Nkhata Bay District Health Office, Nkhata Bay District Hospital, Nkhata Bay, Malawi.
Global Health and Development Department, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Apr;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100291.
To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies to investigate the impact of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) apps on adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).
PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus and ProQuest were searched, in addition to references of identified articles and similar reviews. Experimental studies, reported in English, assessing DSMES app intervention's impact on adherence and clinical outcomes of patients with T2D compared with usual care were included. Study bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2.0 tool. Analysis plan involved narrative synthesis, moderator and meta-analysis.
Six randomised controlled trials were included, involving 696 participants (average age 57.6 years, SD 10.59). Mobile apps were mostly used for imputing clinical data, dietary intake or physical activity, and transmitting information to the provider. At 3 months, DSMES apps proved effective in improving medication adherence (standardized mean difference (SMD)=0.393, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.61), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (mean difference (MD)=-0.314, 95% CI -0.477 to -0.151) and Body Mass Index (BMI) (MD=-0.28, 95% CI -0.545 to -0.015). All pooled estimates had low heterogeneity ( 0%). Four studies had moderate risk of bias while one each was judged to be low and high risks, respectively.
DSMES apps had significant small to moderate effects on medication adherence, HbA1c and BMI of patients with T2D compared with usual care. Apps were described as reliable, easy to use and convenient, though participants were required to be phone literate. Evidence comes from feasibility trials with generally moderate risk of bias. Larger trials with longer follow-up periods using theory-based interventions are required to improve current evidence.
系统评价和荟萃分析干预性研究,以调查糖尿病自我管理教育和支持(DSMES)应用程序对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者依从性的影响。
检索了 PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、Web of Science、Scopus 和 ProQuest,此外还检索了已确定文章的参考文献和类似综述。纳入了以英语报告的实验研究,这些研究评估了 DSMES 应用程序干预对 T2D 患者依从性和临床结局的影响,与常规护理相比。使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚 V.2.0 工具评估研究偏倚。分析计划包括叙述性综合、调节和荟萃分析。
纳入了 6 项随机对照试验,涉及 696 名参与者(平均年龄 57.6 岁,SD 10.59)。移动应用程序主要用于输入临床数据、饮食摄入或体力活动,并将信息传输给提供者。在 3 个月时,DSMES 应用程序在改善药物依从性方面(标准化均数差(SMD)=0.393,95%CI 0.17 至 0.61)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(平均差(MD)=-0.314,95%CI -0.477 至 -0.151)和体重指数(BMI)(MD=-0.28,95%CI -0.545 至 -0.015)方面均显示出有效。所有汇总估计值的异质性均较低( 0%)。4 项研究的偏倚风险为中度,而 1 项研究的偏倚风险分别为低和高。
与常规护理相比,DSMES 应用程序对 T2D 患者的药物依从性、HbA1c 和 BMI 具有显著的小到中度影响。应用程序被描述为可靠、易于使用且方便,尽管参与者需要具备手机使用能力。证据来自于偏倚风险通常为中度的可行性试验。需要进行更大规模、随访时间更长、基于理论的干预措施的试验,以提高现有证据。