Mesquita Geison P, Rodríguez-Teijeiro José D, Wich Serge A, Mulero-Pázmány Margarita
Department of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Bioscience, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain.
Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain.
Curr Zool. 2021 Apr;67(2):157-163. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoaa038. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
There is a growing body of research indicating that drones can disturb animals. However, it is usually unclear whether the disturbance is due to visual or auditory cues. Here, we examined the effect of drone flights on the behavior of great dusky swifts and white-collared swifts in 2 breeding sites where drone noise was obscured by environmental noise from waterfalls and any disturbance must be largely visual. We performed 12 experimental flights with a multirotor drone at different vertical, horizontal, and diagonal distances from the colonies. From all flights, 17% caused <1% of birds to temporarily abandon the breeding site, 50% caused half to abandon, and 33% caused more than half to abandon. We found that the diagonal distance explained 98.9% of the variability of the disturbance percentage and while at distances >50 m the disturbance percentage does not exceed 20%, at <40 m the disturbance percentage increase to > 60%. We recommend that flights with a multirotor drone during the breeding period should be conducted at a distance of >50 m and that recreational flights should be discouraged or conducted at larger distances (e.g. 100 m) in nesting birds areas such as waterfalls, canyons, and caves.
越来越多的研究表明无人机可能会干扰动物。然而,通常不清楚这种干扰是由于视觉线索还是听觉线索。在此,我们在两个繁殖地研究了无人机飞行对大黑雨燕和白领雨燕行为的影响,在这两个地方,瀑布的环境噪音掩盖了无人机的噪音,任何干扰很大程度上必定是视觉上的。我们使用多旋翼无人机在距鸟群不同的垂直、水平和对角距离处进行了12次实验飞行。在所有飞行中,17%的飞行导致不到1%的鸟类暂时离开繁殖地,50%的飞行导致一半鸟类离开,33%的飞行导致超过一半的鸟类离开。我们发现对角距离解释了干扰百分比变化的98.9%,当距离大于50米时,干扰百分比不超过20%,而当距离小于40米时,干扰百分比增至60%以上。我们建议在繁殖期使用多旋翼无人机飞行时应在大于50米的距离进行,并且在瀑布、峡谷和洞穴等筑巢鸟类区域,应不鼓励娱乐性飞行,或者在更大的距离(如100米)进行。