• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主题分析:在早发性痴呆症患者的夫妻中应对的方式。

Thematic Analysis of Dyadic Coping in Couples With Young-Onset Dementia.

机构信息

Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6111.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6111
PMID:33856476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8050740/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

A diagnosis of young-onset dementia (YOD) is a life-altering event for both persons with dementia and their spousal caregivers. Dyadic coping (DC) theoretical models acknowledge that dyads cope with stressors as a unit, but these models have yet to be used in YOD.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the lived experiences of couples managing YOD using an integrated DC model.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study recruited couples from a single major medical setting and through social media. Eligibility criteria included cohabitation, 1 partner diagnosed with YOD and able to participate, and both partners willing to participate. Live online video interviews were conducted from March to June 2020.

EXPOSURES

One semistructured interview, which was recorded and subsequently transcribed. Recruitment was stopped once thematic saturation was reached.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Five themes were deductively derived based on the integrated DC framework, including stress communication, positive individual DC, positive conjoint DC, negative individual DC, and negative conjoint DC. Within each theme, subthemes were inductively identified to further characterize couples' dyadic coping experiences with YOD.

RESULTS

A total of 23 couples were interviewed, comprising persons with dementia (11 women [48%]; mean [SD] age, 61.3 [4.65] years; mean [SD] time from diagnosis, 3.11 [3.85]) years; and spousal caregivers (13 women [57%]; mean [SD] age, 60.5 [5.40] years). Data supported the 5 a priori DC themes and novel subthemes describing couples' experiences with YOD. Specifically, couples enacted positive conjoint DC by approaching challenges using a teamwork approach to problem solving and relying on collaborative communication. In contrast, couples engaged in negative conjoint DC through mutual avoidance, leading to increased negative communication and conflict. Couples described initially engaging in avoidance and withdrawal to navigate YOD-related stressors. While these strategies provided short-term relief from challenging emotions, they prevented engagement in adaptive coping (eg, acceptance and collaborative problem-solving) to promote long-term adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study used an evidence-based integrated DC approach to identify the positive and negative coping behaviors of couples managing YOD. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use a DC framework to guide qualitative analysis, and it provides valuable insights into DC strategies used by couples navigating YOD-related stressors. Findings can inform the development of dyadic psychosocial services for couples managing YOD and have implications for other progressive illnesses.

摘要

重要性

对于痴呆症患者及其配偶照顾者来说,年轻发病型痴呆症 (YOD) 的诊断都是改变生活的事件。双元应对 (DC) 理论模型承认,双元作为一个单位应对压力源,但这些模型尚未在 YOD 中使用。

目的

使用综合 DC 模型探讨夫妻共同管理 YOD 的生活经历。

设计、设置和参与者:这项定性研究从一个主要的医疗场所和社交媒体招募了夫妻。入选标准包括同居、1 名伴侣被诊断为 YOD 并能够参与,以及双方都愿意参与。从 2020 年 3 月至 6 月,进行了在线视频现场访谈。

暴露

一次半结构化访谈,记录并随后转录。一旦达到主题饱和,就停止招募。

主要结果和措施

根据综合 DC 框架,得出了五个主题,包括压力沟通、积极的个体 DC、积极的联合 DC、消极的个体 DC 和消极的联合 DC。在每个主题中,都确定了归纳性的子主题,以进一步描述夫妻应对 YOD 的二元应对体验。

结果

共有 23 对夫妻接受了采访,包括痴呆症患者(11 名女性 [48%];平均 [标准差] 年龄,61.3 [4.65] 岁;平均 [标准差] 诊断后时间,3.11 [3.85] 年)和配偶照顾者(13 名女性 [57%];平均 [标准差] 年龄,60.5 [5.40] 岁)。数据支持了 5 个先验的 DC 主题和描述夫妻 YOD 经历的新主题。具体来说,夫妻通过采用团队合作的方法解决问题来应对挑战,从而实施积极的联合 DC,并依靠协作沟通。相比之下,夫妻通过相互回避来进行消极的联合 DC,从而导致沟通和冲突增加。夫妻描述了最初采用回避和退缩的方式来应对 YOD 相关的压力源。虽然这些策略为应对具有挑战性的情绪提供了短期缓解,但它们阻止了夫妻参与适应性应对(例如,接受和协作解决问题),以促进长期调整。

