Department of General Internal Medicine, Tenri Yorozu Hospital, Mishima-cho 200, Tenri-shi, Nara, 632-8552, Japan.
Division of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Practice and Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Jul;41(7):1371-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04856-w. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
We read the article by Marsman et al. regarding the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) with great interest. This study added new insights regarding the use of MTX in a real-world clinical setting and its effect on the incidence rates of flares. However, we would like to voice our concerns regarding the definition of the participants and interventions that were performed in the study, as well as the comparability of the intervention and control groups. Our concerns include the possibility of the inadvertent enrollment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a study on PMR, a lack of a clear definition of glucocorticoid ineffectiveness, a lack of adjustment of glucocorticoid dosages, and a reliance on the judgement of individual medical providers rather than clearly defined investigative guidelines in the study procedures. To summarize, we would like to voice concerns about how and to whom MTX was prescribed, as well as the definition of the control group. These revisions and modifications would clarify the importance of the results regarding the efficacy of MTX administration in the treatment of PMR.
我们饶有兴致地阅读了 Marsman 等人撰写的关于甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗巨细胞动脉炎(PMR)疗效的文章。这项研究在真实临床环境中观察 MTX 的使用效果及其对复发率的影响,提供了新的见解。然而,我们想对研究中参与者和干预措施的定义以及干预组和对照组的可比性表示关注。我们的担忧包括在 PMR 研究中可能无意中纳入了类风湿关节炎患者、对糖皮质激素无效性缺乏明确定义、缺乏糖皮质激素剂量调整以及对个别医疗服务提供者的判断的依赖,而不是研究程序中明确规定的调查指南。总之,我们对 MTX 的开具方式和对象以及对照组的定义表示关注。这些修订和修改将澄清 MTX 治疗 PMR 疗效结果的重要性。