Dunstan G R
University of London.
J Med Genet. 1988 May;25(5):290-3. doi: 10.1136/jmg.25.5.290.
In answer to questions raised by practitioners, an ethics of genetic screening is located in a tension between liberty and responsibility in three respects: (1) to nature and biological processes; (2) to the disposal of human life; and (3) to the relation of persons to society. Under (1), the obligation to pursue research, fundamental as well as applied, is affirmed, offering the benefit of economy with fetal life, but requiring discrimination between the beneficial, the trivial, and the bizarre. Under (2) the abortion question, when relevant to diagnosed abnormality, is discussed, not in the language of conflicting rights, but of the relation of duties to interests. Under (3) the familial and social dimensions of screening raise questions of the disclosure of information and the keeping or extending of confidences. Last comes the value placed on truth in two related areas of developing practice. In infertility treatment, the donors of gametes are required to remain anonymous. Gene tracing through families requires for its effectiveness some correspondence between assumed identity and genetic identity. This conflict of social policies should be resolved.
针对从业者提出的问题,基因筛查伦理在三个方面存在自由与责任之间的紧张关系:(1)对自然和生物过程;(2)对人类生命的处置;(3)个人与社会的关系。在(1)之下,追求基础研究和应用研究的义务得到肯定,这为节省胎儿生命带来了好处,但需要区分有益的、琐碎的和奇异的。在(2)之下,讨论了堕胎问题,当与诊断出的异常相关时,不是用相互冲突的权利的语言,而是用义务与利益的关系的语言。在(3)之下,筛查的家庭和社会层面引发了信息披露以及保密或扩大保密范围的问题。最后是在两个相关的实践发展领域中对真相的重视。在不育治疗中,配子捐赠者必须保持匿名。通过家族进行基因追踪,其有效性要求假定身份与基因身份之间有一定的对应关系。这种社会政策的冲突应该得到解决。