• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真实世界实践中原始和改良的学术研究联盟高出血风险定义的比较。

Comparison of original and modified Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk definitions in real-world practice.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2022 Aug;80(2):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.02.018. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.02.018
PMID:35282943
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) defined high bleeding risk (HBR) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We have reported a simplified HBR (S-HBR), excluding six items with prevalences under 1% from ARC-HBR. The Japanese Circulation Society developed an HBR specific to Japanese (J-HBR), adding three items to ARC-HBR in consideration of ethnicity. Data comparing each HBR are scarce.

METHODS

Patients treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents between January 2010 and December 2013 were enrolled, in whom all items of ARC-HBR, and the incidences of major bleeding and ischemic events were examined. Also, the diagnostic values of ARC-HBR, S-HBR, and J-HBR at 1 and 7 years post procedure were compared by using receiver-operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 3430 patients. Mean follow-up period was 2299 ± 904 days. The incidence of major bleeding at 1 and 7 years in each definition was as follows: ARC-HBC, 3.3% and 10.6%; S-HBR, 3.3% and 10.7%; and J-HBR, 2.9% and 10.0%. The diagnostic value of J-HBR for major bleeding at 1 year was lower than that of ARC-HBR (C statistics 0.64 vs. 0.68, p < 0.001). Other diagnostic values of S-HBR and J-HBR were comparable to those of ARC-HBR.

CONCLUSIONS

S-HBR was as useful as ARC-HBR in predicting both short- and long-term HBR, and J-HBR is useful for predicting long-term HBR.

摘要

背景

学术研究冠状动脉高出血风险联盟(ARC-HBR)定义了接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的高出血风险(HBR)。我们已经报告了一种简化的 HBR(S-HBR),将 ARC-HBR 中六个患病率低于 1%的项目排除在外。日本循环学会开发了一种专门针对日本人的 HBR(J-HBR),考虑到种族因素,在 ARC-HBR 的基础上增加了三个项目。比较每种 HBR 的数据很少。

方法

纳入 2010 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间接受第二代药物洗脱支架治疗的患者,检查所有 ARC-HBR 项目、大出血和缺血性事件的发生率。还通过接受者操作特征曲线比较 ARC-HBR、S-HBR 和 J-HBR 在术后 1 年和 7 年的诊断价值。

结果

研究样本包括 3430 例患者。平均随访时间为 2299±904 天。每种定义的 1 年和 7 年的大出血发生率如下:ARC-HBR,3.3%和 10.6%;S-HBR,3.3%和 10.7%;J-HBR,2.9%和 10.0%。J-HBR 在术后 1 年预测大出血的诊断价值低于 ARC-HBR(C 统计量为 0.64 与 0.68,p<0.001)。S-HBR 和 J-HBR 的其他诊断价值与 ARC-HBR 相当。

结论

S-HBR 与 ARC-HBR 一样可用于预测短期和长期 HBR,J-HBR 可用于预测长期 HBR。

相似文献

1
Comparison of original and modified Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk definitions in real-world practice.真实世界实践中原始和改良的学术研究联盟高出血风险定义的比较。
J Cardiol. 2022 Aug;80(2):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.02.018. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
2
Association between the number of Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的学术研究联盟高出血风险(ARC-HBR)标准数量与临床结局的关系。
J Cardiol. 2023 Jun;81(6):553-563. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
3
Application of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk Criteria in an All-Comers Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.学术研究联盟高出血风险标准在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗所有患者登记中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov;12(11):e008307. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008307. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Comparison and Validation of Long-Term Bleeding Events for Academic Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) Criteria and Contemporary Risk Scores for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Second-Generation Drug Eluting Stent.比较和验证第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的学术出血风险(ARC-HBR)标准和当代风险评分的长期出血事件。
Circ J. 2022 Aug 25;86(9):1379-1387. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0901. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
5
Prevalence of the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Criteria and Prognostic Value of a Simplified Definition.高出血风险学术研究联盟标准的流行程度和简化定义的预后价值。
Circ J. 2020 Aug 25;84(9):1560-1567. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0395. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Validation of the academic research consortium high bleeding risk definition in Thai PCI registry.验证学术研究联盟高出血风险定义在泰国 PCI 注册研究中的应用。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 1;388:131167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131167. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
7
Simplified Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) Definition Predicts Bleeding Events in Patients With Heart Failure.简化学术研究联盟对高出血风险 (ARC-HBR) 的定义预测了心力衰竭患者的出血事件。
Circ J. 2021 Dec 24;86(1):147-155. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0686. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
8
Application of the Modified High Bleeding Risk Criteria for Japanese Patients in an All-Comers Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - From the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-3.改良的日本患者高出血风险标准在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗所有患者登记研究中的应用 - 来自 CREDO-Kyoto 登记研究队列-3。
Circ J. 2021 May 25;85(6):769-781. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0836. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk Definitions for Early, Late, and Very Late Bleeding Events.学术研究联盟对早期、晚期和极晚期出血事件的高出血风险定义。
Circ J. 2021 May 25;85(6):797-805. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0120. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
10
Validation of the Domestic High Bleeding Risk Criteria for Japanese Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.验证日本急性心肌梗死患者国内高出血风险标准。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Mar 1;30(3):299-309. doi: 10.5551/jat.63576. Epub 2022 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Discriminative Ability of Bleeding Risk Criteria and Scores for Predicting Short- and Mid-Term Major Bleeding Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出血风险标准和评分对预测短期及中期主要出血事件的鉴别能力比较
Circ Rep. 2023 Dec 15;6(1):4-15. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0087. eCollection 2024 Jan 10.
2
Diagnostic ability of Japanese version of high bleeding risk criteria for ischemic outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.日本版急性心肌梗死缺血性结局高出血风险标准的诊断能力。
Heart Vessels. 2024 Jan;39(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02303-3. Epub 2023 Aug 20.