Hinterbuchinger Barbara, Mossaheb Nilufar
Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 29;12:582392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.582392. eCollection 2021.
Assuming a continuum between psychotic experiences and psychotic symptoms aligned between healthy individuals and patients with non-psychotic and psychotic disorders, recent research has focused on subclinical psychotic experiences. The wide variety of definitions, assessment tools, and concepts of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) might contribute to the mixed findings concerning prevalence and persistence rates and clinical impact. In this narrative review, we address the panoply of terminology, definitions, and assessment tools of PLEs and associated concerns with this multitude. Moreover, the ambiguous results of previous studies regarding the clinical relevance of PLEs are described. In conclusion, we address clinical implications and highly suggest conceptual clarity and consensus concerning the terminology and definition of PLEs. The development of an agreed upon use of a "gold standard" assessment tool seems essential for more comparable findings in future research.
假设在健康个体与非精神病性及精神病性障碍患者之间,精神病性体验与精神病性症状存在连续统一体,近期研究聚焦于亚临床精神病性体验。精神病样体验(PLEs)的定义、评估工具及概念种类繁多,这可能导致有关患病率、持续率及临床影响的研究结果参差不齐。在本叙述性综述中,我们探讨了PLEs的一系列术语、定义和评估工具以及与此众多内容相关的问题。此外,还描述了先前研究关于PLEs临床相关性的模糊结果。总之,我们阐述了临床意义,并强烈建议在PLEs的术语和定义方面达成概念清晰和共识。开发一种商定使用的“金标准”评估工具,对于未来研究获得更具可比性的结果似乎至关重要。