• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主要学术医院提供的眼科患者教育材料的可读性。

The Readability of Ophthalmological Patient Education Materials Provided by Major Academic Hospitals.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.

Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

出版信息

Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):71-76. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1915341. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1080/08820538.2021.1915341
PMID:33852375
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The internet is an increasingly important resource for patients seeking health-related information. Because of this trend, the American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommend that online patient education materials (PEMs) be written between a third and seventh grade level. The present study evaluates the readability levels of ophthalmological PEMs provided by five major academic hospitals, quantifies the availability of accompanying videos and graphics, and examines the extent to which readability may be increased.

METHODS

In March 2021, 397 PEMs from five major academic hospitals were extracted for subsequent analysis by seven validated readability assessments. The presence of an accompanying video or graphic was noted. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons test and the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Nearly all articles were written above the recommended reading level of 7 grade. After averaging the scales for each article, the median grade level was 11.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 10.7-12.7). The PEMs with the highest median reading level were provided by the Johns Hopkins University Wilmer Institute (12.6, IQR, 11.3 - 13.6). Only 13.6% and 13.1% of articles had an accompanying video and graphic, respectively. Reduction of sentence length beneath 15 words resulted in an improvement of readability by 2.7 grade levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The readability of online patient resources provided by major academic hospitals were above the literacy guidelines recommended by the NIH and AMA. Furthermore, most articles did not include a video or graphic, both of which could potentially improve patient understandability of educational materials. By altering these PEMs, as demonstrated here, institutions could increase the value these articles provide for patients and therefore the quality of the patient-physician relationship.

摘要

引言

互联网是患者获取健康相关信息的日益重要的资源。由于这一趋势,美国医学协会(AMA)和美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)建议在线患者教育材料(PEM)的写作水平应介于三年级至七年级之间。本研究评估了五所主要学术医院提供的眼科 PEM 的可读性水平,量化了伴随视频和图形的可用性,并研究了提高可读性的程度。

方法

2021 年 3 月,从五所主要学术医院提取了 397 篇 PEM 进行后续分析,使用七种经过验证的可读性评估方法。注意伴随视频或图形的存在。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Dunn 的多重比较检验以及卡方检验评估统计学意义。

结果

几乎所有文章的写作水平都高于推荐的 7 级阅读水平。在对每篇文章的量表进行平均后,中位数阅读水平为 11.7(四分位距 [IQR],10.7-12.7)。阅读水平中位数最高的 PEM 由约翰霍普金斯大学威尔默研究所提供(12.6,IQR,11.3-13.6)。只有 13.6%和 13.1%的文章分别有伴随的视频和图形。将句子长度缩短至 15 个单词以下,可使可读性提高 2.7 个等级。

结论

主要学术医院提供的在线患者资源的可读性高于 NIH 和 AMA 推荐的读写能力指南。此外,大多数文章都没有视频或图形,这两者都可以提高患者对教育材料的理解能力。通过改变这些 PEM,如这里所示,医疗机构可以提高这些文章为患者提供的价值,从而提高医患关系的质量。

相似文献

1
The Readability of Ophthalmological Patient Education Materials Provided by Major Academic Hospitals.主要学术医院提供的眼科患者教育材料的可读性。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):71-76. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1915341. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.主要政府、非营利组织和制药机构的在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):616-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Radiology Online Patient Education Materials Provided by Major University Hospitals: Do They Conform to NIH and AMA Guidelines?大型大学医院提供的放射学在线患者教育材料:它们是否符合美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会的指南?
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Mar-Apr;47(2):75-79. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations.评估主要老年病学协会在线患者教育材料的可读性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):1051-1056. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16960. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
A READABILITY COMPARISON OF ONLINE SPANISH AND ENGLISH PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS ABOUT VISION HEALTH.在线西班牙语和英语视力健康患者教育材料的可读性比较。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;29(2):182-188. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1910316. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
7
Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.基于互联网的内镜鼻窦手术相关患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1649-54. doi: 10.1002/lary.23309. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
8
Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States.美国学术医学中心的 COVID-19 患者教育材料的可读性、内容和质量。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):690-693. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.023. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
9
Analysis of online patient education materials in pediatric ophthalmology.儿科眼科在线患者教育材料分析
J AAPOS. 2015 Oct;19(5):430-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.07.286.
10
Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials.在线声带麻痹资料的可读性和易懂性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):460-4. doi: 10.1177/0194599815626146. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.尿石症患者在线资料的跨语言分析:对24种欧洲语言的评估
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(2):221-227. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2025.0045. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Patient Educational Materials for Pheochromocytoma Exceed Recommended Readability Level: An Analysis Across Three Independent Reading Instruments.嗜铬细胞瘤患者教育材料超出推荐的可读性水平:基于三种独立阅读工具的分析
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02666-3.
3
Improving health literacy and stakeholder-directed knowledge of One Health through analysis of readability: a cross sectional infodemiology study.
通过可读性分析提高健康素养和利益相关者对“同一健康”的定向知识:一项横断面信息传播流行病学研究
Sci One Health. 2024 Nov 7;3:100088. doi: 10.1016/j.soh.2024.100088. eCollection 2024.
4
Readability of Patient-Facing Information of Antibiotics Used in the WHO Short 6-Month and 9-Month All Oral Treatment for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.世界卫生组织推荐的用于耐多药结核病 6 个月和 9 个月全口服治疗方案中使用的抗生素患者须知的易读性。
Lung. 2024 Oct;202(5):741-751. doi: 10.1007/s00408-024-00732-z. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
5
Assessment of the Quality, Accountability, and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Optic Neuritis.视神经炎在线患者教育材料的质量、问责制及可读性评估
Neuroophthalmology. 2024 Mar 12;48(4):257-266. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2024.2301728. eCollection 2024.
6
Readability of Patient Electronic Materials for Atopic Dermatitis in 23 Languages: Analysis and Implications for Dermatologists.23种语言的特应性皮炎患者电子资料的可读性:对皮肤科医生的分析与启示
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Mar;14(3):671-684. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01115-1. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
7
Artificial Intelligence as a Triage Tool during the Perioperative Period: Pilot Study of Accuracy and Accessibility for Clinical Application.人工智能作为围手术期的分诊工具:临床应用准确性和可及性的初步研究
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Feb 2;12(2):e5580. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005580. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Improving health literacy of antibiotic use in people with cystic fibrosis (CF)-comparison of the readability of patient information leaflets (PILs) from the EU, USA and UK of 23 CF-related antibiotics used in the treatment of CF respiratory infections.提高囊性纤维化(CF)患者抗生素使用的健康素养——比较欧盟、美国和英国用于治疗CF呼吸道感染的23种CF相关抗生素的患者信息传单(PIL)的可读性。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Dec 1;5(6):dlad129. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad129. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Improving health literacy of antifungal use-Comparison of the readability of antifungal medicines information from Australia, EU, UK, and US of 16 antifungal agents across 5 classes (allylamines, azoles, echinocandins, polyenes, and others).提高抗真菌药物使用的健康素养——比较来自澳大利亚、欧盟、英国和美国的 16 种抗真菌药物(烯丙胺类、唑类、棘白菌素类、多烯类和其他类)在 5 个类别中的信息的可读性。
Med Mycol. 2023 Sep 4;61(9). doi: 10.1093/mmy/myad084.
10
Content, Readability, and Accountability of Online Health Information for Patients Regarding Blue Light and Impact on Ocular Health.关于蓝光及对眼部健康影响的在线患者健康信息的内容、可读性和可问责性。
Cureus. 2023 May 8;15(5):e38715. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38715. eCollection 2023 May.