Department of Neuroradiology, INF 400, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Dec;31(4):1141-1148. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01013-5. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
A major drawback of liquid embolic agents (LEAs) is the generation of imaging artifacts (IA), which may represent a crucial obstacle for the detection of periprocedural hemorrhage or subsequent radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). This study aimed to compare the IAs of Onyx, Squid and PHIL in a novel three-dimensional in vitro AVM model in conventional computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT).
Tubes with different diameters were configured in a container resembling an AVM with an artificial nidus at its center. Subsequently, the AVM models were filled with Onyx 18, Squid 18, PHIL 25% or saline and inserted into an imaging phantom (n = 10/LEA). Afterwards CT and CBCT scans were acquired. The degree of IAs was graded quantitatively (Hounsfield units in a defined region of interest) and qualitatively (feasibility of defining the nidus)-Onyx vs. Squid vs. PHIL vs. saline, respectively.
Quantitative density evaluation demonstrated more artifacts for Onyx compared to Squid and PHIL, e.g. 48.15 ± 14.32 HU for Onyx vs. 7.56 ± 1.34 HU for PHIL in CT (p < 0.001) and 41.88 ± 7.22 density units (DU) for Squid vs. 35.22 ± 5.84 DU for PHIL in CBCT (p = 0.044). Qualitative analysis showed less artifacts for PHIL compared to Onyx and Squid in both imaging modalities while there was no difference between Onyx and Squid regarding the definition of the nidus (p > 0.999).
In this novel three-dimensional in vitro AVM model, IAs were higher for the EVOH/tantalum-based LEAs Onyx and Squid compared to iodine-based PHIL. Onyx induced the highest degree of IAs with only minor differences to Squid.
液态栓塞剂(LEA)的一个主要缺点是产生成像伪影(IA),这可能是检测围手术期出血或随后对脑动静脉畸形(AVM)进行放射外科手术的一个关键障碍。本研究旨在比较新型三维体外 AVM 模型中在常规计算机断层扫描(CT)和锥形束 CT(CBCT)中使用 Onyx、Squid 和 PHIL 产生的 IA。
将不同直径的管配置在一个容器中,该容器类似于中心有一个人工病灶的 AVM。随后,将 AVM 模型充满 Onyx 18、Squid 18、PHIL 25%或生理盐水,并插入成像体模(LEA 各 10 个/管)。然后进行 CT 和 CBCT 扫描。IA 程度通过定量(在定义的感兴趣区域中的亨氏单位)和定性(是否能定义病灶)来评估-Onyx 与 Squid 与 PHIL 与生理盐水相比。
定量密度评估表明,与 Squid 和 PHIL 相比,Onyx 的伪影更多,例如 CT 中 Onyx 为 48.15±14.32HU,而 PHIL 为 7.56±1.34HU(p<0.001),CBCT 中 Squid 为 41.88±7.22 密度单位(DU),而 PHIL 为 35.22±5.84 DU(p=0.044)。定性分析表明,在两种成像方式中,与 Onyx 和 Squid 相比,PHIL 的伪影更少,而在病灶定义方面,Onyx 和 Squid 之间没有差异(p>0.999)。
在这个新型三维体外 AVM 模型中,EVOH/钽基 LEA Onyx 和 Squid 比碘基 PHIL 产生的 IA 更高。与 Squid 相比,Onyx 诱导的 IA 程度最高,但差异很小。