Tokat Taskin, Müderris Togay, Bozkurt Ergul Basaran, Ergun Uğurtan, Aysel Abdulhalim, Catli Tolgahan
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Jul;25(3):138-145. doi: 10.7874/jao.2020.00458. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
This study aimed to evaluate the audiologic results after cochlear implantation (CI) in older patients and the degree of improvement in their quality of life (QoL). Subjects and.
Patients over 65 years old who underwent CI at implant center in Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital were included in this study (n=54; 34 males and 20 females). The control group was patient over 65 years old with normal hearing (n=54; 34 males and 20 females). We administered three questionnaires [World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), World Health Organization Quality of Life-OLD (WHOQOL-OLD)], and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) to evaluate the QoL, CIrelated effects on activities of daily life, and social activities in all the subjects. Moreover, correlations between speech recognition and the QoL scores were evaluated. The duration of implant use and comorbidities were also examined as potential factors affecting QoL.
The patients had remarkable improvements (the mean score of postoperative speech perception 75.7%) in speech perception after CI. The scores for the WHOQOL-OLD and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire responses were similar in both the study and control groups, except those for a two subdomains (social relations and social participation). The patients with longer-term CI had higher scores than those with short-term CI use. In general, the changes in GDS scores were not significant (p<0.05).
The treatment of hearing loss with CI conferred significant improvement in patient's QoL (p<0.01). The evaluation of QoL can provide multidimensional insights into a geriatric patient's progress and, therefore, should be considered by audiologists.
本研究旨在评估老年患者人工耳蜗植入(CI)后的听力学结果及其生活质量(QoL)的改善程度。研究对象与……
本研究纳入了在博兹亚卡培训与研究医院植入中心接受CI的65岁以上患者(n = 54;男性34例,女性20例)。对照组为听力正常的65岁以上患者(n = 54;男性34例,女性20例)。我们使用了三份问卷[世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)、世界卫生组织老年生活质量量表(WHOQOL - OLD)]和老年抑郁量表(GDS)来评估所有受试者的生活质量、CI对日常生活活动及社交活动的影响。此外,还评估了言语识别与生活质量得分之间的相关性。植入物使用时长和合并症也作为影响生活质量的潜在因素进行了检查。
患者在CI后言语感知方面有显著改善(术后言语感知平均得分75.7%)。除两个子领域(社会关系和社会参与)外,研究组和对照组在WHOQOL - OLD和WHOQOL - BREF问卷回答得分方面相似。CI使用时间较长的患者得分高于短期使用CI的患者。总体而言,GDS得分变化不显著(p<0.05)。
CI治疗听力损失使患者的生活质量有显著改善(p<0.01)。生活质量评估可为老年患者的病情进展提供多维度见解,因此,听力学家应予以考虑。