Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Sainte-Justine University Hospital Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Apr;84:105346. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105346. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Patient-specific models promises to support the surgical decision-making process, particularly in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The present computational biomechanical study investigates how specific instrumentation parameters impact 3D deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis.
1080 instrumentation simulations of a representative patient were run. The independent instrumentation parameters were: screw pattern, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, rod curvature and rod stiffness. ANOVA and correlation analyses analyzed how the instrumentation parameters influenced the 3D correction.
Coronal plane correction was affected by the lower instrumented vertebra and rod stiffness (explaining 84% and 11%, respectively, of its overall variance). The sagittal profile was controlled by rod curvature and the upper vertebra (56% and 36%). The transverse plane vertebral rotation was influenced by lower, upper instrumented vertebra and screw pattern (35%, 32% and 19%). The Cobb angle correction was strongly correlated with the number of fused vertebrae, particularly when grouped by the upper instrumented vertebra (r = -0.91) and rod stiffness (r = -0.73). Thoracic kyphosis was strongly correlated with the number of fused vertebrae grouped by rod curvature (r = 0.84). Apical vertebral rotation was moderately correlated with the number of fused vertebrae grouped by upper/lower instrumented vertebra (r = 0.55/0.58), although variations were minimal.
Instrumenting the last vertebra touching the central sacral vertical line improves 3D correction. A trade-off between a more cranial vs. caudal upper instrumented vertebra, respectively beneficial for coronal/sagittal vs. transverse plane correction, is required. High rod stiffness, differential rod contouring, and screw pattern were effective for coronal correction, thoracic kyphosis, and axial vertebral derotation, respectively.
患者特异性模型有望支持手术决策过程,尤其是在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸中。本计算生物力学研究调查了特定的器械参数如何影响胸弯的三维畸形矫正。
对一名代表性患者进行了 1080 次器械模拟。独立的器械参数为:螺钉模式、上下器械椎、棒曲率和棒刚度。方差分析和相关分析用于分析器械参数如何影响三维矫正。
冠状面矫正受下器械椎和棒刚度的影响(分别解释了其总方差的 84%和 11%)。矢状位曲线由棒曲率和上椎控制(分别占 56%和 36%)。横向平面椎体旋转受下、上器械椎和螺钉模式的影响(分别占 35%、32%和 19%)。Cobb 角矫正与融合椎的数量密切相关,尤其是当按上器械椎(r=-0.91)和棒刚度(r=-0.73)分组时。胸椎后凸与按棒曲率分组的融合椎数量密切相关(r=0.84)。顶椎旋转与按上/下器械椎分组的融合椎数量中度相关(r=0.55/0.58),尽管变化很小。
在最后一个接触中轴骶骨垂线的椎骨上进行器械固定可改善三维矫正。需要在上器械椎选择更靠近颅侧还是更靠近尾侧之间进行权衡,这分别有利于冠状面/矢状面和横断面的矫正。高棒刚度、棒的差异轮廓和螺钉模式分别对冠状面矫正、胸椎后凸和轴向椎体旋转有效。