• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地面哺乳动物对无人机系统方法的反应。

Terrestrial mammalian wildlife responses to Unmanned Aerial Systems approaches.

机构信息

Okavango Research Institute, University of Botswana, Maun, Botswana.

Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):2142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38610-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-38610-x
PMID:30765800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6375938/
Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) are increasingly being used recreationally, commercially and for wildlife research, but very few studies have quantified terrestrial mammalian reactions to UAS approaches. We used two Vertical Take-off and Landing (VTOL) UAS to approach seven herbivore species in the Moremi Game Reserve, Botswana, after securing the relevant permissions. We recorded responses to 103 vertical and 120 horizontal approaches, the latter from three altitudes above ground level (AGL). We ran mixed logistic regressions to identify factors triggering (i) any response and (ii) an evasive response. We included effects of activity, altitude, direction of approach, distance, habitat, herd type, herd size, other species, target species, time, VTOL type and wind strength. Response triggers were linked to altitude, distance, habitat and target species. Elephant (Loxodonta africana), giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) and zebra (Equus quagga) were most affected by VTOL approach, impala (Aepyceros melampus) and lechwe (Kobus leche) were least responsive, and tsessebe (Damaliscus lunatus) displayed intermediate sensitivity. VTOLs flown lower than 60 m AGL and closer than 100 m horizontal distance from target animals triggered behavioural responses in most species. Enforced regulations on recreational UAS use in wildlife areas are necessary to minimise disturbance to terrestrial mammals.

摘要

无人航空系统 (UAS) 正越来越多地被用于娱乐、商业和野生动物研究,但很少有研究量化了陆地哺乳动物对 UAS 接近的反应。我们在博茨瓦纳的莫雷米禁猎区使用两架垂直起降 (VTOL) UAS 接近了七种食草动物,在此之前我们已经获得了相关许可。我们记录了 103 次垂直接近和 120 次水平接近的反应,后者来自地面以上三个不同的高度。我们运行了混合逻辑回归来确定触发 (i) 任何反应和 (ii) 逃避反应的因素。我们将活动、海拔、接近方向、距离、栖息地、畜群类型、畜群大小、其他物种、目标物种、时间、VTOL 类型和风力强度等因素纳入考虑范围。反应触发因素与海拔、距离、栖息地和目标物种有关。大象 (Loxodonta africana)、长颈鹿 (Giraffa camelopardalis)、角马 (Connochaetes taurinus) 和斑马 (Equus quagga) 受到 VTOL 接近的影响最大,黑斑羚 (Aepyceros melampus) 和水羚 (Kobus leche) 的反应最小,而捻角羚 (Damaliscus lunatus) 的敏感性则处于中间水平。在距离目标动物低于 60 米 AGL 和 100 米水平距离以内飞行的 VTOL 会触发大多数物种的行为反应。有必要对野生动物地区的休闲 UAS 使用进行强制性监管,以最大限度地减少对陆地哺乳动物的干扰。

相似文献

1
Terrestrial mammalian wildlife responses to Unmanned Aerial Systems approaches.地面哺乳动物对无人机系统方法的反应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):2142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38610-x.
2
Bluetongue antibody in Botswana's domestic and game animals.博茨瓦纳家畜和野生动物中的蓝舌病抗体。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1979 Feb;11(1):43-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02237767.
3
Trypanosoma brucei Infection in asymptomatic greater Kudus (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) on a game ranch in Zambia.赞比亚一个野生动物保护区内无症状大林羚(Tragelaphus strepsiceros)感染布氏锥虫的情况。
Korean J Parasitol. 2010 Mar;48(1):67-9. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2010.48.1.67. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
4
Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review.无人机系统作为野生动物干扰的新来源:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0178448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178448. eCollection 2017.
5
Behaviour reactions of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).宽吻海豚(Tursiops truncatus)对多旋翼无人机(UAVs)的行为反应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 12;9(1):8558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44976-9.
6
Evaluating behavioral responses of nesting lesser snow geese to unmanned aircraft surveys.评估筑巢的小雪雁对无人机调查的行为反应。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec 25;8(2):1328-1338. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3731. eCollection 2018 Jan.
7
Unmanned aerial survey of elephants.大象无人航空调查。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054700. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
8
Rainfall influences on ungulate population abundance in the Mara-Serengeti ecosystem.降雨对马拉-塞伦盖蒂生态系统中有蹄类动物种群数量的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2008 Jul;77(4):814-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01392.x. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
9
Evidence on the efficacy of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) as a survey tool for North American terrestrial, vertebrate animals: a systematic map.关于小型无人航空器系统(UAS)作为北美陆地脊椎动物调查工具的功效的证据:一项系统综述。
Environ Evid. 2023 Feb 13;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00294-8.
10
An experimental approach to evaluate the potential of drones in terrestrial mammal research: a gregarious ungulate as a study model.一种评估无人机在陆地哺乳动物研究中潜力的实验方法:以群居有蹄类动物作为研究模型。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Jan 15;7(1):191482. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191482. eCollection 2020 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Closing the air gap: the use of drones for studying wildlife ecophysiology.缩小差距:利用无人机研究野生动物生态生理学。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Jun;100(3):1206-1228. doi: 10.1111/brv.13181. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
2
Drone Observation for the Quantitative Study of Complex Multilevel Societies.用于复杂多层次社会定量研究的无人机观测
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;13(12):1911. doi: 10.3390/ani13121911.
3
Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities.迈向生态群落的全自动监测。

