Suppr超能文献

大型大学医院提供的放射学在线患者教育材料:它们是否符合美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会的指南?

Radiology Online Patient Education Materials Provided by Major University Hospitals: Do They Conform to NIH and AMA Guidelines?

作者信息

Prabhu Arpan V, Donovan Ashley L, Crihalmeanu Tudor, Hansberry David R, Agarwal Nitin, Beriwal Sushil, Kale Hrishikesh, Heller Matthew

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Mar-Apr;47(2):75-79. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 22.

Abstract

AIMS

The internet creates opportunities for Americans to access medical information about imaging tests and modalities to guide them in their medical decision-making. Owing to health literacy variations in the general population, the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend patient education resources to be written between the third and seventh grade levels. Our purpose is to quantitatively assess the readability levels of online radiology educational materials, written for the public, in 20 major university hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In September and October 2016, we identified 20 major university hospitals with radiology residency-affiliated hospital systems. On each hospital׳s website, we downloaded all radiology-related articles written for patient use. A total of 375 articles were analyzed for readability level using 9 quantitative readability scales that are well validated in the medical literature.

RESULTS

The 375 articles from 20 hospital systems were collectively written at an 11.4 ± 3.0 grade level (range: 8.4-17.1). Only 11 (2.9%) articles were written at the recommended third to seventh grade levels. Overall, 126 (33.6%) were written above a full high-school reading level. University of Washington Medical Center׳s articles were the most readable with a reading level corresponding to 7.9 ± 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of websites at major academic hospitals with radiology residencies designed to provide patients with information about imaging were written above the nationally recommended health literacy guidelines to meet the needs of the average American. This may limit the benefit that patients can derive from these educational materials.

摘要

目的

互联网为美国人提供了获取有关影像检查和方式的医学信息的机会,以指导他们进行医疗决策。由于普通人群的健康素养存在差异,美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院建议患者教育资源的编写水平应在三年级至七年级之间。我们的目的是定量评估20家主要大学医院为公众编写的在线放射学教育材料的可读性水平。

材料与方法

2016年9月和10月,我们确定了20家拥有放射科住院医师培训附属医院系统的主要大学医院。在每家医院的网站上,我们下载了所有为患者使用而编写的放射学相关文章。使用在医学文献中得到充分验证的9种定量可读性量表,对总共375篇文章的可读性水平进行了分析。

结果

来自20个医院系统的375篇文章的总体编写水平为11.4±3.0年级(范围:8.4 - 17.1)。只有11篇(2.9%)文章的编写水平在建议的三年级至七年级之间。总体而言,126篇(33.6%)文章的编写水平高于高中完整阅读水平。华盛顿大学医学中心的文章可读性最强,阅读水平相当于7.9±0.9。

结论

大多数设有放射科住院医师培训项目的主要学术医院网站,旨在为患者提供有关影像的信息,其编写水平高于国家推荐的健康素养指南,以满足普通美国人的需求。这可能会限制患者从这些教育材料中获得的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验