• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鉴定野生种质资源中的抗性来源。

Identification of Sources of Resistance in a Collection of Wild Germplasm.

机构信息

Centre for Crop and Disease Management, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.

Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Floreat, WA 6104, Australia.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2021 Sep;105(9):2314-2324. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-21-0367-RE. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1094/PDIS-02-21-0367-RE
PMID:33851865
Abstract

is an important fungal pathogen of chickpea ( L.), and it can cause yield losses up to 100%. The wild progenitors are much more diverse than domesticated chickpea, and this study describes how this relates to resistance. Initially, the pathogenicity of nine Australian isolates was examined on three lines to develop a robust phenotyping assay, and significant differences in isolate aggressiveness were identified with six isolates being classed as highly aggressive and three as moderately aggressive. We identified two isolates, CU8.20 and CU10.12, to be highly aggressive and moderately aggressive, respectively. A subsequent phenotyping assay was conducted using the two isolates to evaluate 86 wild accessions ( and ) and two varieties for resistance to . A subset of 12 genotypes was further evaluated, and subsequently, two wild accessions with consistently high levels of resistance to were examined using the initially characterized nine isolates. Wild accessions Karab_084 and Deste_063 demonstrated consistent partial resistance to . There were significant differences in responses to across wild collection sites. The Cermik, Karabahce, and Destek sites' responses to the aggressive isolate CU8.20 ranged from resistant to susceptible, highlighting an interaction between isolate genotype and chickpea collection site for sclerotinia stem rot resistance. This is the first evidence of partial stem resistance identified in wild germplasm, which can be adopted in chickpea breeding programs to enhance resistance in future chickpea varieties.

摘要

是鹰嘴豆(L.)的一种重要真菌病原体,可导致高达 100%的产量损失。野生祖先比驯化的鹰嘴豆更加多样化,本研究描述了这种多样性与抗性的关系。最初,在三个系上检查了 9 个澳大利亚分离物的致病性,以开发一种稳健的表型分析方法,发现分离物的侵袭性存在显著差异,其中 6 个分离物被归类为高度侵袭性,3 个为中度侵袭性。我们确定了两个分离物 CU8.20 和 CU10.12,分别为高度侵袭性和中度侵袭性。随后使用这两个分离物进行了后续的表型分析,以评估 86 个野生 (和 )和两个 品种对 的抗性。进一步评估了 12 个基因型的子集,随后使用最初表征的 9 个分离物检查了对 具有一致高水平抗性的两个野生 。野生 品系 Karab_084 和 Deste_063 对 表现出一致的部分抗性。野生 收集点对 的反应存在显著差异。Cermik、Karabahce 和 Destek 地点对侵袭性分离物 CU8.20 的反应范围从抗到感,突出了分离物基因型和鹰嘴豆收集地点之间对茎溃疡病抗性的相互作用。这是首次在野生 种质中鉴定出部分茎部抗性的证据,可用于鹰嘴豆育种计划,以提高未来鹰嘴豆品种的 抗性。

相似文献

1
Identification of Sources of Resistance in a Collection of Wild Germplasm.鉴定野生种质资源中的抗性来源。
Plant Dis. 2021 Sep;105(9):2314-2324. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-21-0367-RE. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
2
Novel Sources of Resistance to Root-Lesion Nematode () in a New Collection of Wild Species ( and ) to Improve Resistance in Cultivated Chickpea ().野生豌豆属()和兵豆属()新收集种中根结线虫()抗性的新来源,以提高栽培鹰嘴豆()的抗性。
Phytopathology. 2019 Jul;109(7):1270-1279. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-02-19-0047-R. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
3
Analysis of differentially expressed Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes during the interaction with moderately resistant and highly susceptible chickpea lines.分析与中度抗性和高度敏感性鹰嘴豆品系互作过程中扩展盘菌差异表达基因。
BMC Genomics. 2021 May 8;22(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07655-6.
4
Identification of Novel Sources of Resistance to Ascochyta Blight in a Collection of Wild Accessions.鉴定野生近缘种资源中对壳二孢叶斑病的新抗性来源。
Phytopathology. 2021 Feb;111(2):369-379. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-20-0137-R. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
5
Identification of Sclerotinia stem rot resistance quantitative trait loci in a chickpea () recombinant inbred line population.鉴定鹰嘴豆()重组自交系群体中茎溃疡病抗性的数量性状位点。
Funct Plant Biol. 2022 Jun;49(7):634-646. doi: 10.1071/FP21216.
6
Mapping resistance to Phytophthora root rot identifies independent loci from cultivated (Cicer arietinum L.) and wild (Cicer echinospermum P.H. Davis) chickpea.定位抗根腐病的能力,从栽培(鹰嘴豆 Cicer arietinum L.)和野生(硬毛鹰嘴豆 Cicer echinospermum P.H. Davis)鹰嘴豆中鉴定出独立的基因座。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Apr;132(4):1017-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3256-6. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
7
First Report of Sclerotinia Stem Rot of Chickpea Caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in North Dakota and Washington.北达科他州和华盛顿州由核盘菌引起的鹰嘴豆菌核茎腐病的首次报道
Plant Dis. 2006 Jan;90(1):114. doi: 10.1094/PD-90-0114A.
8
Development of ESTs from chickpea roots and their use in diversity analysis of the Cicer genus.鹰嘴豆根ESTs的开发及其在鹰嘴豆属多样性分析中的应用。
BMC Plant Biol. 2005 Aug 17;5:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-5-16.
9
Comprehensive Sclerotinia Stem Rot Screening of Soybean Germplasm Requires Multiple Isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.大豆种质资源的全面菌核病茎腐病筛选需要多个核盘菌分离株。
Plant Dis. 2017 Feb;101(2):344-353. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-16-1055-RE. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
Development and Evaluation of Germplasm Lines with Quantitative Resistance to .对……具有数量抗性的种质系的开发与评价
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 31;8:1495. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01495. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
White Mold: A Global Threat to Crops and Key Strategies for Its Sustainable Management.白霉病:对作物的全球威胁及其可持续管理的关键策略
Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 24;13(1):4. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010004.
2
Tackling Control of a Cosmopolitan Phytopathogen: .应对一种世界性植物病原体的控制:
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Aug 20;12:707509. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.707509. eCollection 2021.
3
Analysis of differentially expressed Sclerotinia sclerotiorum genes during the interaction with moderately resistant and highly susceptible chickpea lines.
分析与中度抗性和高度敏感性鹰嘴豆品系互作过程中扩展盘菌差异表达基因。
BMC Genomics. 2021 May 8;22(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07655-6.