本文引用的文献

1
2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education.美国哺乳动物学会2016年关于在研究和教育中使用野生哺乳动物的指南。
J Mammal. 2016 Jun 9;97(3):663-688. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw078. Epub 2016 May 28.
2
Biomechanics of predator-prey arms race in lion, zebra, cheetah and impala.狮子、斑马、猎豹和黑斑羚的捕食者-猎物军备竞赛的生物力学
Nature. 2018 Feb 8;554(7691):183-188. doi: 10.1038/nature25479. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
3
Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census.海鸟对无人机普查的行为反应存在差异。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Dec;25(12):2753-2775. doi: 10.1111/ele.14123. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
4
Using piecewise regression to identify biological phenomena in biotelemetry datasets.利用分段回归在生物遥测数据集识别生物现象。
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Sep;91(9):1755-1769. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13779. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
5
Robust Algorithms for Drone-Assisted Monitoring of Big Animals in Harsh Conditions of Siberian Winter Forests: Recovery of European elk () in Salair Mountains.用于在西伯利亚冬季森林恶劣条件下无人机辅助监测大型动物的稳健算法:萨莱尔山脉欧洲驼鹿()的恢复情况
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 8;12(12):1483. doi: 10.3390/ani12121483.
6
Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation.机器学习在野生动物保护中的应用展望。
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 9;13(1):792. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-27980-y.
7
Responses of turkey vultures to unmanned aircraft systems vary by platform.火鸡秃鹫对无人机系统的反应因平台而异。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 4;11(1):21655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01098-5.
8
Sociability strongly affects the behavioural responses of wild guanacos to drones.群居性强烈影响野生原驼对无人机的行为反应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 22;11(1):20901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00234-5.
9
The behavioral responses of a nocturnal burrowing marsupial () to drone flight.一种夜行性穴居有袋动物对无人机飞行的行为反应。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 1;11(17):12173-12181. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7981. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Improving Animal Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) and Deep Learning Networks.利用小型无人机系统 (sUAS) 和深度学习网络加强动物监测。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 24;21(17):5697. doi: 10.3390/s21175697.
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 20;7(1):17884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18202-3.
4
An accurate and adaptable photogrammetric approach for estimating the mass and body condition of pinnipeds using an unmanned aerial system.一种使用无人机系统估算鳍足类动物体重和身体状况的精确且适应性强的摄影测量方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 29;12(11):e0187465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187465. eCollection 2017.
5
Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review.无人机系统作为野生动物干扰的新来源:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0178448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178448. eCollection 2017.
6
Beehive fences as a multidimensional conflict-mitigation tool for farmers coexisting with elephants.蜂箱围栏作为一种让农民与大象共存的多维度冲突缓解工具。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Aug;31(4):743-752. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12898. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Determining position, velocity and acceleration of free-ranging animals with a low-cost unmanned aerial system.利用低成本无人机系统测定自由放养动物的位置、速度和加速度。
J Exp Biol. 2016 Sep 1;219(Pt 17):2687-92. doi: 10.1242/jeb.139022. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition.用于水鸟调查的无人机形状、飞行路径和相机类型评估:干扰效应与物种识别
PeerJ. 2016 Mar 21;4:e1831. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1831. eCollection 2016.
9
Analyzing the proximity to cover in a landscape of fear: a new approach applied to fine-scale habitat use by rabbits facing feral cat predation on Kerguelen archipelago.在恐惧环境中分析与掩护物的距离:一种应用于克尔格伦群岛面临野猫捕食的兔子对精细尺度栖息地利用的新方法。
PeerJ. 2016 Mar 7;4:e1769. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1769. eCollection 2016.
10
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation.无人机与人工智能正在彻底改变野生动物监测与保护工作。
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Jan 14;16(1):97. doi: 10.3390/s16010097.