结论和相关性

这项研究使用基于证据的综合 DC 方法来确定夫妻管理 YOD 的积极和消极应对行为。据我们所知,这是首次使用 DC 框架指导定性分析的研究,它为夫妻应对 YOD 相关压力源时使用的 DC 策略提供了有价值的见解。研究结果可以为夫妻管理 YOD 提供双元心理社会服务,并对其他进行性疾病产生影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e60c/8050740/c3c75096eea4/jamanetwopen-e216111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e60c/8050740/c3c75096eea4/jamanetwopen-e216111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e60c/8050740/c3c75096eea4/jamanetwopen-e216111-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Thematic Analysis of Dyadic Coping in Couples With Young-Onset Dementia.主题分析:在早发性痴呆症患者的夫妻中应对的方式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6111.
2
Psychosocial Stressors and Adaptive Coping Strategies in Couples After a Diagnosis of Young-Onset Dementia.中青年期痴呆诊断后夫妻的心理社会压力源与适应应对策略。
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):262-275. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab053.
3
Couples' Experiences Managing Young-Onset Dementia Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic.夫妻在 COVID-19 大流行早期管理早发性痴呆症的经历。
Gerontologist. 2022 Sep 7;62(8):1173-1184. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab162.
4
One Diagnosis, Two Perspectives: Lived Experiences of Persons With Young-Onset Dementia and Their Care-Partners.一个诊断,两种视角:早发性痴呆患者及其照护者的生活体验。
Gerontologist. 2022 Oct 19;62(9):1311-1323. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac050.
5
A race against time: couples' lived diagnostic journeys to young-onset dementia.争分夺秒:夫妻共同经历的早发性痴呆诊断之旅。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Nov;26(11):2223-2232. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1966748. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
6
Thematic Analysis of Psychosocial Stressors and Adaptive Coping Strategies Among Informal Caregivers of Patients Surviving ICU Admission for Coma.对 ICU 昏迷后存活患者非专业照护者心理社会压力源和适应应对策略的主题分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Apr;40(2):674-688. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01804-3. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
7
In It Together: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Common and Unique Psychosocial Stressors and Adaptive Coping Strategies of Persons With Young-Onset Dementia and Their Caregivers.《共同应对:早发性痴呆患者及其照护者的常见和独特心理社会压力源及适应性应对策略的定性元分析》
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):e123-e139. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa169.
8
Transitions: Living With Young-Onset Alzheimer's Disease: A Qualitative Interview Study.转型:患有早发性阿尔茨海默病的生活:一项定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70034. doi: 10.1111/hex.70034.
9
Navigating the Journey of Living with Young-Onset Dementia: Experiences of Spousal Caregivers.《与早发性痴呆症共同生活的旅程:配偶照顾者的经历》
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(1):197-209. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240249.
10
Feeling useful and engaged in daily life: exploring the experiences of people with young-onset dementia.感到有用并参与日常生活:探索早发性痴呆患者的体验。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Nov;29(11):1889-1898. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001314. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
"Diagnosis in the Prime of Your Life": Facilitator Perspectives on Adapting the Living Well with Dementia (LivDem) Post-Diagnostic Course for Younger Adults.“黄金岁月中的诊断”:促进者对为年轻人调整痴呆症后诊断课程(LivDem)以实现良好生活的看法。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;15(6):794. doi: 10.3390/bs15060794.
2
Characterizing Stressors and Coping Strategies Among Caregivers of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury by Level of Distress.按痛苦程度对重症急性脑损伤患者照顾者的压力源和应对策略进行特征分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02294-1.
3
Resilient together for dementia: A qualitative study of couples' treatment preferences to address distress early after diagnosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychosocial Stressors and Adaptive Coping Strategies in Couples After a Diagnosis of Young-Onset Dementia.中青年期痴呆诊断后夫妻的心理社会压力源与适应应对策略。
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):262-275. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab053.
2
In It Together: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Common and Unique Psychosocial Stressors and Adaptive Coping Strategies of Persons With Young-Onset Dementia and Their Caregivers.《共同应对:早发性痴呆患者及其照护者的常见和独特心理社会压力源及适应性应对策略的定性元分析》
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):e123-e139. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa169.
3
