• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌前徙和逆时针旋转中双皮质、微型钢板及混合固定技术的比较:一项有限元分析研究。

Comparison of bicortical, miniplate and hybrid fixation techniques in mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation: A finite element analysis study.

作者信息

Can Serhat, Basa Selcuk, Varol Altan

机构信息

Specialist, Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.

Professor & Dean, Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;122(4):e7-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2021.04.004
PMID:33848666
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate biomechanical stability and stress distribution of five different fixation types with finite element analysis using 10-mm advancement with or without counterclockwise rotation of the mandible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After sagittal split osteotomy, 10-mm advancement was performed in the first group and 10-mm advancement and 10-degree counterclockwise rotation were performed in the second group. One miniplate (M-1), two-miniplate (M-2), one miniplate and a bicortical screw (H), l-shaped bicortical screw (B-1), and inverted l-shaped bicortical screw (B-2) systems were placed. Totally, 120 N force was applied to the models at a 45-degree angle from the lower edge of the symphysis.

RESULTS

The highest values on fixation were seen with miniplate, while the mean values were obtained with bicortical screw system. The highest values on bone were achieved using bicortical screws. One miniplate (M-1) showed both the highest and mean displacement. The highest values in counterclockwise-rotated models increased in all parameters, compared to non-rotated models.

CONCLUSION

In cases in which passive alignment between segments and adequate bone contact are ensured, inverted l-shaped bicortical screw, two-miniplate, or hybrid systems are recommended.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过有限元分析评估五种不同固定类型在下颌骨进行10毫米前移(有或无逆时针旋转)时的生物力学稳定性和应力分布。

材料与方法

矢状劈开截骨术后,第一组进行10毫米前移,第二组进行10毫米前移和10度逆时针旋转。分别植入一种微型钢板(M-1)、两种微型钢板(M-2)、一种微型钢板和一枚双皮质螺钉(H)、L形双皮质螺钉(B-1)以及倒L形双皮质螺钉(B-2)系统。在模型的耻骨联合下缘处以45度角施加120牛的力。

结果

微型钢板的固定值最高,而双皮质螺钉系统获得平均值。双皮质螺钉在骨上的值最高。一种微型钢板(M-1)的位移最高值和平均值均最大。与未旋转模型相比,逆时针旋转模型的所有参数值均增加。

结论

在确保节段间被动对齐和充分骨接触的情况下,推荐使用倒L形双皮质螺钉、两种微型钢板或混合系统。

相似文献

1
Comparison of bicortical, miniplate and hybrid fixation techniques in mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation: A finite element analysis study.下颌前徙和逆时针旋转中双皮质、微型钢板及混合固定技术的比较:一项有限元分析研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;122(4):e7-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
2
Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.下颌前伸固定方法及其对颞下颌关节的影响的有限元分析研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 21;2020:2810763. doi: 10.1155/2020/2810763. eCollection 2020.
3
Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?固定方式是否会影响下颌前伸术后的颞下颌关节?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;46(6):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
4
In vitro comparison of fixation methods used in sagittal split osteotomy with a major advancement and counterclockwise rotation.矢状劈开截骨术并前徙和逆时针旋转中固定方法的体外比较
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun;60(5):617-622. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.采用三维有限元分析法对当前和新型设计的下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术微型接骨板固定技术的比较评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
6
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.传统与锁定微型钢板/螺钉系统用于下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的体外生物力学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;68(4):724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.018. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
7
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.下颌后缩矢状劈开下颌支截骨术固定方法的体外生物力学评估
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;43(2):186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.逆时针下颌前徙后矢状劈开截骨术六种稳定固定技术的力学评估
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;54(5):573-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:前徙手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.009.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.下颌骨前徙矢状劈开截骨术混合固定方法的生物力学评价
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;46(12):2063-2068. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 9.