Hyun Seung-Jae, Lenke Lawrence G, Kim Yongjung, Bridwell Keith H, Cerpa Meghan, Blanke Kathy M
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Service, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Neurospine. 2021 Sep;18(3):457-463. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142182.091. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
To compare and identify risk factors for distal adding-on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by anterior- (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3.
AIS patients undergoing ASF versus PSF to L3 from 2000-2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results. New stable (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores.
Twenty of 42 (ASF group: 47.6%) and 8 of 72 patients (PSF group: 11.1%) showed poor radiographic outcome. Fused vertebrae, correction rate of main curve, coronal reduction rate of L3 were significantly higher in PSF group. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (odds ratio [OR], 2.7 and 3.7, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.9), rigid disc at L3-4 (OR, 3.7), lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) rotation > 15° (OR, 3.3), LIV deviation > 2 cm from center sacral vertical line (OR, 3.1) and ASF (OR, 13.4; p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors. There was significant improvement of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 average scores only in PSF group. Furthermore, the ultimate scores of PSF group were significantly superior to ASF group.
The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was significantly higher in ASF group. Ultimate SRS-22 scores were significantly better in PSF group.
比较并确定在接受前路脊柱融合术(ASF)和后路脊柱融合术(PSF)至L3治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)中,远端附加(AO)或远端交界性后凸(DJK)的危险因素。
分析2000年至2010年接受ASF与PSF至L3的AIS患者。远端AO和DJK被视为影像学结果不佳。本研究定义了新的稳定(SV)和中立椎(NV)评分。总稳定性(TS)评分是SV和NV评分之和。
42例患者中有20例(ASF组:47.6%),72例患者中有8例(PSF组:11.1%)显示影像学结果不佳。PSF组的融合椎体数、主弯矫正率、L3的冠状面矫正率显著更高。多因素逻辑回归结果表明,站立位和侧弯位时L3的术前SV-3(优势比[OR]分别为2.7和3.7)、L3的TS评分为-5、-6(OR,4.9)、L3-4节段的僵硬椎间盘(OR,3.7)、最低融合椎(LIV)旋转>15°(OR,3.3)、LIV偏离骶骨中心垂直线>2 cm(OR,3.1)以及ASF(OR,13.4;p<0.001)是独立的预测因素。仅PSF组的脊柱侧凸研究学会(SRS)-22平均评分有显著改善。此外,PSF组的最终评分显著优于ASF组。
在L3有LIV的AIS患者末次随访时,ASF组AO或DJK的发生率显著更高。PSF组的SRS-22最终评分显著更好。