• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学术研究联盟对早期、晚期和极晚期出血事件的高出血风险定义。

Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Definitions for Early, Late, and Very Late Bleeding Events.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital.

出版信息

Circ J. 2021 May 25;85(6):797-805. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0120. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0120
PMID:33853992
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The validity of the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) definitions of early (<1 year), late (1-4 years), and very late (>4 years) bleeding events is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study was performed on patients (n=3,453) implanted with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) between 2010 and 2013. Data on all criteria of the ARC-HBR definition were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 3 or 5 bleeding events; the ischemic endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. The mean follow-up period was 7.5 years. Compared with non-high bleeding risk (HBR) patients, HBR patients (n=1,840; 53.3%) had an increased risk of the primary endpoint (early events, 3.6% vs. 0.5% [P<0.0001]; late events, 5.3% vs. 2.5% [P<0.0001]; very late events, 5.5% vs. 2.1% [P<0.0001]) and of ischemic events during follow-up. The discrimination ability of the ARC-HBR definition for late and very late bleeding events was comparable to that of early bleeding events (C statistics 0.679, 0.621, and 0.620, respectively) with high negative predictive value (96.6%, 95.1%, and 93.1%, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed the different effects of individual criteria on bleeding events in each follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARC-HBR definition consistently identified patients at risk of long-term bleeding and ischemic events after second-generation DES implantation.

摘要

背景

学术研究联合会高出血风险(ARC-HBR)定义的早期(<1 年)、晚期(1-4 年)和极晚期(>4 年)出血事件的有效性尚不清楚。

方法和结果

本研究纳入了 2010 年至 2013 年期间植入第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)的 3453 例患者。回顾性收集了 ARC-HBR 定义的所有标准的数据。主要终点是出血学术研究联合会 3 型或 5 型出血事件;缺血终点是心脏死亡、心肌梗死和缺血性卒中的复合终点。平均随访时间为 7.5 年。与非高出血风险(HBR)患者相比,HBR 患者(n=1840;53.3%)发生主要终点(早期事件 3.6% vs. 0.5%[P<0.0001];晚期事件 5.3% vs. 2.5%[P<0.0001];极晚期事件 5.5% vs. 2.1%[P<0.0001])和随访期间缺血事件的风险增加。ARC-HBR 定义对晚期和极晚期出血事件的区分能力与早期出血事件相当(C 统计值分别为 0.679、0.621 和 0.620),且阴性预测值较高(分别为 96.6%、95.1%和 93.1%)。多变量分析显示,个体标准对每个随访期出血事件的影响不同。

结论

ARC-HBR 定义一致识别出第二代 DES 植入后长期出血和缺血事件风险患者。

相似文献

1
Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Definitions for Early, Late, and Very Late Bleeding Events.学术研究联盟对早期、晚期和极晚期出血事件的高出血风险定义。
Circ J. 2021 May 25;85(6):797-805. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0120. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Application of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk criteria in patients treated with coronary bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: Insights from the POEM trial.应用学术研究联合会高出血风险标准于接受冠状动脉生物可吸收聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者:来自 POEM 试验的结果。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Oct;67:77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.022. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Prevalence of the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Criteria and Prognostic Value of a Simplified Definition.高出血风险学术研究联盟标准的流行程度和简化定义的预后价值。
Circ J. 2020 Aug 25;84(9):1560-1567. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0395. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Comparison and Validation of Long-Term Bleeding Events for Academic Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) Criteria and Contemporary Risk Scores for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Second-Generation Drug Eluting Stent.比较和验证第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的学术出血风险(ARC-HBR)标准和当代风险评分的长期出血事件。
Circ J. 2022 Aug 25;86(9):1379-1387. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0901. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
5
Comparison of original and modified Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk definitions in real-world practice.真实世界实践中原始和改良的学术研究联盟高出血风险定义的比较。
J Cardiol. 2022 Aug;80(2):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.02.018. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
Contribution of ESC DAPT guideline-endorsed high thrombotic risk features to long-term clinical outcomes among patients with and without high bleeding risk after PCI.ESC DAPT 指南推荐的高血栓风险特征对 PCI 后高出血风险和低出血风险患者长期临床结局的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jul 1;20(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01600-3.
7
Application of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk Criteria in an All-Comers Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.学术研究联盟高出血风险标准在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗所有患者登记中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov;12(11):e008307. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008307. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Durable Polymer Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Patient-Level Stratified Analysis From Four Postapproval Studies.高出血风险患者中持久聚合物钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架的长期安全性和疗效:四项上市后研究的患者水平分层分析。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 17;141(11):891-901. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041619. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
Ischemic and Bleeding Events in PENDULUM Patients With High Bleeding Risk and High Platelet Reactivity.具有高出血风险和高血小板反应性的PENDULUM患者的缺血和出血事件
Circ J. 2022 Apr 25;86(5):763-771. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0717. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
10
Impact of ischemic risk factors on long-term outcomes in patients with and without high bleeding risk.缺血性危险因素对高出血风险和低出血风险患者的长期预后的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;326:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.073. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Discriminative Ability of Bleeding Risk Criteria and Scores for Predicting Short- and Mid-Term Major Bleeding Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出血风险标准和评分对预测短期及中期主要出血事件的鉴别能力比较
Circ Rep. 2023 Dec 15;6(1):4-15. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0087. eCollection 2024 Jan 10.
2
Incidence and outcomes of high bleeding risk patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction in a community-based cohort: Application of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk Criteria.基于社区队列的 1 型和 2 型心肌梗死患者高出血风险的发生率和结局:应用学术研究联合会高出血风险标准。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Feb 1;396:131565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131565. Epub 2023 Oct 30.