Feasibility and Efficacy of a Resiliency Intervention for the Prevention of Chronic Emotional Distress Among Survivor-Caregiver Dyads Admitted to the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
共同应对痴呆症:一项关于夫妻在确诊后早期应对痛苦的治疗偏好的定性研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jun;105(3):808-824. doi: 10.1177/13872877251332658. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
4
A qualitative study on the disease coping experiences of pancreatic cancer patients and their spouses.一项关于胰腺癌患者及其配偶疾病应对体验的定性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 11;14(1):18626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69599-7.
5
'Misdiagnosed and Misunderstood': Insights into Rarer Forms of Dementia through a Stepwise Approach to Co-Constructed Research Poetry.“误诊与误解”:通过共同创作研究诗歌的逐步方法洞察罕见形式的痴呆症
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 17;12(4):485. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040485.
6
Palliative Care in Nursing Home Residents with Young-Onset Dementia: Professional and Family Caregiver Perspectives.养老院中早发性痴呆患者的姑息治疗:专业护理人员和家庭护理人员的观点。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;97(2):573-586. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230486.
7
Physician perspective on the implementation of risk mitigation strategies when prescribing opioid medications: a qualitative analysis.医生在开阿片类药物时实施减轻风险策略的观点:定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 31;23(1):1185. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10136-z.
8
Thematic Analysis of Psychosocial Stressors and Adaptive Coping Strategies Among Informal Caregivers of Patients Surviving ICU Admission for Coma.对 ICU 昏迷后存活患者非专业照护者心理社会压力源和适应应对策略的主题分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Apr;40(2):674-688. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01804-3. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
9
Discrepancies in dyadic coping: associations with distress and quality of life in couples facing early stage dementia.二元应对中的差异:与早期痴呆症夫妇的痛苦和生活质量的关联
Front Psychol. 2023 May 24;14:1056428. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056428. eCollection 2023.
10
Together from the start: A transdiagnostic framework for early dyadic interventions for neurodegenerative diseases.从一开始就携手合作:针对神经退行性疾病的早期对偶干预的跨诊断框架。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jun;70(6):1850-1862. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17801. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
弹性干预预防神经重症监护病房幸存者-照护者对慢性情绪困扰的可行性和疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2020807. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20807.
4
Recovering together: building resiliency in dyads of stroke patients and their caregivers at risk for chronic emotional distress; a feasibility study.共同康复:为有慢性情绪困扰风险的中风患者及其照料者二元组建立复原力;一项可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 May 25;6:75. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00615-z. eCollection 2020.
5
"" - the experience of losing sense of self in those with young onset dementia.“无我体验”——那些早发性痴呆症患者自我意识丧失的体验。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020 Dec;15(1):1734277. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1734277.
6
Caring for People With Young Onset Dementia: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Family Caregivers' Experiences.照顾早发性痴呆症患者:对家庭照顾者经历的解释现象学分析
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2019 Nov 1;57(11):37-44. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20190821-02. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
7
Online information and support for carers of people with young-onset dementia: A multi-site randomised controlled pilot study.在线信息和支持对照顾者的人有早发性痴呆:多站点随机对照试验研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;34(10):1455-1464. doi: 10.1002/gps.5154. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
8
Family caregivers' and professionals' stigmatic experiences with persons with early-onset dementia: a qualitative study.家庭照顾者和专业人员对早发性痴呆患者的污名化经历:一项定性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Mar;34(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/scs.12704. Epub 2019 May 6.
9
Dyadic Coping in Couples: A Conceptual Integration and a Review of the Empirical Literature.夫妻间的二元应对:概念整合与实证文献综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571. eCollection 2019.
10
Dyadic Coping Across the Lifespan: A Comparison Between Younger and Middle-Aged Couples With Breast Cancer.全生命周期中的二元应对:年轻与中年乳腺癌夫妇的比较
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 19;10:404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00404. eCollection 2019.