Suppr超能文献

卡培他滨和拉帕替尼联合或不联合 IMC-A12(西妥昔单抗)治疗曲妥珠单抗和化疗治疗后 HER2 阳性晚期乳腺癌患者的随机 II 期试验:NCCTG N0733(Alliance)。

Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine and Lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (Cituxumumab) in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy: NCCTG N0733 (Alliance).

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(2):477-487. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06221-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare efficacy and safety of capecitabine and lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (cituxumumab) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Following an initial safety run-in cohort, patients were randomized 1:2 to Arm A (capecitabine and lapatinib) or to Arm B (capecitabine, lapatinib, and cituxumumab). Given the frequency of non-hematologic grade ≥ 3 adverse events in those receiving the three-drug combination in the safety cohort, lapatinib and capecitabine doses were reduced in Arm B only. The primary objective was to determine if the addition of cituxumumab to capecitabine and lapatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine and lapatinib. Secondary objectives included a comparison between arms of other clinical endpoints, safety, change in overall quality of life (QOL) and self-assessed fatigue, rash, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome.

RESULTS

From July 2008 to March 2012, 68 patients (out of 142 planned) were enrolled and 63 were evaluable, including 8 for the safety run-in and 55 for the randomized cohort. Study enrollment was stopped early due to slow accrual. The addition of cituxumumab to capecitabine and lapatinib did not improve PFS (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.52-1.64). Furthermore, no difference in objective response rate or overall survival (OS) was observed. No difference between arms was observed in grade ≥ 3 adverse events, overall QOL change from baseline after 4 cycles of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The addition of cituxumumab to lapatinib and capecitabine did not improve PFS or OS compared with lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive MBC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00684983.

摘要

目的

比较卡培他滨和拉帕替尼联合或不联合 IMC-A12(西妥昔单抗)治疗曲妥珠单抗治疗后 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

在初始安全性入组队列后,患者按 1:2 随机分配至 A 组(卡培他滨和拉帕替尼)或 B 组(卡培他滨、拉帕替尼和西妥昔单抗)。鉴于安全性队列中接受三药联合治疗的患者非血液学 3 级及以上不良事件的频率较高,仅在 B 组中降低了拉帕替尼和卡培他滨的剂量。主要目的是确定与卡培他滨和拉帕替尼相比,西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和拉帕替尼是否能改善无进展生存期(PFS)。次要目标包括比较两组之间的其他临床终点、安全性、总生活质量(QOL)变化以及自我评估的疲劳、皮疹、腹泻和手足综合征。

结果

从 2008 年 7 月至 2012 年 3 月,共纳入 68 例(计划纳入 142 例)患者,其中 63 例可评估,包括 8 例安全性入组患者和 55 例随机分组患者。由于入组速度较慢,研究提前停止。与卡培他滨和拉帕替尼相比,西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和拉帕替尼并未改善 PFS(HR 0.93,95%CI:0.52-1.64)。此外,客观缓解率或总生存期(OS)也无差异。两组间 3 级及以上不良事件、治疗 4 周期后总 QOL 自基线变化无差异。

结论

与卡培他滨和拉帕替尼相比,西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和拉帕替尼并未改善 HER2 阳性 MBC 患者的 PFS 或 OS。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00684983。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Anti-insulin-like growth factor therapy in breast cancer.抗胰岛素样生长因子治疗乳腺癌。
J Mol Endocrinol. 2018 Jul;61(1):T61-T68. doi: 10.1530/JME-17-0261. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
7
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验