• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perspectives of Italian pregnant women on pregnancy examinations and pregnancy care: is the caregiver more important than the care?意大利孕妇对妊娠检查和妊娠护理的看法:是照顾者更重要还是护理更重要?
Acta Biomed. 2021 Mar 31;92(S2):e2021014. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11361.
2
Pregnancy related risk perception in pregnant women, midwives & doctors: a cross-sectional survey.孕妇、助产士和医生的妊娠相关风险感知:一项横断面调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Sep 27;19(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2467-4.
3
Detailed registration of care in midwifery practices in the Netherlands: an opportunity for research within a healthy pregnant population.荷兰助产实践中护理的详细登记:健康孕妇人群内研究的机会。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03053-0.
4
Midwife-led maternity care in Ireland - a retrospective cohort study.爱尔兰由助产士主导的孕产妇护理——一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1285-9.
5
Midwives in England and in Italy: two realities compared.英国和意大利的助产士:两种现实情况的比较。
Ann Ig. 2018 Jan-Feb;30(1):14-20. doi: 10.7416/ai.2018.2191.
6
Development and validation of the Midwife Profiling Questionnaire assessing women's preferred perinatal care professional and knowledge of midwives' legal competences.助产士概况调查问卷的开发与验证:评估女性对围产期护理专业人员的偏好以及对助产士法律能力的了解。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
7
Maternity Outcomes in Manitoba Women: A Comparison between Midwifery-led Care and Physician-led Care at Birth.曼尼托巴省女性的孕产结局:助产士主导护理与医生主导分娩护理的比较。
Birth. 2016 Jun;43(2):108-15. doi: 10.1111/birt.12225. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
8
Which role do midwives and gynecologists have in smoking cessation in pregnant women? - A study in Flanders, Belgium.助产士和妇科医生在孕妇戒烟中扮演什么角色?——比利时弗拉芒地区的一项研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2015 Jun;6(2):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
9
Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.不列颠哥伦比亚省农村和偏远地区的助产护理:一项对2003年至2008年有助产士参与护理的农村产妇围产期结局的回顾性队列研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):60-6. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12137.
10
Experiences and wishes of women regarding systemic aspects of midwifery care in Germany: a qualitative study with focus groups.德国女性对助产护理系统性方面的体验和期望:一项以焦点小组为重点的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1552-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Obstetric education and neonatal resuscitation at birth: an Italian survey.产科教育和新生儿复苏:意大利的一项调查。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Nov;35(21):4060-4064. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1846701. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Midwife-to-newborn ratio and neonatal outcome in healthy term infants.健康足月儿的助产士与新生儿比例及新生儿结局
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Sep;109(9):1787-1790. doi: 10.1111/apa.15180. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
The midwifery-led care model: a continuity of care model in the birth path.以助产士为主导的护理模式:分娩过程中的连续性护理模式。
Acta Biomed. 2019 Jul 8;90(6-S):41-52. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i6-S.8621.
4
[A survey carried out among Italian physicians regarding non-required clinical examinations, treatments and procedures in the current clinical practice: results and considerations.].[一项针对意大利医生关于当前临床实践中不必要的临床检查、治疗和操作的调查:结果与思考。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;108(7):324-332. doi: 10.1701/2731.27838.
5
Midwifery-led care for normal childbirth pathway in Lombardy Region.伦巴第地区由助产士主导的正常分娩路径护理。
Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Feb;69(1):115-117. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.16.03941-1.
6
Punches and knocks to the physicians: choosing wisely or self protection?对医生的拳打脚踢:明智选择还是自我保护?
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Nov;107(11):607-608. doi: 10.1701/2484.25982.
7
[Give birth in Italy is a "surgical" procedure.].在意大利分娩是一种“外科手术”程序。 (不过原英文句子表述有误,正确的应该是Giving birth in Italy is a "surgical" procedure. )
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Nov;107(11):559-561. doi: 10.1701/2484.25956.
8
Perinatal and maternal outcomes in a midwife-led centre in Italy: a comparison with standard hospital assistance.意大利一家由助产士主导的中心的围产期及产妇结局:与标准医院护理的比较。
Minerva Ginecol. 2016 Jun;68(3):237-42.
9
Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment.用于胎儿评估的产前胎心监护
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 12;2015(9):CD007863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007863.pub4.
10
Cesarean section on maternal request: should it be formally prohibited in Italy?应产妇要求进行剖宫产:在意大利是否应正式禁止?
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2015;51(2):162-6. doi: 10.4415/ANN_15_02_15.

意大利孕妇对妊娠检查和妊娠护理的看法:是照顾者更重要还是护理更重要?

Perspectives of Italian pregnant women on pregnancy examinations and pregnancy care: is the caregiver more important than the care?

机构信息

.

Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences. "Sapienza" University of Rome..

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2021 Mar 31;92(S2):e2021014. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11361.

DOI:10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11361
PMID:33855993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8138811/
Abstract

AIM

Assessing awareness of Italian low-risk pregnant patients on low-risk pregnancy care and what do they feel about their own pregnancy.

METHODS

A questionnaire was administered to 382 low-risk pregnant women. This questionnaire assessed general knowledge of low-risk pregnancy, low-risk pregnancy care, and how much patients rated ten topics of low-risk pregnancy care. It would be expected that the knowledge of each topic would associates with the patient's perceived importance of that topic.

RESULTS

Poor knowledge of pregnancy care was proven. Patients seem to incorrectly overrate vaginal examinations and obstetric and gynecologist-led care, while they attribute appropriate importance to midwife-led care. The more examinations performed (vaginal examinations, sonographic checks, cardiotocographies), the higher their rating.

CONCLUSIONS

In Italy, expectations of pregnant women about their own pregnancy are incorrectly trusted in the obstetrics and gynecologists. Both poor knowledge of pregnancy care and cultural perspectives on the birth process amongst Italian people explain the finding. Referring low-risk pregnant women to midwives would help them to rate more the care than the caregiver.

摘要

目的

评估意大利低危孕妇对低危妊娠护理的认知程度,以及她们对自己妊娠的感受。

方法

对 382 名低危孕妇进行问卷调查。该问卷评估了低危妊娠的一般知识、低危妊娠护理,以及患者对低危妊娠护理的十个主题的重视程度。预计每个主题的知识都与患者对该主题的重视程度相关。

结果

研究证明,孕妇对妊娠护理的知识匮乏。患者似乎错误地高估了阴道检查和产科医生主导的护理,而对助产士主导的护理给予了适当的重视。进行的检查越多(阴道检查、超声检查、胎心监护),她们的评分就越高。

结论

在意大利,孕妇对自己妊娠的期望被产科医生错误地信任。对妊娠护理的知识匮乏以及意大利人对分娩过程的文化观念解释了这一发现。将低危孕妇转介给助产士将有助于她们对护理的评价高于对护理人员的评价。