Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(2):477-487. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06221-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
To compare efficacy and safety of capecitabine and lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (cituxumumab) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab.
Following an initial safety run-in cohort, patients were randomized 1:2 to Arm A (capecitabine and lapatinib) or to Arm B (capecitabine, lapatinib, and cituxumumab). Given the frequency of non-hematologic grade ≥ 3 adverse events in those receiving the three-drug combination in the safety cohort, lapatinib and capecitabine doses were reduced in Arm B only. The primary objective was to determine if the addition of cituxumumab to capecitabine and lapatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine and lapatinib. Secondary objectives included a comparison between arms of other clinical endpoints, safety, change in overall quality of life (QOL) and self-assessed fatigue, rash, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome.
From July 2008 to March 2012, 68 patients (out of 142 planned) were enrolled and 63 were evaluable, including 8 for the safety run-in and 55 for the randomized cohort. Study enrollment was stopped early due to slow accrual. The addition of cituxumumab to capecitabine and lapatinib did not improve PFS (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.52-1.64). Furthermore, no difference in objective response rate or overall survival (OS) was observed. No difference between arms was observed in grade ≥ 3 adverse events, overall QOL change from baseline after 4 cycles of treatment.
The addition of cituxumumab to lapatinib and capecitabine did not improve PFS or OS compared with lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive MBC.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00684983.
比较卡培他滨和拉帕替尼联合或不联合 IMC-A12(西妥昔单抗)治疗曲妥珠单抗治疗后 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的疗效和安全性。
在初始安全性入组队列后,患者按 1:2 随机分配至 A 组(卡培他滨和拉帕替尼)或 B 组(卡培他滨、拉帕替尼和西妥昔单抗)。鉴于安全性队列中接受三药联合治疗的患者非血液学 3 级及以上不良事件的频率较高,仅在 B 组中降低了拉帕替尼和卡培他滨的剂量。主要目的是确定与卡培他滨和拉帕替尼相比,西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和拉帕替尼是否能改善无进展生存期(PFS)。次要目标包括比较两组之间的其他临床终点、安全性、总生活质量(QOL)变化以及自我评估的疲劳、皮疹、腹泻和手足综合征。
从 2008 年 7 月至 2012 年 3 月,共纳入 68 例(计划纳入 142 例)患者,其中 63 例可评估,包括 8 例安全性入组患者和 55 例随机分组患者。由于入组速度较慢,研究提前停止。与卡培他滨和拉帕替尼相比,西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和拉帕替尼并未改善 PFS(HR 0.93,95%CI:0.52-1.64)。此外,客观缓解率或总生存期(OS)也无差异。两组间 3 级及以上不良事件、治疗 4 周期后总 QOL 自基线变化无差异。
与卡培他滨和拉帕替尼相比,西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和拉帕替尼并未改善 HER2 阳性 MBC 患者的 PFS 或 OS。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00684983。