviews.平衡照护需求和个人需求:基于叙事访谈的非正规痴呆症照护与个人生活协调的类型学。
Dementia (London). 2021 Nov;20(8):2689-2707. doi: 10.1177/14713012211008306. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
Dementia care-giving from a family network perspective in Germany: A typology.德国从家庭网络视角出发的痴呆症照护:一种类型学。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):579-591. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13161. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Informal caregivers' experiences of caring for persons with dementia in Estonia: A narrative study.爱沙尼亚非专业照护者照顾痴呆症患者的体验:一项叙事研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):448-455. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12877. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
4
Seeking the balance between caregiving in dementia, family and employment: study protocol for a mixed methods study in Northern Germany.探寻痴呆症护理、家庭与工作之间的平衡:德国北部一项混合方法研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 27;8(2):e019444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019444.
5
[Formal and informal support of patients with dementia at home: A mixed methods study within the Actifcare project].[家中痴呆症患者的正式与非正式照护:Actifcare项目中的一项混合方法研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Dec;139:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
[Compatibility of caring in dementia, family and employment].[痴呆症护理、家庭与就业的兼容性]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Nov;54(7):643-650. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01764-9. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
Carer Experience Supporting Someone With Dementia and Cancer: A Narrative Approach.照顾者支持患有痴呆症和癌症的人的体验:一种叙事方法。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Apr;28(5):813-823. doi: 10.1177/1049732317736285. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
8
Challenges and strategies in communication with people with dementia and their informal caregivers in community pharmacies - a narrative approach.社区药房与痴呆症患者及其非专业照护者沟通的挑战与策略——叙述方法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Dec;34(4):852-860. doi: 10.1111/scs.12789. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
10
The experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making of a relative living with advanced dementia: A qualitative study.有高级认知障碍的亲属的家庭照顾者在最佳利益决策方面的经验和准备情况:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jul;74(7):1595-1604. doi: 10.1111/jan.13576. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-care of informal caregivers inventory.非正式照顾者自我护理量表的编制与心理测量学评估
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Sep 12;7:100237. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100237. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Dementia care-giving from a family network perspective in Germany: A typology.德国从家庭网络视角出发的痴呆症照护:一种类型学。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):579-591. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13161. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
[Compatibility of caring in dementia, family and employment].[痴呆症护理、家庭与就业的兼容性]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Nov;54(7):643-650. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01764-9. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
What do family caregivers of people with dementia need? A mixed-method systematic review.痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者需要什么?一项混合方法系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):1942-1960. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13048. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Buffer or Blade: Perceived relationship closeness in couples navigating Alzheimer's.缓冲还是利刃:阿尔茨海默病患者夫妻关系中的亲密感。
J Aging Stud. 2020 Mar;52:100832. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100832. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
A comparison of primary and secondary caregivers of persons with dementia.痴呆患者主要和次要照顾者的比较。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):20-27. doi: 10.1037/pag0000380.
6
Determinants of Burden and Satisfaction in Informal Caregivers: Two Sides of the Same Coin? The CUIDAR-SE Study.非专业照护者负担和满意度的决定因素:同一枚硬币的两面?CUIDAR-SE 研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 9;16(22):4378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224378.
7
Informal caregivers' experiences of caring for persons with dementia in Estonia: A narrative study.爱沙尼亚非专业照护者照顾痴呆症患者的体验:一项叙事研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):448-455. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12877. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
The Paths to Negative and Positive Experiences of Informal Caregiving in Severe Mental Illness: A Study of Explanatory Models.严重精神疾病中非正式护理负向和正向体验的路径:解释模型研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 20;16(19):3530. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193530.
9
Caring for a frail older person: the association between informal caregiver burden and being unsatisfied with support from family and friends.照顾体弱老年人:非正规照护者负担与对家庭和朋友支持不满意之间的关系。
Age Ageing. 2019 Sep 1;48(5):658-664. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz054.
10
Influence of Positive and Negative Dimensions of Dementia Caregiving on Caregiver Well-Being and Satisfaction With Life: Findings From the IDEAL Study.痴呆症照护的积极和消极维度对照护者幸福感和生活满意度的影响:来自 IDEAL 研究的结果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;27(8):838-848. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 11.